Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Help fc wheel offset limits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2004 | 10:35 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Erie,pa 16503
Help fc wheel offset limits

17" x 7 wheels for an 1990 gxl What is the offset limits for this size rim with stock skinny *** tires with no problems ???? . 38 to 045 ? is there a chart quide or simple websight out there for the 2nd generation fitmen ... thanks .. looking at 17" x7" 5mm ADR Akunin wheels with a : 45 ! offset ...
thanks in advance
Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 01:53 AM
  #2  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
stockers are 7" and +40.

Click the links that are stickied in this section. There is an offset chart in one of them.
Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 07:41 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Erie,pa 16503
thanks for the info , although i couldn't find the chart , if 40 is norm would the 45 offset + 5 move the wheel in or out from the fenders ? also dosn't sound like much of a move , especialy with 7" rims ??
Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #4  
neevosh's Avatar
The Dude Abides
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
The wheels will be 5mm deeper. They'll look too sunken it the wheel wells for me, but that's just personal preferance.
Reply
Old May 31, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #5  
$150FC's Avatar
Currently Winning
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL


That is the chart I was referring to.

Yes, +45 versus +40 would not be much of a change, only 5mm, as mentioned before. However, I have not ever actually measured the space between the wheel and the suspension and fender before, so I'm not sure how much 5mm would matter.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #6  
Nick_X's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Thunder Bay
im having a really hard time making sense of that chart.. what are those figures suppose to be saying???
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2004 | 11:11 PM
  #7  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 23
From: n
+45 is too much.
You might get away with like a 205 wide tire, but I don't think you can go wider (tire) than that.
Find a +35 width for a 7" wide wheel, and you get lots of choices for tire sizes.


+5 the wheel goes inside the well.
+5 is almost 1/4", and to me THAT'S a significantly amount of space, since the stock 7" +40 is already too damn tight.


-Ted
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #8  
Carl Byck's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 2
From: Big Island Hawaii
It is pretty simple, with a 16" wheel roughly 24.5-25" in diameter you max out at 6" backspacing the rear, and 5.6" in the front. To determine backspacing, you take the difference between the actual centerline of the wheel, and the mounting surface. If the mounting surface is towards the outside of the car, and the centerline of the wheel that is a positive offset, if the mounting surface is towards the inside of the centerline that is a negative offset. I run 16x12 0 offset rears, and 16x11 -12.5 offset fronts on my widebody. These numbers are based on a 2.5" spring. You can get more room up front a couple of different ways, but in the rear the trailing arm is the limiting feature.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
MILOS7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Aug 19, 2015 07:25 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.