stock ports dyno vs dyno
01-24-08, 05:59 PM
#26
silver ghost
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
It's not all about the HP. I've seen cars making 350-390HP on twins destroy cars making 450 on a single setup. If your goal is a HP number and you never run your car at the track, then that's easy. Bolt on a large turbo and make all the HP in the world, very easy. Now if you want to run the best times at the track then you have to start looking at recovery times between shifts and a whole bunch of other things. You can make 600HP but if your setup takes 1 sec between shifts to hit full boost again, what good is it.... What is your goal with your car?
Anthony
Anthony
CJ
01-24-08, 07:16 PM
#28
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have already trapped 177-118 on stock twins. when i was running seq. but with this non seq setup, if im anything less then 4100 rpms and hit it, im sittin there waiting for **** to happen.....my turbo's are 99 spec btw. its fun to drive if im in the rpm band, but if im below 4100 i have nothing.
01-29-08, 03:17 PM
#29
I am currently installing 99 spec. I was thinking about going non-seq. while I was under the hood, but with what I am hearing I am questioning this chose. I don't run the strip, but I plan on hitting the track. Is there away to get back the lower RPM power with non-seq.? I need that quick boost coming out of the corners.
Please forgive the cluelessness. This is my first turbo, I've always drive N/A
Please forgive the cluelessness. This is my first turbo, I've always drive N/A
02-02-08, 07:33 PM
#30
Rotary Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am currently installing 99 spec. I was thinking about going non-seq. while I was under the hood, but with what I am hearing I am questioning this chose. I don't run the strip, but I plan on hitting the track. Is there away to get back the lower RPM power with non-seq.? I need that quick boost coming out of the corners.
Please forgive the cluelessness. This is my first turbo, I've always drive N/A
Please forgive the cluelessness. This is my first turbo, I've always drive N/A
02-05-08, 11:04 PM
#31
I am currently installing 99 spec. I was thinking about going non-seq. while I was under the hood, but with what I am hearing I am questioning this chose. I don't run the strip, but I plan on hitting the track. Is there away to get back the lower RPM power with non-seq.? I need that quick boost coming out of the corners.
Please forgive the cluelessness. This is my first turbo, I've always drive N/A
Please forgive the cluelessness. This is my first turbo, I've always drive N/A
i can tell you its no fun seq. going around a turn on the track at full boost and then have the second turbo kick in only to send you into a tail spin. my .02
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
