Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

New Yokohama ES100's just mounted

Old Oct 1, 2003 | 08:34 AM
  #26  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
I want to make a correction. The weights I listed above were apparently not for tires of the same size. I spoke to a rep at tire rack and was given the following weights for the above mentioned tires in 16 245/45

RE750=25lbs
AVS sport=25.5
ES100s=27lbs

This reinforces my choice.-RE750s
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #27  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
As you guys are finding out the treadwear rating doesn't have diddly to do with real performance grip, and every car uses the tire slightly differently anyway. And some tires get horrible as the tread wears and others get better. I go by others' opinions who have run the tires, but it's always a guessing game. Don't put much faith in numbers.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #28  
redrotorR1's Avatar
LS6 Convert
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally posted by CCarlisi
RE750=25lbs
AVS sport=25.5
ES100s=27lbs

This reinforces my choice.-RE750s
Just FYI ...

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...ighlight=RE750

RE750s are very good tires. I've got about 2000 miles on them and they still look almost brand new. Treadwear appears to be a lot better ... the rating appears to have a kernel of truth to it.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 12:04 PM
  #29  
TRUENOCOUPE's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: SAN JOSE, CA.
I have been using ES100 for Drifting and Gripping. SO far I loved the tires for Drifting.

Its not too grippy for drift as for grip I wouldn't even buy these tires.

From Azenis and ES100. Ill stick to Azenis and it has a stiffer sidewallls than the ES.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2003 | 02:06 PM
  #30  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
I now have about 6 weeks and 550 miles on the tires. They should be scrubbed in by now.

For performance driving, I am a little disappointed. They seem to want to roll over and "push" more than the 730's did. Overall grip seems to be slightly less than I anticipated. I wish I had spent the extra money and bought the 750's.

If anyone wants to buy them, I will consider selling them at a loss. I paid about $425 (shipped)

PM me if interested.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2003 | 10:18 PM
  #31  
Snrub's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Notice what the performance difference (look at the times and Gs) is between the RE750s and the ES100. Yes the RE750s are better, but are they 30-40% better?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #32  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
I talked to the people at the Tire Rack this morning. They said that Yokohama will take them back as long as they have no more than 2/32" wear. I am sending them back. Ordered the Bridgestones this morning .

That's great service from the Tire Rack!!!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #33  
adam c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally posted by Snrub
Yes the RE750s are better, but are they 30-40% better?
The 750's are not 30-40% better. Everyone has a minimal acceptable level for tire performance. You could buy a $50 tire that would perform at 80% of the yokohama, but not many would be happy with it. I wanted a tire that would perform as well as the Bridgestone 730's that I had, at a much lower noise level. The Yokohama didn't provide what I wanted. I'm not saying that it is a bad tire. I am saying that it didn't meet MY requirements.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2003 | 09:58 PM
  #34  
badass7's Avatar
Pimpin Rotors...and Hoes
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, LA
Originally posted by adam c
The 750's are not 30-40% better. Everyone has a minimal acceptable level for tire performance. You could buy a $50 tire that would perform at 80% of the yokohama, but not many would be happy with it. I wanted a tire that would perform as well as the Bridgestone 730's that I had, at a much lower noise level. The Yokohama didn't provide what I wanted. I'm not saying that it is a bad tire. I am saying that it didn't meet MY requirements.
Glad to read this thread bec. I had my eyes on these tires as well. Will opt to go with something else now.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
freq
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Sep 7, 2015 04:35 PM
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
0
Sep 4, 2015 05:20 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
0
Sep 4, 2015 05:19 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.