87 t2 bnr stg 4 dyno
07-18-12, 09:12 PM
#26
deff these cheap *** injectors i got im having simular problems another guy did on here . before secondays kick in its in the 11s and then secondarys on it will be in the 12-13s then almost 17 before redline so i know its one of these junlk tlf performace injecters .
07-19-12, 10:20 AM
#29
Displacement Replacement
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Thomas
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what octane are you running??? I always had problems where I would have to add more fuel when i tried running 94 i got my best results using 91 octane
07-19-12, 12:43 PM
#31
lol no. i really do not care for the Rtek 2.0/2.1 with the palm and a bajillion cells to modify 1 click at a time. might be able to get by with 1000cc primaries but it won't be ideal. it is designed to work with 4X720cc injectors with 75% adjustability? then it should work with those primaries
07-19-12, 06:04 PM
#32
On a 2.0/2/1, the largest combo you could get away with would be approx. 720/1200. At least one person has tried 1600cc secondaries, and it just dumped fuel when the secondaries kicked on.
If you use larger primaries, you'll have all sorts of trouble with idle, mixture under vacuum and closed loop operation.
If you use larger primaries, you'll have all sorts of trouble with idle, mixture under vacuum and closed loop operation.
07-21-12, 06:11 PM
#33
^^^ Exactly.
As far as the leaning out, once you have verified fuel pressure and pump voltage under load I would look into obstructions in your fuel system, you would be amazed at the nooks and crannies (and injector baskets) sediment can find its way into.
As far as the leaning out, once you have verified fuel pressure and pump voltage under load I would look into obstructions in your fuel system, you would be amazed at the nooks and crannies (and injector baskets) sediment can find its way into.
10-02-12, 03:40 AM
#34
BRAAAAAP pssh BRAAAAAP
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: cali
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car looks and sounds very nice!
Constructive criticism:
"1988 mazda rx-8" ?
Exhaust tips stock out too far
Numbers are low (if this is the 14.5 psi run). For reference a buddy recently did 300 @ on a stage 1 at 15psi. (granted, this was on an s5 t2 w/ mild SP it was also at roughly 6k rpm)
What afr were you seeing @ 14 psi?
The 2.1 would definitely make it easier and safer to get higher numbers. Data logging would make it much easier to figure out whats holding you back.
Constructive criticism:
"1988 mazda rx-8" ?
Exhaust tips stock out too far
Numbers are low (if this is the 14.5 psi run). For reference a buddy recently did 300 @ on a stage 1 at 15psi. (granted, this was on an s5 t2 w/ mild SP it was also at roughly 6k rpm)
What afr were you seeing @ 14 psi?
The 2.1 would definitely make it easier and safer to get higher numbers. Data logging would make it much easier to figure out whats holding you back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
05-09-16 07:06 PM
matty
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
10-06-15 09:13 PM
