Ratio of Front and Rear Braking?
#3
Hi Powr FD's
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: OKC
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How exactly are you noticing that your rear brakes fade more?
Anyways, maybe the emergency brakes been catching *shrug*
I know on FWD cars that its about 70%front and 30% rear braking power.
I didnt know if RWDs were the same.
#4
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by HeatTreated
??? huh? its called brake dust covering the rear wheels and non on the front ones!
??? huh? its called brake dust covering the rear wheels and non on the front ones!
First check to see if the rear wheels turn freely while the car is on stands to verify the e-brake is free. If the wheels are not hanging up then what type of pads do you have front and rear?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bartlesville, OK.
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Eric, if you're seeing significantly different amounts of dusting, it may just be that the front brake pads have been replaced with something besides OEM pads. This could also affect brake performance and potentially lead to some fade effects, but the amount of dust is not the same issue.
Almost all street cars will have significantly higher front brake bias because, (1) the weight transfer under braking means that the front brakes do more work, (2) its considered 'safer' to lock the front brakes than the back (because locking the back tends to make a car swap ends), and (3) anti-lock brake systems work better when the bias is set even higher toward the front than non-anti-lock. (Remember the videos showing cars going straight ahead while trying to perform panic stops in the water).
Maximum stopping power comes just after the tires starts to slip a small amount. Not fully locked, but no longer rolling at the vehicle’s full speed either. It's tuff to achieve this in a street car, and even some race cars. Generally anti-lock aids in handling during emergency braking situations, but at a real and measurable small loss in absolute stopping distance. For the 7 and most other street cars this means the front brakes lock well before mazimum braking is achieved by the back tires.
Almost all street cars will have significantly higher front brake bias because, (1) the weight transfer under braking means that the front brakes do more work, (2) its considered 'safer' to lock the front brakes than the back (because locking the back tends to make a car swap ends), and (3) anti-lock brake systems work better when the bias is set even higher toward the front than non-anti-lock. (Remember the videos showing cars going straight ahead while trying to perform panic stops in the water).
Maximum stopping power comes just after the tires starts to slip a small amount. Not fully locked, but no longer rolling at the vehicle’s full speed either. It's tuff to achieve this in a street car, and even some race cars. Generally anti-lock aids in handling during emergency braking situations, but at a real and measurable small loss in absolute stopping distance. For the 7 and most other street cars this means the front brakes lock well before mazimum braking is achieved by the back tires.
#6
Hi Powr FD's
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: OKC
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
David, thanks for the insight.
I was watching HorsePower TV on TNN and they were saying the same thing basically. That because the weight is pushed forward, more demand is on the Front brakes. I think my emergency brakes been rubbing, cuz Im always having to bring it down.
I was watching HorsePower TV on TNN and they were saying the same thing basically. That because the weight is pushed forward, more demand is on the Front brakes. I think my emergency brakes been rubbing, cuz Im always having to bring it down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
08-18-15 05:30 PM