any mid rear conversions yet ?
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All good points and it would be a lot of R&D the hard way. I had a 93 Rx7 just think its the most beautiful car around. I built and drove a 500 hp 914 / SBC / stick and loved the build. Now I have a 4500 lb 05 CL65 and its nice but I can't start cutting that car up LOL. I've watched a few videos of the LS conversions and am impressed as hell.
OK, LS7 would be wonderful !
OK, LS7 would be wonderful !
Trending Topics
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Fiero is an interesting swap, one would have to change allot more than the engine package. I think any up grade in HP like this needs a chassis and brakes at the very least which is a match for it to work correctly. I see too many conversions done on a small budget, can't blame someone because money is always a factor. I would like to start with a clear image in mind, problem is I don't have one as yet. In a perfect world I would like a tube chassis wrapped with the FD. These cars are light and built for a rotary/low torque power plant. The FD has a incredible amount of potential because it came from the factory with a great suspension. I think its one the most beautiful shaped cars of all time. I loved my 914 but it just looks like a book LOL. Your LSX setup is stating to grow on me !
#13
死*神*
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there is a kit to use the LS family of motors for the fiero and they arent as scary as youd expect (handles relatively well anyway). I did see a guy put a ll0 in the trunk of a saturn but he had a ton of problems getting the damn thing to work properly. I would just say screw it, if you got the skills and knowledge than do it, but other wise it might not be worth the effort. might even be a very very bad idea and the 50/50 would be more like 80/20. now thatd be scary in a turn or two
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've thought about. I'd base around the Mendola SD5R transaxle. It is only good up to 650 hp, so maybe a destroked LS7 for power. I currently run a 459 RWHP turbo rotary FC weighing 2300 lbs and running 12" wide Yokohama road race slicks. To be worth it, the Mid engine car would have to be sub 1800 lbs. I like the transaxle and diff as one component and moving the center of momentum to the middle of the car. I daily drive a slightly worked Porsche Cayman S, and I've tracked it. The balance is great, shame about the poor stock brakes.
My $0.02
-Trent
My $0.02
-Trent
#15
Doesn't suck
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pensacola FL
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be honest this sounds like mindless mid engine leg humping, the kind you find often on car forums when the discussion involves things including but not limited to:
German engineering
JDM
Supras
Skylines
Mid engine cars
IRTB's
Ferrari
What are you trying to improve upon with a mid engine set-up? The driving dynamics/balance of these cars are possibly the most universally praised aspects and you're tossing that out. There is a 90% chance that IF you complete the project it will be inferior to the stock arrangement.
What's wrong with a nice v8 swap?
German engineering
JDM
Supras
Skylines
Mid engine cars
IRTB's
Ferrari
What are you trying to improve upon with a mid engine set-up? The driving dynamics/balance of these cars are possibly the most universally praised aspects and you're tossing that out. There is a 90% chance that IF you complete the project it will be inferior to the stock arrangement.
What's wrong with a nice v8 swap?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
08-18-15 05:30 PM