Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

stock 1/4 mile times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 12:39 AM
  #1  
lcplratliff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: florida
stock 1/4 mile times

well not sure were to put this

1979 Mazda RX-7 GS 9.2 17.0
1982 Mazda RX-7 GSL 9.7 N/A
1983 Mazda RX-7 GS 9.5 17.0
1984 Mazda RX-7 GSL-SE 7.8 15.9
1985 Mazda RX-7 GSL 9.9 17.4
1986 Mazda RX-7 GXL 8.5 16.5
1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo 6.6 15.2
1988 Mazda RX-7 Conv. 9.7 17.5
1989 Mazda RX-7 GTU 8.5 16.5
1989 Mazda RX-7 Turbo 6.7 15.1
1990 Mazda RX-7 GTU 8.6 16.7
1990 Mazda RX-7 Turbo II 6.3 14.9
1991 Mazda RX-7 Conv. 8.8 16.7
1991 Mazda RX-7 Infini IV 7.0 14.9
1993 Mazda RX-7 5.5 14.0
1993 Mazda RX-7 R1 5.3 13.9
1994 Mazda RX-7 5.3 14.0
1994 Mazda RX-7 Touring 6.0 14.5 (auto)
1995 Mazda RX-7 R2 5.0 14.0
2004 Mazda RX-8 5.8 14.49 (6 speed) (MT Mar '04)
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:10 AM
  #2  
AmviciousRav's Avatar
GTR
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: The 916
eh, I think real time slips are better than finding phony times, My friend had a 1988 bone stock TII and pulled 14.7 with nothing taken out of the car and he weighs around 220, according to those times he should of been running 15.2 haha
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #3  
all_about_imports's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: iowa
Talking

Originally Posted by AmviciousRav
eh, I think real time slips are better than finding phony times, My friend had a 1988 bone stock TII and pulled 14.7 with nothing taken out of the car and he weighs around 220, according to those times he should of been running 15.2 haha
maybe the driver just doesnt know how to drive lol it says my 86 gxl should get 16.5 but i personally got a 15.9 in it
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 12:35 AM
  #4  
saftysizrs's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: fredericton, nb
i have a bone stock 87 turbo ran 14.93 with way to tall tires (26"tall et streets) and my clutch was bad so shifting was slow.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 07:53 PM
  #5  
FC3Sdrift's Avatar
Displacement Replacement
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
From: St. Thomas
elevation and conditions has a role in the times

was that in miramichi

Good ol' fredericton , if you see a rice bag in a silver civic hatch named Tod Martin, show him what a real car does
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
slippery1's Avatar
shut the $#!! up
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Thumbs down

Yeah way off I have a 88 fc n/a with turbo engine (low compression) and I just took it out and rana 15.9 and with crappy tires think its a little off.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZt4qDe3QAg
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2013 | 12:11 AM
  #7  
murphy808's Avatar
Can Post Only in New Member Section
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
2/9/2013 just got my 1979 rx7 non turbo to run 14.91 on stock 13" st tires. AT MAUI RACEWAY PARK I AM A HAPPY MAN!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2013 | 12:24 PM
  #8  
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 246
Likes: 1
From: NC
'90 GTU vs. '91 Vert

With a fairly large weight discrepancy, I doubt these two would run the same 16.7..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Aug 15, 2015 10:06 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.