Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

17 x 10 - what size tire would you get?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-05, 07:43 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
DGblk93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In your wheelhouse
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17 x 10 - what size tire would you get?

I have 17 x 10 rears and I am currently running 275 / 40's. I have seen some other members with 265's on the same rims. I need to buy some new tires.

Why would I choose one over the other (265 vs. 275)? I just drive the car for fun - no racing.

Any input is appreciated. Thanks
Old 11-02-05, 02:56 AM
  #2  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (22)
 
ARD T2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,775
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
It comes down to gearing and your speedo. Ideally you want to retain the stock tire diameter of a 225/50/16. The 255/40 or 265/40/17 stay closer to that whereas the 275/40/17 is definitely taller. For your purposes whatever looks better to you. Going to wide in the rear may also adversely affect the naturally neutral balance of the FD.

Rishie
Old 11-02-05, 07:41 AM
  #3  
Send me your BMX parts

 
raising arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Quartz Hill CA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Rishie's correct. By comparision a 225-45 17 is 25" and a 275-40 17 is 25.6" tall. All tyres are not the same, but you get the idea
Old 11-02-05, 07:54 AM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Get the 275/40/17. The whole "gearing" issue is massively overblown.

I don't know what size your front wheel/tire is, and if its really narrow, 225/235, you MIGHT want to get a 265/40/17 rear instead based on personal preference, but i've run virtually ever 17 and 18" combo there is, and honestly, unless you're running on the track AND that track has the sort of corners that beg for an extra-large front tire, a "staggered" set up is just fine. There's no point in running some massive 275 or 285 section tire up front on the street just because you rear tire is that size.

If you've got a 9" front wheel (or even 8.5" in a stretch, i'd try a 255/40/17 with your 275/40/17 rear, or try a 245/40/17 front with a 265/40/17 rear... or some slight variation thereof
Old 11-02-05, 09:59 AM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
unless you're running on the track AND that track has the sort of corners that beg for an extra-large front tire
The corners don't always beg for large front tires, but the braking zones at the ends of the straightaways sure can...
Old 11-02-05, 10:29 AM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Of course.

The point I always try to make though, is that there's no need to limit the rear tire size in order to match the front in the name of "ballance"... So just because you only have a 9" rim 255 front tire doesn't mean you have to run a 255 rear on your 10" rim or your car will be an ill-handling pig. For the street, a little-less-than-275 mm tire up front is a little nicer and less likely to rub, so if that's your only set...

... and no need to limit yourself to a 255 tire on 17" wheels so that your gearing won't be "off" (of what?).



Originally Posted by DamonB
The corners don't always beg for large front tires, but the braking zones at the ends of the straightaways sure can...
Old 11-02-05, 02:11 PM
  #7  
my car is always broke **P

 
SkylarNeedsParts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: your moms house aka WA
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
..so that your gearing won't be "off" (of what?).
when "your gearing is off" your speedo is inaccurate. if you have taller tires your speedo says you are going faster if you have shorter ones it says you are going slower. get 275/35's in the rear and 245/40s(or 45s) up front. those are the correct ratios to be the same as stock height although the rear 275/35 is the important one to keep your speedo accurate.
Old 11-02-05, 02:29 PM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Dude, it's a couple MPH at most... and within the range of error in many factory speedos.

Nobody MAKES a 275/35/17 anymore, and there's no need in sacrificing performance with skinny 17" tires to satisfy an obsession (that's all it is) over a minute difference in gearing or speedo accuracy... Hundreds of FD owners have run 275/40/17's, and I personally have run 225/50/16, 245/45/16, 245/40/17, 255/40/17, 275/40/17, 275/35/18, and 285/30/18 on the rear of my cars alone. You're talking about a range of maybe 5 mph tops from the tallest to the shortest, and no discernable difference in gearinng.


Originally Posted by SkylarNeedsParts
when "your gearing is off" your speedo is inaccurate. if you have taller tires your speedo says you are going faster if you have shorter ones it says you are going slower. get 275/35's in the rear and 245/40s(or 45s) up front. those are the correct ratios to be the same as stock height although the rear 275/35 is the important one to keep your speedo accurate.
Old 11-02-05, 05:49 PM
  #9  
my car is always broke **P

 
SkylarNeedsParts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: your moms house aka WA
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
youre right about the 275/35-17...i was thinking about the 18s my bad..
Old 11-02-05, 08:35 PM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

 
owen is fat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I run a 275/40 on my fronts and a 285/40 on the rears, both 17x10. there is barely half inch difference in contact patch although unmoiunted bare tires look much different between the two sizes. when either are compared to a 265, the difference is minimal and I would think a 265 is the low limit for the rim width, you still may see some nice performance out of a 265 "stretched" over a 10" wide wheel.
it really depends on what specific tire brand and model you want to drive on. I love the kumho MX and it has been great for a daily driver and autox tire... but there are plenty more nice tires out there to run on an rx7.
Old 11-03-05, 08:23 AM
  #11  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by SkylarNeedsParts
if you have taller tires your speedo says you are going faster if you have shorter ones it says you are going slower.
Actually that's backwards. The speedometer only knows how fast the axles are turning and a shorter tire covers less ground with each axle revolution. Therefore the speedometer will read faster than actual speed with a too short tire.
Old 11-04-05, 03:49 AM
  #12  
WWFSMD

 
maxcooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
One reason is that some tires are only available in one of those sizes. That's why I had 265/40 S-03s. I would have purchased 275/40 if they were available in that size.

If you are worried about putting the power down or drag-style launches, the larger diameters have two advantages: larger dia gives longer contact patch, and taller sidewalls generally help straight-line traction.

-Max
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
08-09-18 05:54 PM
rx7jocke
Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes
72
06-17-16 03:48 AM



Quick Reply: 17 x 10 - what size tire would you get?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.