5zigen FN01-RCs on an FD?
04-04-07, 09:50 AM
#51
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looks perfect for stretched tires like 235 front and 255 rear at most.
but with a nice and fat 255 front and 275 rear they will be hitting the fenders for sure.
nice wheels
but with a nice and fat 255 front and 275 rear they will be hitting the fenders for sure.
nice wheels
04-07-07, 04:49 AM
#56
Got Rotors?
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nathan Kwok
Looks awesome! Now you have to get a new camera and take some good pics 
. Do you think you can fit 255/40 front and 275/40 rear with a fender roll?
. Do you think you can fit 255/40 front and 275/40 rear with a fender roll?
04-07-07, 08:52 AM
#57
04-08-07, 03:40 PM
#58
I was wondering why you did not get the 17x9 with the 43 offset? That would give you a little bit more fender clearance.
If you were to put 275s in the rear do you think it would rub. My car sits a little bit lower in the rear than your car. From your pics it looks like the frim is pretty much flush up against the rear quarter panel. I am debating if i should go 17x9 all around or run 17x10 in the rear. I just dont want the rears to rub.
If you were to put 275s in the rear do you think it would rub. My car sits a little bit lower in the rear than your car. From your pics it looks like the frim is pretty much flush up against the rear quarter panel. I am debating if i should go 17x9 all around or run 17x10 in the rear. I just dont want the rears to rub.
04-08-07, 05:09 PM
#59
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by rx7will
I was wondering why you did not get the 17x9 with the 43 offset? That would give you a little bit more fender clearance.
Originally Posted by rx7will
If you were to put 275s in the rear do you think it would rub. .
04-08-07, 10:04 PM
#60
Originally Posted by rx7will
I was wondering why you did not get the 17x9 with the 43 offset? That would give you a little bit more fender clearance.
If you were to put 275s in the rear do you think it would rub. My car sits a little bit lower in the rear than your car. From your pics it looks like the frim is pretty much flush up against the rear quarter panel. I am debating if i should go 17x9 all around or run 17x10 in the rear. I just dont want the rears to rub.
If you were to put 275s in the rear do you think it would rub. My car sits a little bit lower in the rear than your car. From your pics it looks like the frim is pretty much flush up against the rear quarter panel. I am debating if i should go 17x9 all around or run 17x10 in the rear. I just dont want the rears to rub.
I wanted to do the lowest offset possible with the tire sizes I was going to run so I could get the rim as close to the fender as possible. I have plenty of room in the front, and could run a 255 no problem. 275s in the rear might be pushing it, but I could do a 265. It's a 255 in the rear and it doesn't rub at all and I didn't roll the fender. The suspension doesn't normally compress enough in the rear to even tuck the rim, but on driveways, it clears the fender.
04-08-07, 10:56 PM
#64
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone know if the 18x9.5 +45 is still available. I'd love to see this setup on all fours. I've been trying to pick wheels for a LONG time now and these keep catching my eye. What size tire would be good for this setup?
04-25-07, 09:50 AM
#74
Originally Posted by driFDer
https://www.rx7club.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=2863839
Anyone know size and offset of these wheels?
Anyone know size and offset of these wheels?
05-02-07, 10:14 PM
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: las vegas
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by owen is fat
all of the 17x10 and all of the 18x9.5 fno1rc are concave spoke, the offset plays no role in this spoke design for this wheel.
a +45 and a +12 have the same face but the +12 has more material on the inside hub area to move the hub surface inward to achieve a +12, the more centered offset.
a +45 and a +12 have the same face but the +12 has more material on the inside hub area to move the hub surface inward to achieve a +12, the more centered offset.
you are very wrrong on that fact, on these particular wheels they do not use the thickness of the hub to determine offset the use the spoke itself that is why you end up with the concave face like that, its just the same as having two two piece wheels with different offsets , lower offset creates more lip