Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-13, 06:06 PM
  #1  
Instrument Of G0D.


Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,544
Received 994 Likes on 746 Posts
Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)

Ok, a little question for those with more experience than me;

so I got some 1 1/2" tube the other day, to use from the wastegates to the down pipe, but it turns out to be a smaller size than the 1/2" steamipe used on the manifold, which is the size I was thinking of when I got it.

Its fits inside the flange perfectly, (see pic) i'll just need to die grind the step down, but the flange is also machined for 1 3/4" pipe (see pic)

The gates are turbosmart 40mm

So 1 1/2 or 1 3/4? Im going for maximum wastegate effectiveness. I want to be able to run LOW boost around town.

would the higher velocity of the smaller pipes help the gasses to merge into the down pipe? Or would it be a restriction compared to 40mm I/d all the way in?

Im planning to merge them together with a collector and then into the down pipe on a shallow angle.

Anyway, heres some happy snaps:
Attached Thumbnails Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)-005.jpg   Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)-006.jpg   Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)-008.jpg   Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)-001.jpg   Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)-003.jpg  

Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)-002.jpg  
Old 11-13-13, 07:11 PM
  #2  
Instrument Of G0D.


Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,544
Received 994 Likes on 746 Posts
So 35mm I/d with a step down, or 41-odd-mm I/d with a step up?

Or makes no difference?

all opinions welcome

thankyou.
Old 11-13-13, 07:12 PM
  #3  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You'll have a area that is bigger than a 50mm gate with those tubes but basically a good bit smaller than a 60mm gate. Not sure what the goals are but you should be fine. The overall difference in area will be slightly less than 10% for the tubing you are running, keep in mind 10% less area doesn't necessarily equal 10% less flow.

~S~
Old 11-13-13, 07:17 PM
  #4  
Instrument Of G0D.


Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,544
Received 994 Likes on 746 Posts
So which would you go with?

The goals are to make these twin 40mm gates flow as much as possible when they are full open and plumbed into the down pipe.
Old 11-14-13, 09:41 AM
  #5  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No smaller than the id of the discharge flange.

~S~
Old 11-15-13, 03:54 PM
  #6  
Instrument Of G0D.


Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,544
Received 994 Likes on 746 Posts
Thanks zero, that's just good common sense, and pretty much what I knew all along. I guess ill just get the proper size pipe.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
07-17-19 02:20 PM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
5
08-09-18 05:54 PM



Quick Reply: Wastegate runner size (plumb-back)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.