Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

285/35/18

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-04, 08:24 AM
  #1  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 285/35/18

is 285 on a 10" w rim to wide for an fd's stock rear fender?
does it look ok or does it stick out? i know
275's are fine but never really seen anything
wider than that with stock fenders.
THANKS
Old 02-18-04, 08:36 AM
  #2  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I had a friend with 285's and they just fit...but on a 10" wheel its fine
Old 02-18-04, 09:03 AM
  #3  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did it look funny?
Old 02-18-04, 09:14 AM
  #4  
I am becoming...

iTrader: (1)
 
Broken09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'll have some rubbing issues. I was told you either need to run 285/30/18's or 265/35/18. Max Cooper I believe is running 285's search for his name and you should find out some more info.
Old 02-18-04, 10:34 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
With the right offset you shouldn't rub in the rear w/ a 10" wheel or a 285/35, though folks commonly use 275/35 or 285/30.
Old 02-18-04, 11:18 AM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pete, I want so badly to try 10.5 wides with 295/30-18s in back
Originally posted by ptrhahn
With the right offset you shouldn't rub in the rear w/ a 10" wheel or a 285/35, though folks commonly use 275/35 or 285/30.
Old 02-18-04, 11:54 AM
  #7  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you're going 2 need some flares for those.
Old 02-18-04, 12:36 PM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Really? Even with 1.5 to 2 degrees negative camber?
Originally posted by internal comsucktion engi
you're going 2 need some flares for those.
Old 02-18-04, 12:45 PM
  #9  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by internal comsucktion engi
you're going 2 need some flares for those.
It's funny how you post a thread asking if 275 or 285s will fit in the rear (they will, it's a proven fitment) and then tell Manny that 295/30s require flares......it seems if you knew one answer, you would know the other.

FWIW, Kevin Wyum ran 315s on the rear with the stock bodywork. He had to modify the trailing arms to fit the width inboard.
Old 02-18-04, 01:07 PM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
Manny,
I'm positive its doable with the right offset... problem will be finding wheels in that offset with out buying 18" Fikses or Forgelines.

With my 17x10" +44s, theres at least 3/8" room inboard even with the stock trailing arms.

I never saw any more from Herblenny about the 10.5" SSR comps...
Old 02-18-04, 02:49 PM
  #11  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Check out Phil's site. It's got nice pics of his SSR Comps in 10.5 wide with 275/35-18s in back

http://jmcustoms.com/html/features/mazda/RX7-93.html

The rear Comps came from a TX vendor who used 79.5 to 67.1 mm centering rings. The rear 10.5 wides are 43 mm offset as I recall from Phil's descriptions?

I'm thinking how nice 9.5 x 17, 42-mm offset front, and 10.5 x 18, 43-mm offset SSR Comps would be with 255/40-17 and 295/30-18 P-Zero tires fr/rr

Originally posted by ptrhahn
Manny,
I'm positive its doable with the right offset... problem will be finding wheels in that offset with out buying 18" Fikses or Forgelines.

With my 17x10" +44s, theres at least 3/8" room inboard even with the stock trailing arms.

I never saw any more from Herblenny about the 10.5" SSR comps...
Old 02-18-04, 03:25 PM
  #12  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
I would think it'll look strange if your sidewalls are smaller in the rear than front. Functionally, it should be fine.

I was thinking of doing the same with 255/40/17 front, 275/35/18 rear.

Yes, I know that the rear is much taller, but the reality is, i've already lowered the rear much more than the front (the wheel wells and fender heights are very different in size), so worst case scenario is that i return the car to the factory proportions in terms of rake front to rear.
Old 02-18-04, 03:33 PM
  #13  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yeah, someone's done this before, and you're right, the tire sidewall has to stay the same relative height as a ratio to the wheel diameter.
Old 02-18-04, 03:38 PM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
Manny,
How many peoples perfectly innocent threads do you suppose you an I have hijacked to yack about fantasy wheel and tire setups:?

We have to be the worst window shoppers on the forum. :-)

Sorry internalconsucktionengine!!
Old 02-18-04, 03:57 PM
  #15  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
LMFAO
Originally posted by ptrhahn
Manny,
How many peoples perfectly innocent threads do you suppose you an I have hijacked to yack about fantasy wheel and tire setups:?

We have to be the worst window shoppers on the forum. :-)

Sorry internalconsucktionengine!!
Old 02-18-04, 04:09 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
xchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SleepR1
Yeah, someone's done this before, and you're right, the tire sidewall has to stay the same relative height as a ratio to the wheel diameter.
This is the main reason I went with the 275/35s on the rear. I actually wanted the slight gearing change with the taller tire. How wide would a 10.5" wheel support? Can you go with 300+/30s back there on a wheel like that. Or would a +50 and 10.5x18 with a 300+ width tire just be too wide?

The 275s of the ES300 I got are very wide for this width. I'll be posting pics tonight in another thread and can show the 295 next to it (now unmounted).
Old 02-18-04, 04:13 PM
  #17  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
You won't find a 300-section tire. The generally go from 295 to 305 or 315.

For a 10.5" wheel, i'd max it at 295/30/18. I'd want an 11" for anthing bigger.
Old 02-18-04, 05:52 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
xchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I meant 300+, not exactly 300. I was thinking 305 or so to get the sidewalls close to the same in a stagger setup.
Old 02-19-04, 11:55 AM
  #19  
Lives on the Forum

 
SleepR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by ptrhahn
For a 10.5" wheel, i'd max it at 295/30/18. I'd want an 11" for anthing bigger.
Old 02-21-04, 05:33 AM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
bkapold@aol.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minnesota/ California
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure if you guys remember Kevin Tan but he had the 285 on the back as I posted previously. There were tight, but the CCW's obviously had the correct spacing...

Of course then theres Kevin Wyum who has 17 x 11 w/ 315 tire and up front he has 17 x 10 w/ 275 ( I think thats the wheel width up front) . Now thats impressive up close. He all shared Wyum's garage one Winter back in 97 so I got a good look at both of there wide wheel setups....I too got the wide wheel fever and run 17 x 9.5 w/ 275, but thats on a 91 Turbo ....
Old 02-21-04, 12:39 PM
  #21  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
It would be cool if Kevin Wyum (since he's back now) would share some details and pics on his 17x11" rear setup. There seems to be more interest in this extreme size than there used to be what with cars making 500 rwhpo and all. As I remember, he had to keep his car kind of jacked up to make it work. I know another person w/ 17x11" CCWs, but they are mounted w/ 275/40 hoosiers.

It might be easier to run an 18x11 now, what with all the 18" tire sizes that are available now.
Old 02-21-04, 02:43 PM
  #22  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Here's a pic of the 17x11 with 315s that Kevin ran. The trailing arm is spaced over to make it fit....that's a wide tire!

Old 02-21-04, 04:43 PM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
bkapold@aol.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minnesota/ California
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kevin did end up running a 5mm spacer w/ longer studs if I remember right. He also had to, lets just say fix the outer fender lip to allow the tires not to rub... They do fit though... He also used the M2 trailing arms, of course. But, ya alot of tire on his car...

Kevin? ya out there?

Brad
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yumidraco
Build Threads
3
07-01-14 08:19 PM



Quick Reply: 285/35/18



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.