FC LT1 Or LS1 Single Turbo Set-Ups?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FC LT1 Or LS1 Single Turbo Set-Ups?
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone here has a Single Turbo Set-Up on a LT1 or LS1 FC? I have seen quite a few people mentioning that they were/are going to do it, but don't think I have seen anyone that HAS done it yet.
If you have a successful set up please post pics of it, with the details of what has been done etc. I would really like to see it.
Appreciate it.
Thanks!
I was wondering if anyone here has a Single Turbo Set-Up on a LT1 or LS1 FC? I have seen quite a few people mentioning that they were/are going to do it, but don't think I have seen anyone that HAS done it yet.
If you have a successful set up please post pics of it, with the details of what has been done etc. I would really like to see it.
Appreciate it.
Thanks!
#4
Attack Gas Station!!!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Catonsville, Maryland
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have seen it (single turbo ls1 for a very small engine compartment) done in a book I own called "Maximum Boost" by Corky Bell.
No FC specific stuff though, sorry.
No FC specific stuff though, sorry.
#5
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there's a guy in Daytona that has one. Auto tranny, and runs high 9's. I can't argue that it's straight line quick, I just think he's full of it, when it comes down to actual handling. he pussied out on the last auto-X.
#7
registered user
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a guy in san diego at a local car show with a single turbo LS1 FC. I talked with him for a few minutes, and came away with the idea that he did it for the awe factor, and that it was a dyno queen. It doesn't seem like it would be worth the added complexity. It would never be usefull when compared to an NA LS1 in anything but drag racing, and only with actual slicks. The LS1 can handle a significant amount of N2O and you would get the same drag race benefit from nitrous with less cost, complexity and weight when compared with a turbo.
Trending Topics
#10
Power = Cubic Dollars
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
slo, "what if.." you were to replace the stock diff with.... let's say a Ford 9", made for a fox body mustang with granny's kit to adapt it to the RX7....????
Then, would it NOT be a dyno queen?
Then, would it NOT be a dyno queen?
#11
registered user
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe, but this car was defanatly a dyno queen/show car because there is no way you could drive it close to its limitations with the stock diff. And the owner made a comment like, "The stock diff handled multiple 600+ HP dyno runs"
I broke a stock (N/A) diff with my no torque rotary engine.
I broke a stock (N/A) diff with my no torque rotary engine.
#12
Rotary Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JesterJess
slo, "what if.." you were to replace the stock diff with.... let's say a Ford 9", made for a fox body mustang with granny's kit to adapt it to the RX7....????
Then, would it NOT be a dyno queen?
Then, would it NOT be a dyno queen?
#14
Full Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it might severly hurt the cars handling, but if your building a boosted LS1 for a rx7, then i think the last thing on your mind is handling. your building a purpose build straightline monster speed car that will scare you everytime you get on the pedal. to me, i'd take that over handling anyday...and i like handling.
for handling, your better off on a cam/bolt on ls1 with a nitrous shot. there you'll have good power n/a to provide a balanced car in speed and handling. and for dyno queen shows or that fast straightline drag car rush, the 150shot will be there for you.
for handling, your better off on a cam/bolt on ls1 with a nitrous shot. there you'll have good power n/a to provide a balanced car in speed and handling. and for dyno queen shows or that fast straightline drag car rush, the 150shot will be there for you.
#15
Rotary Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Orr89rocz
it might severly hurt the cars handling, but if your building a boosted LS1 for a rx7, then i think the last thing on your mind is handling. your building a purpose build straightline monster speed car that will scare you everytime you get on the pedal. to me, i'd take that over handling anyday...and i like handling.
#16
Full Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, i see two points... one, to be different and use a rx7 since they are a good lookin car. also sorta of a sleeper as u wouldnt expect a v8 in that car
two, its a lighter chassis than the fbody and will require less hp to run fast. one of the fastest pump gas cars in the country is a twin turbo 1200hp ls1 rx7..it was in HOT RODS pump gas drags. it was really fast. 8 second 1/4s for sure, i dont remember the specs
two, its a lighter chassis than the fbody and will require less hp to run fast. one of the fastest pump gas cars in the country is a twin turbo 1200hp ls1 rx7..it was in HOT RODS pump gas drags. it was really fast. 8 second 1/4s for sure, i dont remember the specs
#17
Power = Cubic Dollars
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NOPR... WHY NOT???
I don't know how much some of you kow about cars, but by the statements that you make, seem to make me belive that your knowledge or experiences have limited your views. You can make a straight axle car handle JUST as good as a IRS rear, with more reliability, and definitely more duribility.
Our goal is to build a sleepr that can be driven for long distances and not be woried about breaking down. Also, we would like this car to be VERY quick, and yet retain a good driveability. Even if we convert this to a straight axle car, it will be done in a way that will maintain driveability and handling. He does not want to build a "drag queen" or a "dyno queen". His intentions are not to race this car at the track, but make it a nice street car.
I don't know how much some of you kow about cars, but by the statements that you make, seem to make me belive that your knowledge or experiences have limited your views. You can make a straight axle car handle JUST as good as a IRS rear, with more reliability, and definitely more duribility.
Our goal is to build a sleepr that can be driven for long distances and not be woried about breaking down. Also, we would like this car to be VERY quick, and yet retain a good driveability. Even if we convert this to a straight axle car, it will be done in a way that will maintain driveability and handling. He does not want to build a "drag queen" or a "dyno queen". His intentions are not to race this car at the track, but make it a nice street car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
5
01-11-16 04:08 PM
stickmantijuana
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-21-15 08:35 PM