FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #226  
slo's Avatar
slo
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
+1 standard 5.0 blocks are a dime a dozen

Originally Posted by turbojeff
I'm not an expert on block repair. Was that the Crown Vic block with the crack?

What exactly did you repair the block with? Why didn't you just get a used block?

It seems like you could pick up an entire motor for $500 or less, a bare block should be really cheap.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #227  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
The robust solution would have been to find another block in the same (good) condition as my original, rebore it, and go from there. But finding good used blocks around here takes some digging and I was on a tight schedule, so I had a local machinist bore and sleeve the bad cylinder.

It all came down to opportunity cost, which, at the time, was very expensive.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #228  
digitalsolo's Avatar
RX-347
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 1
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Hmm, glad you got it back together. I followed your paint thread very closely, and your pain saved me quite a bit when I did the repaint on my 7.

Almost time for some warm air now...
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 04:30 AM
  #229  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
So I weighed the car yesterday. With me and a backpack in the passenger compartment, it was 1450 pounds on the front axle and 1500 over the rear (this with a nearly full tank of fuel). I estimate my weight to be 200ish pounds including the backpack.

So she appears to weigh 2750 pounds with 49/51 f/r weight distribution.

I haven't forgot about getting numbers and a video of the beast in action.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 04:56 AM
  #230  
astrochild7's Avatar
controlled kaos
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 908
Likes: 1
From: eugene, or
hell yeah dude.. I'm glad to see your still enjoying your tinkering.. me I've just gone mad.. you should see my hobby shop I'm filling with cars/parts
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #231  
Merc63's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: People's Republic of Maryland
Originally Posted by 88IntegraLS
So I weighed the car yesterday. With me and a backpack in the passenger compartment, it was 1450 pounds on the front axle and 1500 over the rear (this with a nearly full tank of fuel). I estimate my weight to be 200ish pounds including the backpack.

So she appears to weigh 2750 pounds with 49/51 f/r weight distribution.

I haven't forgot about getting numbers and a video of the beast in action.

You got pretty much the exact numbers I got on my '86 5.0 RX7, except mine came in at 2720 lbs total.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #232  
hpfiend's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Wow- what a great thread---

You did a really nice job putting that baby in there with professional creativity....

I have a supercharged aluminum head, intake, lopey cam EFI 5.0 setup that has already been dyno tuned with sct software by the guys that wrote the book, literally, for sct. Rob and Don LaSota. I am having a heck of a time selling the mustang so I am going to take the drivetrain and put it into a FC...

I am debating whether I want to do it your way or grannys way and refab the front crossmember for radiator clearance of my blower/accessories... I can weld decently but I dont know if I trust my skills to 435 hp and 1 g cornering at the motor mounts... I guess I could tack weld it and have it professionally finished...

Have you had any issues with your cantilever tranny mount?

Do the valvecovers/intake manifold rub the firewall at all?

Do you have 6" of clearance on your oil pan at stock suspension height or full suspension travel?

As far as your clutch pedal effort- thats about normal with a king cobra clutch- stiff as hell- at least compared to a lot of cars- you get used to it though- its nothing in your design just part of the shi@#% design- I will tell you however that a maximum motorsports universal cable (non adjustable), a firewall adjuster, and their aluminum quadrant with more leverage made it a LOT better- still I am looking forward to a hydraulic setup...

I am sorry to hear about your engine failure- but heck at least you were enjoying it when it happened- it would be worse if you were idling at a grocery store...

Hard to tell if you have already rebuilt it or not but just in case...

FWIW I would recommend the blown short stroke setup- I LOVE it the blower more than makes up for the low torque of the low displacement and it revs incredibly fast-and the more you rev it the more power it makes with a centrifugal until you get out of the efficiency range of the blower which with stock pulleys is beyond hte short blocks limit usually... I would ditch the cam though as it hurts boost and kills mileage/driveability- put a 93 cobra cam or stock 5.0 ho cam in... that is what I am doing after I get it sucessfully into an FC and blow it up- 1.7 rockers and more boost wil lmore than make up for a cam... I know you already invested in 1.6 rollers- so did I - btw are yours noisy? which brand did you go with? my trickflows like others have reported are like a "sewing machine on crack".

Also not sure if you know this or not but a 351 windsor block has a taller deck height than your 302 windsor and your AFR heads and intake will not work with it... Headers are different too if I remember correctly

Last edited by hpfiend; Mar 31, 2008 at 11:43 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #233  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Hi,

Originally Posted by hpfiend
Wow- what a great thread---

You did a really nice job putting that baby in there with professional creativity....
Thanks! It's been quite a good time since it's been drivable.

I am debating whether I want to do it your way or grannys way and refab the front crossmember for radiator clearance of my blower/accessories... I can weld decently but I dont know if I trust my skills to 435 hp and 1 g cornering at the motor mounts... I guess I could tack weld it and have it professionally finished...
Wire feed is pretty easy. If you practice on scrap steel you can get to the point of laying acceptably strong beads. My welds are pretty amateur and they have shown no signs of cracking during a few thousand miles of punishment (granted this engine only has an estimated 300-350 bhp)

Have you had any issues with your cantilever tranny mount?
It looked great the last time I had the engine out. That was with a couple thousand miles of thrashing on it. I think the weak point in the design is the bolt-through points on the chassis, and they look fine, too.

Do the valvecovers/intake manifold rub the firewall at all?
No, but a bolt that I used to plug a mysterious exhaust passage on the back of the AFR heads tends to smack the firewall at times. If I ever have the heads off again, I'll get a real flush allen head plug for the holes. I still don't know that they're for (egr possibly).

Do you have 6" of clearance on your oil pan at stock suspension height or full suspension travel?
It's 6" with tokico blue shocks and eibach progressive rate springs, with the pads removed from the top off the strut to lower the car more. So I have a fairly low FC compared to stock. To date I have not scraped the oil pan on anything (speed bumps, driveways, rocks, etc.)

As far as your clutch pedal effort- thats about normal with a king cobra clutch- stiff as hell- at least compared to a lot of cars- you get used to it though- its nothing in your design just part of the shi@#% design- I will tell you however that a maximum motorsports universal cable (non adjustable), a firewall adjuster, and their aluminum quadrant with more leverage made it a LOT better- still I am looking forward to a hydraulic setup...
That sounds great. I think it's the friction from the kink in the cable where it goes around the brake booster that makes it worse than it should be. But it's good to give the legs a workout.

FWIW I would recommend the blown short stroke setup- I LOVE it the blower more than makes up for the low torque of the low displacement and it revs incredibly fast-and the more you rev it the more power it makes with a centrifugal until you get out of the efficiency range of the blower which with stock pulleys is beyond hte short blocks limit usually... I would ditch the cam though as it hurts boost and kills mileage/driveability- put a 93 cobra cam or stock 5.0 ho cam in... that is what I am doing after I get it sucessfully into an FC and blow it up- 1.7 rockers and more boost wil lmore than make up for a cam... I know you already invested in 1.6 rollers- so did I - btw are yours noisy? which brand did you go with? my trickflows like others have reported are like a "sewing machine on crack".
Lol, that's a perfect analogy. It is definitely like a giant sewing machine. I think my rockers were crane 1.73's but it's been a while since I checked. The sound gets drowned out by the glorioius SBF intake roar. I do have the engine rebuilt and running again, and some form of centrifugal supercharger will be the most likely power adder down the road. All I could ask for is a little more top end after 4k rpm, and the blower should handle that with a few psi.

Also not sure if you know this or not but a 351 windsor block has a taller deck height than your 302 windsor and your AFR heads and intake will not work with it... Headers are different too if I remember correctly

Hmm. Yeah I discarded the idea of a 351W after I saw how hard they are to find with a roller cam. It is surely a taller engine though and I agree: the tfs intake would hit the hood.

I love the car! It's like crack every time I get done with a back road bash session.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #234  
hpfiend's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Thanks for your reply-

Those holes in the back of your afr heads are for the air passages from the smog pump system. My trickflow heads had them too- I believe it was 5/8" coarse thread.

enjoy
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #235  
dat-13b's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Great thread. Sounds just like what I want my FC swap to turn out like. Too bad the pics are not still up. I would really like to see the crossmember and firewall mods. I would prefer to set my engine back and low instead of the typical granny's mount location. Anyone have the pics saved? I tried PMing 88IntegraLS but haven't heard back.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #236  
jleews6's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: va
Cool project.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #237  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Hi guys,

Yes my university web hosting account expired, since I graduated. Update on the car:

Running great! I got about 60 miles of back road action with it yesterday in Alabama's rural highways. Yes, Alabama. I got a job at an aerospace manufacturer about four months ago and they moved me, my cars, and all my stuff here free of cost so I could help keep the composites plant running. Fab experience is priceless in a real manufacturing environment. Educrat engineers can't get **** done; ex-farmboy hacks are the complete opposite.

So, the car is still its usual self, a ground pounding howling 5.0 powered FC, smoking tires in first and second gear just rolling on the throttle, leaping off the line like a bright yellow jungle animal taking out a gazelle.

I don't yet have any web hosting here but I'll describe the cross member. It is just a 1.5" square piece of steel tubing with 1/4" thick steel pads welded to its ends, at an angle matching the angle of the existing K member where the stock rotary mount hard points were. Two rubber mount brackets for the 5.0 are then triangulated up from the ends of this bar to locate the new engine. Once this was made and bolted to the motor, it was all dropped in the car and test fit to determine how to make the tranny mount and how far to hammer back the firewall. It's actually pretty simple. Just get your core motor, hang it in the engine bay, see what you need to fab and / or hammer out of the way, and then build.

Anyhow, the car is totally fun. It's bailed out my Probe GT twice now when I crashed it into a tree one day, and just recently when it wouldn't start one morning because the distributor died. The 5.0 has been trouble free. The oil pan has yet to scrape pavement, after about 10k miles of back road bashing.

Anyone contemplating the V8 swap: DO IT! The finished product is a different animal and fun in a different way. And it is totally superior, by the way.

Last edited by 88IntegraLS; Nov 23, 2008 at 09:49 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #238  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Here are some build pics of the subframe, firewall, and tranny mount. I have thrashed this car for about a year and the tranny mount is holding up.
Attached Thumbnails FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford07.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford08.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford09.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford10.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford11.jpg  

Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #239  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Modded oil pan, engine sitting in bay, and fuel line routing through the wheel well:
Attached Thumbnails FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford13.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford14.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford16.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford28.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford31.jpg  

Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #240  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Modded TII driveshaft, motor build pics and location of T5 shift lever after install:
Attached Thumbnails FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford32.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford38.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford48.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford55.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford58.jpg  

Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #241  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Motor installed with stock intake, oil pan ground clearance, exhaust fabrication:
Attached Thumbnails FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford75.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford76.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford79.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford87.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford88.jpg  

Reply
Old Dec 20, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #242  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Some pics of the final product. I'm still doing redneck experiments with insulation, aluminum foil, and cardboard.

The car is fast.
Attached Thumbnails FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford203.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford204.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford209.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford210.jpg   FC + 89 Crown Vic 5.0-ford211.jpg  

Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #243  
brycer's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Awsome build. I love how far back you have the engine sitting give lots of room for future additions(turbos).
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #244  
ls1hybrid's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Thank you for reposting the pictures. They will be used as inspiration for sure.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #245  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
The nice thing about living in rural Alabama is there are no smog rules. I'm about to reinstall the hot cam and redo the exhaust. A little overlap and some longtubes should bump up the top end a little.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 06:57 AM
  #246  
rotaryconcepts007's Avatar
no mo rotard
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 236
Likes: 1
From: gloucester ,va
very nice setup im doing the sameswap in my fc how bad was the wiring and other small stuff?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #247  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
The small stuff and wiring took months! The fun part was getting the motor to fit. The work was getting it to run.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #248  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Update:

Motor is still running great! I took a senior engineer for a ride in it the other day and he said it pulled like a viper he test drove. I'm pretty impressed with the small block ford at this point. It sounds great and has a very usable power band. I'm still using the E303 cam with a pretty restrictive exhaust (stock main cats). I'm not sure what I'm going to do to it next. It needs gauges and other items of civility more than anything else.

The sleeved block has not shown any signs of trouble. And it gets 93 octane at all times.
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 03:56 AM
  #249  
kosh1st's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, BC
Hey man i just finished reading this whole thread from the beginning lol. I'm in the process of swaping in a 351w and was wondering if the same modifications that you have done for the 302 would work for the 351 ie the firewall smashing and the oil pan mod? How hard was it to cut out the ***** of oil pan and weld ing that new piece? How much work is involved with mounting the engine down and behind the rack as you did compared to the granny's mounting method?
Reply
Old May 10, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #250  
kosh1st's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, BC
Another question, I'm lining up my motor in the same place as you right now and i realised that this placement wont allow for the steering rack lines on the backside. Did you have to depower your steering rack? If not how did you get around this?

Edit: I noticed that your rack is different than mine. Which rack are you using?

Last edited by kosh1st; May 10, 2009 at 03:37 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.