Turbo 12a Peripheral Port
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C. ,Canada
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo 12a Peripheral Port
Well i have a set of MFR 12a peripheral port housings that are awaiting a project of mine down the road, but mean while my dad has asked if he can use them to build an engine for his Drag car. So what he is wondering is, running between 15-17 psi (he wants to stay on pump gas) how much power could he make? He will be running a draw through system with a predator carb. He is also wondering if the 6,000 Stall converter he has will be enough for the car not to bog of the launch.
#2
multipersonality disorder
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15-17 psi in a pp isn't even the same ballpark as 15-17psi on a streetport or somethng like that. tho motor's powerband is going to be much higher and he won't be able to run as much boost.
there's no real way to answer "is this safe". he's going to have to spend some time on the dyno and watch things very carefully and find the limitations of pump gas with that setup.
turbo size will play a HUGE factor in it as well.
there's no real way to answer "is this safe". he's going to have to spend some time on the dyno and watch things very carefully and find the limitations of pump gas with that setup.
turbo size will play a HUGE factor in it as well.
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C. ,Canada
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can understand that as the PP will flow alot more air, is there anyone running a fairly low boost PP, all the ones i have seen are running 25-30+ psi
#4
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Not a 12A but a 13BPP turbo http://ausrotary.dntinternet.com/for...=77936&start=0 Car made "420HP at the tyres, slipping clutch and at only 7300rpm and 9psi boost!" This was done on pump gas.
#5
PP Turbo's are alot of fun. Yes they scare most people but that's because not many people have done them and the ones that have aren't to keen about sharing the info they have.
As for running low boost on pump gas i don't see any problems with it. The one thing i would stress though would be proper wastegate placement and size. PP's will boost like crazy and trying to get them to run low boost will need a good manifold!
We have a car that will make over 35psi just free revving and on a 2 step will easily exceed 50psi within the second bang.
As for running low boost on pump gas i don't see any problems with it. The one thing i would stress though would be proper wastegate placement and size. PP's will boost like crazy and trying to get them to run low boost will need a good manifold!
We have a car that will make over 35psi just free revving and on a 2 step will easily exceed 50psi within the second bang.
#6
multipersonality disorder
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 13btnos
Not a 12A but a 13BPP turbo http://ausrotary.dntinternet.com/for...=77936&start=0 Car made "420HP at the tyres, slipping clutch and at only 7300rpm and 9psi boost!" This was done on pump gas.
420 is a waste of a pp. but since that's an aussie website, maybe that number was KW.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
#7
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
420 is a waste of a pp. but since that's an aussie website, maybe that number was KW.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
You obviously dont' have a clue about pp turbo motors...
It was probably dynoed on a dyno dynamics which is about 13~15% lower then dynojet.
Trending Topics
#8
The 12a will require LOTS of work to make any sort of numbers, say, above 300. You will need dowell pinning, race oil pump, turbo2 water pump, 110 psi oil pressure regulator, and some other good stuff (not that 13b's dont need some of these, but 12a's require lots more work). Also, you WILL be able to produce 17psi of boost on a PP, just that a PP will show more accurately the boost actually going inside the engine, as opposed to a street port, which is manifold boost (the port acts like a pressure nozzle).
#9
multipersonality disorder
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by enzo250
How is that a waste? What the hell are you talking about?
You obviously dont' have a clue about pp turbo motors...
It was probably dynoed on a dyno dynamics which is about 13~15% lower then dynojet.
You obviously dont' have a clue about pp turbo motors...
It was probably dynoed on a dyno dynamics which is about 13~15% lower then dynojet.
what i'm saying is you can get that kind of hp in a boosted application on stock ports. the peripheral is going to move the powerband up. the slower you can spin it for any particular hp level (generally speaking) the longet it will last.
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
420 is a waste of a pp. but since that's an aussie website, maybe that number was KW.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
#14
BOOSTED Vert
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
420 is a waste of a pp. but since that's an aussie website, maybe that number was KW.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
420kw= 563hp
that sounds a bit more like it.
#15
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by enzo250
What point?
Tell me what power wouldn't be a waste with 9lbs of boost.
Tell me what power wouldn't be a waste with 9lbs of boost.
Last edited by 13btnos; 12-12-05 at 06:21 PM.
#16
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C. ,Canada
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well he is still intrested in dueing it and after he saw that 420 rwhp at such a low rpm at 9 psi, he is really excited now. The gas he would be using he told me is a mix of pump 93 and some sort of race gas with a 116 octane level. So you guys are talking about intakes being extremely important, would we want to go with a sort intake or a longer intake, keep in mind that this is a draw through turbo set up.
#17
multipersonality disorder
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 13btnos
I believe his point was that you can make 420rwhp with a stock port motor, which can be done, but with alot more boost than 9psi. What he fails to see is that this was done with only 9psi boost a stock port at 9psi will not even come close to this number. No way in hell! Another thing is he doesn't realize that this was a first time tune and was done on pump gas they are going to run C16 and turn the boost up on this motor. I am closely watching this thread on AusRotary it's very exciting to see people are successful with a PPort turbo setup. Also enzo250 if you were to consider a low boost say 20psi max on a PPort turbo what kind of wastegate setup would be ideal? A single large or 2 individuals per runner? I love the manifolds that you have built they are top shelf.
na, i didn't fail to see any point. a pp is just overkill for 400hp.
assuming 2 engines made the same hp, i'd rather see 400whp @ 6500 rpm @15 psi than 400whp @ 8500 rpm @ 9psi.
#18
BOOSTED Vert
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
na, i didn't fail to see any point. a pp is just overkill for 400hp.
assuming 2 engines made the same hp, i'd rather see 400whp @ 6500 rpm @15 psi than 400whp @ 8500 rpm @ 9psi.
assuming 2 engines made the same hp, i'd rather see 400whp @ 6500 rpm @15 psi than 400whp @ 8500 rpm @ 9psi.
#19
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C. ,Canada
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well eventually it will happen that he will run more boost, but hey its better to use the housings then have them sitting around doing nothing
#20
Originally Posted by 13btnos
Also enzo250 if you were to consider a low boost say 20psi max on a PPort turbo what kind of wastegate setup would be ideal? A single large or 2 individuals per runner? I love the manifolds that you have built they are top shelf.
#21
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
na, i didn't fail to see any point. a pp is just overkill for 400hp.
assuming 2 engines made the same hp, i'd rather see 400whp @ 6500 rpm @15 psi than 400whp @ 8500 rpm @ 9psi.
assuming 2 engines made the same hp, i'd rather see 400whp @ 6500 rpm @15 psi than 400whp @ 8500 rpm @ 9psi.
#22
multipersonality disorder
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you totally missed the point.
he said pump gas. where i live that's 91 octane. it might be higher where he is, but that's where i am. you'd max out the gas before you maxed out the port.
he said pump gas. where i live that's 91 octane. it might be higher where he is, but that's where i am. you'd max out the gas before you maxed out the port.
#23
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
you totally missed the point.
he said pump gas. where i live that's 91 octane. it might be higher where he is, but that's where i am. you'd max out the gas before you maxed out the port.
he said pump gas. where i live that's 91 octane. it might be higher where he is, but that's where i am. you'd max out the gas before you maxed out the port.