Why bash V-8 conversions in the V-8 section?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-06, 07:44 PM
  #26  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by LT-x7
For any engine to be considered bulletproof I think it needs to be able to handle a fair amount of boost and/or nitrous on a otherwise stock motor. Also handle some overheating and other neglect and abuse.
Just because some n/a rotarys go 200,000+(I've never seen it happen, but I hear it's happened) doesn't make then a bulletproof engine.
My N/A has 190k and rolling, 200-250-300k on N/As is only uncommon because the chassis tend to rot out first, a problem with cars that are often driven only a handful of miles a year when new.

I've overheated my 12A quite a few times, certainly fewer times than the piston engines that I've turned to scrap metal.

Boost and nitrous make an engine no longer N/A, but for a counterpoint, the turbo engines have more internally in common with the N/A engines than not, certainly a lot more in common than turbo piston engines have with their naturally aspirated brethren.
Old 05-21-06, 08:11 PM
  #27  
Full Member

 
LT-x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: central Cali
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peejay
My N/A has 190k and rolling, 200-250-300k on N/As is only uncommon because the chassis tend to rot out first, a problem with cars that are often driven only a handful of miles a year when new.
I'm in california, no problem with rot out here only blown motors.
Originally Posted by peejay
I've overheated my 12A quite a few times, certainly fewer times than the piston engines that I've turned to scrap metal.
I've had a few friends that blew there 13b's the first time it overheated. No experience with overheating 12a's.
Originally Posted by peejay
Boost and nitrous make an engine no longer N/A, but for a counterpoint, the turbo engines have more internally in common with the N/A engines than not, certainly a lot more in common than turbo piston engines have with their naturally aspirated brethren.
Any engine considered bulletproof should be able to take anything you can throw at it.
N/A rotarys=reliable-------- not with my experiences but maybe.
N/A rotarys=bulletproof----no way.
Old 05-21-06, 08:54 PM
  #28  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by LT-x7
I've had a few friends that blew there 13b's the first time it overheated. No experience with overheating 12a's.
Probably '86-up engines where they break off a chunk of the side housing when they get overheated, leaving the coolant seal unsupported.

Any engine considered bulletproof should be able to take anything you can throw at it.
N/A rotarys=reliable-------- not with my experiences but maybe.
N/A rotarys=bulletproof----no way.
By that measure, no engine is bulletproof. You can break any engine just by grabbing the wrong gear at the wrong time, for example, or run it out of coolant or oil and drive at full power until the magic smoke comes out. (My favorite)
Old 05-21-06, 09:12 PM
  #29  
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
GtoRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pataskala, Ohio
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LT-x7
I'm in california, no problem with rot out here only blown motors.

I've had a few friends that blew there 13b's the first time it overheated. No experience with overheating 12a's.


Any engine considered bulletproof should be able to take anything you can throw at it.
N/A rotarys=reliable-------- not with my experiences but maybe.
N/A rotarys=bulletproof----no way.
I over heated my 20b to over 125C, for over 40 miles, running on water instead of oil, took it home let it cool down, fixed the freeze plug with the leak that caused it, fired it up and drove it all season going to 8,600rpms to the track, race for 4 hours, drive 6 hours back day in and out. A fucked up computer caused pre-ignition at 3,000rpms too, but it keep on running. In my book, that is pretty bullet-proof. Maybe you want me to drain the oil and water out and drive cross country with 38lbs of boost and clogged fuel filter? The V8's do that too? Give me a break.
Old 05-21-06, 09:16 PM
  #30  
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
GtoRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pataskala, Ohio
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kwman
N/A rotaries are bulletproof. Anyone that argues otherwise is an idiot. However, you're decent amount of power is just that...decent. So don't go blasting too much.
No, I dont brag about a low 12 second car, thats not very fast, its a road course car, thats what I built it for. Its just more fun to beat V8's with a crappy rotary, espically a crappy non-turbo rotary without any nOS.
Old 05-21-06, 09:19 PM
  #31  
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
GtoRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pataskala, Ohio
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Nihilanthic
330-350whp is pretty good, but if youre beating LS1s its because your car weighs less than most cars youre racing, period (considering they make the same power and have more torque...)

Dont confuse the chassis with the motor. That 20b would be pretty mediocre in a camaro or a mustang (unless it had signifigant ligthening modifications done) and basically require 4.10s or numerically higher rear gears and a T-56.

Also, just as an aside, if it didnt cost so goddamn much to make a 20B, swap it in, and get it running like you did, people wouldnt be swapping v8s so much!
Yeah the Mazda is built light we all know that! The 20B is not very expensive, esp. since the kit I sell takes all the hard work out of it, and retains factory handling. Any project car racks up mad money quick, thats the nature of building cars.
Old 05-21-06, 09:34 PM
  #32  
Full Member

 
LT-x7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: central Cali
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GtoRx7
I over heated my 20b to over 125C, for over 40 miles, running on water instead of oil, took it home let it cool down, fixed the freeze plug with the leak that caused it, fired it up and drove it all season going to 8,600rpms to the track, race for 4 hours, drive 6 hours back day in and out. A fucked up computer caused pre-ignition at 3,000rpms too, but it keep on running.
Ya that doesn't sound to bad, how many miles you got on that motor?
I've heard of luck like that with the na rotary. I just personaly don't know of anyone that's been that fortunate.

Whats the weight difference with the na 20b?
Old 05-21-06, 10:02 PM
  #33  
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
 
GtoRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pataskala, Ohio
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LT-x7
Ya that doesn't sound to bad, how many miles you got on that motor?
I've heard of luck like that with the na rotary. I just personaly don't know of anyone that's been that fortunate.

Whats the weight difference with the na 20b?
It has about 12,200 or somewhere close to that. The n/a 20b isnt too bad, engine-only was 255lbs. Dressed with the intake, exhaust, and fly it was 315lbs. The factory 20b stuff wasnt very good for weight, 52lbs stock intake alone was enough for me to ditch that ****. It is lighter now than it was with the factory twin turbo two-rotor. The whole car was 2620 last year, with a 130lb cage in it.

Last edited by GtoRx7; 05-21-06 at 10:06 PM.
Old 05-22-06, 12:28 AM
  #34  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BklynRX7
wow... a guy named "88IntegraLS" just called the rx7 a poser car... IM DONE!!!
My integra was not a poser, it was stock and pretty ugly. As a foolish youth I attempted a cold air intake mod along with a short shifter, and all they did was make a slow car louder and harder to drive. Here is what became of it because some idiot driver like yourself didn't have enough experience to look more than 3 seconds up the road:







40+mph impact and I was first to get the hit. I couldn't even open the door the frame was so smashed. You should have seen the look on the guy's face as I crawled out the window, like he saw a ghost, lol.

Just goes to show, morons are capable of some serious destruction. It's fitting that you don't like V8 RX7s, all that power would get you killed.
Old 05-22-06, 12:41 AM
  #35  
Senior Member

 
txturbogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: El Paso
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dare any rotard to ride on a decent powered LSX FD and say they suck and babble all the rotard BS they always say.

I owned a rotary and now own an LS1 FD and I just love it. The feel of instant acceleration without having to rev up to 6k rmps and dump the clutch is nice. Not having to worry about turbos, overheating, apex seals, etc, is a nice feeling.

Rotards are in denial, period. BTW, a rotard is whom preaches about the soul of the rx being the engine and stuff like that. I know there are some hardcore rotorheads here, the rotard comment is not inteded towards them.
Old 05-22-06, 04:10 AM
  #36  
Senior Member

 
rarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's just one problem with this whole thread: it's not just a "V8" forum, it's a forum for ALL engines that aren't rotary. So just because someone doesn't like V8's doesn't mean they "don't belong" here.

That said, I think it's pretty silly to like or hate an engine based solely on its basic design (ie 8 pistons vs. 2 rotors).

Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
Here is what became of it because some idiot driver like yourself didn't have enough experience to look more than 3 seconds up the road...
Ah, the DA Integra. That's a shame, they are pretty decent cars.
Old 05-22-06, 09:26 AM
  #37  
Ahh du ma! El Es Juan!

 
audiobot7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 2,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotary is unique! V8 sucks *****!
Old 05-22-06, 11:16 AM
  #38  
Full Member

 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BklynRX7

I do however think that you v8 guys should follow suite with what you say and stop make ****** little comments against rotaries in our sections. It would prevent backlash. I mean they had to abolish the whole rep points system because v8 guys would start arguements and then give bad reps to anyone who disagreed cough*jimlab*cough. but again im not hear to agrue, I just to agree to disagree.
You have ONE poster that does that, and you think al V8 guys start argumetns?

I built my V8 RX7 12 years ago, owned it for five years, have been posting on message boards for over a decade, and guess what? I've RARELY seen V8 guys "start arguments." In fact, I only know of two specific individuals who have done that, and even THEY only did it rarely, and those times were in response to a similar thread started to bash the V8s! I personally have NEVER done it.

Sorry, 99.9% of the insults and negative, nasty commentary is started and piled on by quasi-religious rotary zealots. That's a fact and any search of this or any other Mazda forum will corroborate that.

When you see V8 guys insulting rotary fans, it's usually in RESPONSE to a string of insults flung by said raotary fans all bent out of shape due to someone "desecrating" their religious idol.
Old 05-22-06, 02:55 PM
  #39  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
clubber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Jordan UT
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Juiceh]The Shelby Cobra is different because it was a piston engined car swapped with a larger piston engine. The Rotary fanatics love engine swaps as long as its the same type of engine.

I disagree that the shelby is different because it's just two different piston engines. I'm quite sure some devout british sports car fan, yes there are many, would talk about ruining the chassis balance and other such crap. I know when they came out with 240Z engine kits for Jensen Healey's that all the hardcores were bitching up a storm about putting a japanese engine in a sports car and how screwed up it would be. They are just like the wankle lovers, just a different car. All these types need to get over it.

P.S. I love my turbo rotary but I work on it ten times as much as the V-8, the gas mileage is worse and I worry every time it's due for an emissions check.
Old 05-22-06, 03:59 PM
  #40  
Zero Rotor Motorsports

iTrader: (1)
 
Crash Test Joey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kwman
N/A rotaries are bulletproof. Anyone that argues otherwise is an idiot. However, you're decent amount of power is just that...decent. So don't go blasting too much.
If this is the case, then how about sending me the money to buy a new motor, since mine destroyed itself with less than 80k miles on it. The rotor and housing certainly weren't bulletproof, as the apex seal that came apart certainly caused some extensive damage when it broke. I got about $87 for the leftover (undamaged) parts on eBay, so you can subtract that from the check you send me for the value of a "bulletproof N/A rotary"
Old 05-22-06, 04:28 PM
  #41  
\m/

 
Rhode_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't swap a corvette motor in a FD3S based purely on preference of sound. Strange as that may seem to some of you more "ellite" connoisseurs of engines, but I think an N/A 20B sounds worlds better than some lumpy v8
Old 05-22-06, 04:44 PM
  #42  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhode_Dog
Strange as that may seem to some of you more "ellite" connoisseurs of engines, but I think an N/A 20B sounds worlds better than some lumpy v8
A matter of taste is something even close friends will disagree violently on. Engine sound is one of those things.

For instance, I think 20Bs are best seen and not heard, and are only slightly less annoying than an inline four-cylinder (but not by much). And the only thing that beats the thump of a huge-cammed 600+cid V8 with sewerpipes is the rap of a well ported 2-rotor...
Old 05-22-06, 07:07 PM
  #43  
Used Register

 
V8Mongrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peejay
A matter of taste is something even close friends will disagree violently on. Engine sound is one of those things.
Well said. I personally find the wail of a turbo five-cylinder strangely intoxicating. I have not met many who agree with me.
Old 05-22-06, 07:54 PM
  #44  
Thunder from downunder

iTrader: (1)
 
aussiesmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Convoy, Ohio, USA
Posts: 3,843
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LT-x7
What do you consider bulletproof?
I agree they'll take a lot more abuse that a turbo rotary but I wouldn't call them anything near bulletproof.
For any engine to be considered bulletproof I think it needs to be able to handle a fair amount of boost and/or nitrous on a otherwise stock motor. Also handle some overheating and other neglect and abuse.
Just because some n/a rotarys go 200,000+(I've never seen it happen, but I hear it's happened) doesn't make then a bulletproof engine.
I own three running FBs with 134, 140 and 189K miles on them, all run great and all get 25 mpg. I drive about 1000 miles a week to deliver goods through NE Ohio, I have never been let down by the old 12as (Plural)

My old 13B BP in Australia was driven as a road and race car for 5 years, in autocrosses, HPDE, road racing, road rallies and even a few rallycrosses, it was run hard, and put away wet, won two state titles, entered probably 25 events per year, running stock seals.

When I sold it to move to USA it was still running great and strong.

Bulletproof, hell yeah.

I'm not anti V8 either.
Old 05-23-06, 03:47 AM
  #45  
Senior Member

 
rarson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not convinced the rotary is developed enough to be a good, reliable way of making big hp numbers. Obviously there are people who have done it before, but for our street cars that get used and abused all the time, the big turbo rotary is hit-or-miss enough that I'd forego the hassle.

Now N/A rotaries, on the other hand, seemed to have pretty much proven their reliability and aside from the weight, I think a 13b puts out competitive numbers when compared to a naturally-aspirated 4-cylinder (the Renesis is even better).

My point is that I'm not really pro one or the other. The rotary is good for what it is, and I'm sure as **** glad that Mazda is still using them, because it needs the extra years of development that the piston engine has had.

I can really understand arguments (intelligent ones, that is) from both sides, and honestly there's not enough to either one to make me choose one way or the other. Thank God that there are people on both sides that are pushing the engines though because it would be boring as hell if we were all driving around with the same engines.
Old 05-23-06, 11:21 AM
  #46  
moon ******

 
Nihilanthic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rarson
Thank God that there are people on both sides that are pushing the engines though because it would be boring as hell if we were all driving around with the same engines.
Just wanna throw this in here...

Do you know how many different ways you can tune the exact same engine?

The variances between the different rotaries or different piston motors are extreme... rotary/piston is a false duality.
Old 05-23-06, 11:57 AM
  #47  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (10)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,085
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Sport Compact Car Magazine is doing an article comparing a 350rwhp FD against an LS1 powered FD and that should hopefully shed more light on this highly debated topic. They just tested the cars within the last week or two so the article should be out in 60-90 days.

After seeing my friends blow up multiple turbo 13B's and turbo 20B's I'm glad I went LS1. I have 20K miles on this combo and have simply changed the oil on it and cleaned the air filter. I'm actually running the same spark plugs I put it together with.
Old 05-23-06, 12:11 PM
  #48  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,507
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by rarson
I'm not convinced the rotary is developed enough to be a good, reliable way of making big hp numbers. Obviously there are people who have done it before, but for our street cars that get used and abused all the time, the big turbo rotary is hit-or-miss enough that I'd forego the hassle.
True, and *on the street*, I find that I can't even use my stockport 12A's full power potential unless I have maybe 600 pounds of steel stock under the hatch, and even then the opportunities are fleeting. (Makes handling "interesting" too )

When talking about street cars, ultimate performance potential is right out the window. It's almost so unimportant as to be a non-issue, since opportunities to *use* that potential are few and far between. Therefore it all boils down to driving characteristics, and how they mesh with what the driver desires.
Old 05-23-06, 03:13 PM
  #49  
No it's not Turbo'd

 
DCrosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I just wanted to say a couple of words,

I was a rotorhead, I bought anything and everything rotary, incl. models key chains etc... Heck I still have a bunch of parts in my closet / garage, but once my 3'rd motor went, and I've only owned a RX-7 since 2002, that's roughly .75 motors a year, even though they were not that evenly spaced out... the fact remained I wanted to be competitive on the street and the track, and not get challenged for a gap on the freeway, by a guy in an $80k+ Porches day in and day out. So the requirement to have it be fast, beautiful, and reliable were too much to ask of the 7 it seemed like I could have 2 / 3, and I want 3/3 and that required and engine swap.

Rotary soul or not, hp / vs weight whatever... it was the right decision for me, and I agonized over it for quite some time, it's been arduous, my car has been in the shop since Nov. and is still not done, due to complications. I still none the less feel it was the RIGHT decision for me.

Anybody who does things Rotary or Pistons, because someone "Told" them it was better is a FOOL ! YOU need to do things because they are right for YOU not for someone else that you're trying to impress / make happy / insert excuse here _____ ....

You'll never be truly happy if you let your friends make choices for you, and you will loose friends, due to that fact. Make up your own mind what's right for YOU and move on... Right or Wrong it was YOUR decision at the time, and you made it with the best set of information you had...

Last edited by DCrosby; 05-23-06 at 03:16 PM.
Old 05-23-06, 04:41 PM
  #50  
Zero Rotor Motorsports

iTrader: (1)
 
Crash Test Joey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCrosby
Right or Wrong it was YOUR decision at the time, and you made it with the best set of information you had...
But if the best information you have comes from Doridori, would you feel like you had enough to make an intelligent decision, or do you think you may run into even more complications? Personally, I think some of the bullshit he puts out there is enough to make an RX7 owner want to sell their car and upgrade to a Yugo.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 AM.