Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

zero timing split and dual flame fronts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 02:04 PM
  #51  
RX794's Avatar
NYC's Loudest FD
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Originally posted by Flyrx7
So, if the timing split is reduced on the Trailing, then isn't this effectively just advancing the timing? (Trailing firing before leading at a given rotor position/combustion chamber)I could see this adding more HP but at the risk of detenation (of course I'm sure you guys take this into account while tuning). Could you not get the same or similar results by leaving the stock split but advancing the overall timing? Interesting.

Frank
What we're discussing here is NO timing split BETWEEN the leading and trailing plugs, NOT overall ignition timing like what you are reffering to. The leading and trailing plugs are seperated 10 degrees away from each other in the engine. What we're discussing is firing them TOGETHER, instead of firing them seperately from each other. I hope this made sense.

Last edited by RX794; Oct 14, 2002 at 02:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 02:10 PM
  #52  
Flyrx7's Avatar
Money Pit
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 5
From: Wa. state
Originally posted by RX794


What we're discussing here is NO timing split between the leading and trailing plugs, NOT overall ignition timing like what you are reffering to. The leading and trailing plugs are seperated 10 degrees away from each other in the engine. What we're discussing is firing them TOGETHER, instead of firing them seperately from each other. I hope I made sense.
Yeah, I figured I didn't explain myself clear enough.
If you are reducing the split to 0, the trailing fires at the same time as the leading, oh, wait, Leading is the bottom plug, isn't it? If so, NEVERMIND!

Frank
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 02:46 PM
  #53  
rotorbrain's Avatar
fart on a friends head!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 2
From: sheppard AFB, TX
yes frank, leading IS the bottom plug.

paul
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #54  
mr_vaughn's Avatar
Chillin
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 5
From: LA,CA
bump
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 02:49 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Minden, NV
Good thread, didn't the 4rotor lemans car have 3 plugs for each rotor? If so, where was it located?

-edit-I just found this pic.
Attached Thumbnails zero timing split and dual flame fronts-3plugs.jpg  

Last edited by EpitrochoidMan; Sep 25, 2004 at 03:06 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 10:24 AM
  #56  
capt. bill1's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota FL/Ft Lauderdale
OK, here's what I'm looking at. In my "criuse" areas on my PFC map ther is no split. As I drive in those areas the engine seems to run a bit rough or not smooth.
Not real bad but I can feel it and hear it.

Would adding some split smooth things out?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #57  
capt. bill1's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota FL/Ft Lauderdale
Anybody?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #58  
jpandes's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Someone please clear something up for me:

When reducing split for an existing timing map, do you leave the leading timing alone and reduce the number for trailing? Or is their more to it?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #59  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
Originally Posted by capt. bill1
OK, here's what I'm looking at. In my "criuse" areas on my PFC map ther is no split. As I drive in those areas the engine seems to run a bit rough or not smooth.
Not real bad but I can feel it and hear it.

Would adding some split smooth things out?
add some split. the pfc timing might not be precise enough to give you perfectly zero split. you could be getting some negative split if you run it that tight.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #60  
2Lucky2tha7's Avatar
Back at it again!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
From: Western Colorado
Bump for great info, and hopefully some more updated info on this subject.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #61  
fastrotaries's Avatar
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Does anyone know how they split the plugs on the 4 rotor? two leading and one trailing it seems, but at what interval timing wise? and that traliing is really way up there. Or did they fire all three at the same time...If so, was this a high RPM operation only or throughout the entire power band?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 12:47 AM
  #62  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
I'm not sure the 4 rotor engine *had* a "Low RPM" operation range... All it had to do was idle, and from the videos I've seen, it didn't do that terribly well, but it would stay running.

They weren't exactly running around the track at 3000 RPM...

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #63  
fastrotaries's Avatar
W. TX chirpin Monkey
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
I knew that much. but there's a difference between coming out of a slow corner at 4K RPMS and the back straight at 10K RPMS.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 04:17 AM
  #64  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by fastrotaries
Does anyone know how they split the plugs on the 4 rotor? two leading and one trailing it seems, but at what interval timing wise? and that traliing is really way up there. Or did they fire all three at the same time...If so, was this a high RPM operation only or throughout the entire power band?


they dont run a timing split.

so theres really no "leading" or "trailing" per se.

and yes, running straight with no split kills lowend power, but who cares if its a track-car..
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 06:10 AM
  #65  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by fastrotaries
Does anyone know how they split the plugs on the 4 rotor? two leading and one trailing it seems, but at what interval timing wise? and that traliing is really way up there. Or did they fire all three at the same time...If so, was this a high RPM operation only or throughout the entire power band?
Actually, they are called "Leading", "Trailing", and "Far Trailing".
There is an SAE paper that covers the R26B motor.
The literature implies there was a split between L and T; I don't remember if this was explicitly stated.
The paper does explicitly state that T and FT fired at the same time.


-Ted
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 07:00 AM
  #66  
BOOSTED Vert
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
From: Miami
ok so back on this old topic. One question, what/how does no or little timing split affect your motor? I even heard of someone using neg. split in vacuum areas to help with spool up and such. Something that cant be done on microtech/haltech.

Whats recommended for cruise and idle? 20-15* split? microtech current max. is 20-0.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JIMMY54
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Aug 12, 2015 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.