Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Softest Shocks?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #26  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
All springs are the same on every FD except for the '99 spec which got new rates. The base, touring and R1 all had exactly the same springs from the factory; only the dampers were different.

Remember that the Koni perches show a much larger drop at the wheel due to the way the dampers mount to the suspension; a small change in spring position makes a much larger one at the wheel. I can tell you that with stock springs and the Koni perches at their lowest setting the car is pretty slammed.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #27  
arutha's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Well I have to admit I guess I was a little confused with shocks/struts. I always assumed that if the shock and spring were connected to each other then it was a strut. I am used to shocks being able to be changed without messing with the springs.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 01:51 PM
  #28  
rajeevx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
Again, my search for stock ride height brought up so many varying opinions and 'facts' that a decisive answer was not found.

I have taken into consideration what you are saying Damon. Koni *most likely* measures their adjustment on the actual damper body as opposed to the wheel well. That seems like a better route to me, just save $ and use my stock R1 springs and mid perch setting on the front Koni's and lowest perch on the rear.

No decision has been reached, but all my parts are coming via mail right now.

Raj
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 01:52 PM
  #29  
rajeevx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
I want the car a pretty low, but *even* from front to back, level. No more nose down garbage.

Raj
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #30  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally posted by arutha
Well I have to admit I guess I was a little confused with shocks/struts. I always assumed that if the shock and spring were connected to each other then it was a strut. I am used to shocks being able to be changed without messing with the springs.
The term "coil-over" refers to the spring being around the shock. Of course, we use that term even more loosely than shock/strut! The FD has coil-overs from the factory, but we usually mean threaded-body, height-adjustable coil-overs when we say "coil over" around here.

Another fun tid-bit: the Chapman Strut suspension design uses struts that aren't coil-overs.

-Max
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #31  
wreckless's Avatar
still looking
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: indy
"well look who thinks he's 'clever Dan'..."

hey guys, was it so hard to take the basic auto class in high school? it was the only class where i really learned something useful EVERYDAY. even if not, read "car repair for dummies". that'll at least get you up to speed with all the proper terminology.


and the hybrid thing- an intresting theory; i like the cut of your jib.

and oh yeah..... bump
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #32  
arutha's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally posted by maxcooper
The term "coil-over" refers to the spring being around the shock. Of course, we use that term even more loosely than shock/strut! The FD has coil-overs from the factory, but we usually mean threaded-body, height-adjustable coil-overs when we say "coil over" around here.

Another fun tid-bit: the Chapman Strut suspension design uses struts that aren't coil-overs.

-Max
I am old so I think of coil springs, leaf springs, and torsion bars. Oh well. Heck I just learned yesterday of the whole hub centric ring stuff. Guess I need to call and find out if my Volks are coming with them.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #33  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
i use Bilstiens and i prefered the ride to my touring shocks. IT seemed like they rode better but i also had them mated to H&R springs. Once i changed the springs to HKS springs the ride was alot harsher. But just for your info the bilstiens are top rated. Most of my friends use them on thier M3's and the ride is great. True mono tube self adjusting design. You will like the ride of these shocks paired with either the stock springs or a progressive rate spring like H&R. The shock is a true street or strip and last a very very long time. You will likely sell the car long before the shocks need to be replaced again.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 10:51 PM
  #34  
rajeevx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
2 FD's since '98
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 7
From: West Palm Beach
Zoom - Thanks for the input. I know Bilstiens come OEM on some cars, a fact that varifies thier worth.

I have already purchased Koni's. I am REALLY not fond of the softest setting not being as soft as stock, but I chose for adjustment over stock non dynamic rates.

Koni's, 285-40-17
255-45-17
Eibach springs...
all waiting to go on this weekend. I will post results here.

Raj
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 02:12 AM
  #35  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Your tire sizes are way too tall, you will hit the fender liner up front for sure.

The proper size for your fronts should be 255/40. For the rear, 275/40 is at the reasonable limit, 285/40 is probably beyond it.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:23 PM
  #36  
roadsterdoc's Avatar
94 FD, 69 Datsun Roadster
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
H&R with Bilstein is the setup I am considering. My goal is street comfort and slightly lowered.

Why did you change to HKS springs?

Originally posted by ZoomZoom
i use Bilstiens and i prefered the ride to my touring shocks. IT seemed like they rode better but i also had them mated to H&R springs. Once i changed the springs to HKS springs the ride was alot harsher. But just for your info the bilstiens are top rated. Most of my friends use them on thier M3's and the ride is great. True mono tube self adjusting design. You will like the ride of these shocks paired with either the stock springs or a progressive rate spring like H&R. The shock is a true street or strip and last a very very long time. You will likely sell the car long before the shocks need to be replaced again.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #37  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally posted by DamonB
All springs are the same on every FD except for the '99 spec which got new rates. The base, touring and R1 all had exactly the same springs from the factory; only the dampers were different.
Actually, I believe Mazda changed the springs for the 94/95 model. They are a little taller, and a little softer. It is a different part number after 93. The intent was to soften up the ride, and reduce oversteer. Basically, to make the car a little more user friendly.


I have been told that the soft setting on the Tokico Illumina's is similar to the stock (non R1/R2) shocks.

Last edited by adam c; Mar 18, 2004 at 01:55 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 03:28 PM
  #38  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally posted by DamonB
All springs are the same on every FD except for the '99 spec which got new rates.
Damon, do you have any details regarding the 99+ springs? I notice you can buy them from Mazdamotorsports and they're inexpensive.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 10:34 PM
  #39  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
SEMI-PRO
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 36
From: New Jersey
Originally posted by roadsterdoc
H&R with Bilstein is the setup I am considering. My goal is street comfort and slightly lowered.

Why did you change to HKS springs?
I changed due to the rate and the ride height. I needed soemthing to accomidate the huge tires i put up front. The stock wheel/tires worked fine with the Bilsteins and H&R's. It rode nice and handled like a Slot car. I liked them but i needed to raise the car up a bit. i didnt want stock ride height so I went with the least drop available. The HKS super sports fit the bill. But the ride is 3x harsher with the HKS springs. I still had to roll the fenders up front for my 255 35 18 inch tires but i wish i could use the H&R's with my bilsteins. That is definatly my favorite combo for the FD.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #40  
rotary-tt's Avatar
2 babies - no back seats
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
From: N. Wilm., Delaware?
Originally posted by adam c
Actually, I believe Mazda changed the springs for the 94/95 model. They are a little taller, and a little softer. It is a different part number after 93. The intent was to soften up the ride, and reduce oversteer. Basically, to make the car a little more user friendly.


I have been told that the soft setting on the Tokico Illumina's is similar to the stock (non R1/R2) shocks.
The soft setting on my Tokico's almost makes the car undriveable. Floats like a Caddy with 150k mi on the shocks
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 04:15 PM
  #41  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally posted by rynberg
Damon, do you have any details regarding the 99+ springs?
I've been meaning to ask them about the rates for a while but I keep forgetting when I call them. I know they're stiffer, but I don't know how much.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
Ernstudet22
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
6
Sep 14, 2015 09:19 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.