Out of Fuel - Anyone using 1300/1600 setup on the street?
Originally posted by fdracer
then wtf is the warantee good for? does anyone know the exact terms of rob's warantee?
then wtf is the warantee good for? does anyone know the exact terms of rob's warantee?
Originally posted by Badog
Keep an eye on those INJ duty cycles (if you don't have WB and a Datalogit) in the temps below 20C. Alot of tuners DON'T know much about correction factors. Ask Dave at KDR what correction factor he didn't use.
Keep an eye on those INJ duty cycles (if you don't have WB and a Datalogit) in the temps below 20C. Alot of tuners DON'T know much about correction factors. Ask Dave at KDR what correction factor he didn't use.
Originally posted by nocab72
Does your FPR have just one allen adjustment on the top of the FPR? Mine has just one.
I assume the RRFPR (allowing to adjust the amount of fuel pressure raise > 1:1) requires a second adjustment screw.
K
Does your FPR have just one allen adjustment on the top of the FPR? Mine has just one.
I assume the RRFPR (allowing to adjust the amount of fuel pressure raise > 1:1) requires a second adjustment screw.
K
at idle i'm 99% sure its at 48psi. if you mess with the base pressure you are gonna richen or lean the ENTIRE range out..... just remember LOL
Last edited by vosko; Nov 15, 2002 at 04:08 PM.
There is some inconsistent use of the terminology by vendors (and lots of inconsistent use in general) but I would like to see everyone agree on and use this terminology:
Adjustable FPR w/manifold reference (or just AFPR): regulator with one setting for base pressure with a 1:1 boost pressure rise for consistent effective fuel pressure at any boost level. Note that the reference does not give you "more" fuel under boost, it just makes sure you get the same amount of fuel delivered for a given duty cycle under any manifold pressure. Your effective fuel pressure is your fuel pressure gauge pressure minus your boost pressure. If you set the base pressure to 50 psi (with the manifold reference disconnected), your fuel pressure will drop under vacuum and go up under boost. It will always be the same pressure relative to the manifold pressure, so you get the same flow for a given duty cycle (the effective pressure will always be 50 psi).
Rising-rate FPR (RRFPR): regulator with a fixed or adjustable base pressure, where you can adjust the ratio of fuel pressure to manifold pressure. This will give you more fuel flow under boost for a given duty cycle as long as the rate is set above 1:1. Units without an adjustable base pressure are often used in conjunction with the stock regulator, so the RRFPR doesn't take over until the pressure it wants is higher than the pressure the other regulator wants. The rise rate is adjustable on al the ones I have seen. For a stock regulator with a base pressure of 37 psi, and a RRFPR with a base pressure of 30 psi and a 2:1 rise rate, you get this fuel pressure:
-15 inHg manifold, fp gauge 30 psi, effective pressre 37 psi (stock FPR in control)
0 psi manifold, fp gauge 37 psi, effective pressure 37 psi (stock FPR in control)
5 psi manifold, fp gauge 42 psi, effective pressure 37 psi (stock FPR in control)
10 psi manifold, fp gauge 50 psi, effecive pressure 40 psi (RRFPR in control)
15 psi manifold, fp gauge 60 psi, effective pressure 45 psi (RRFPR in control)
Note that an RRFPR gives you another adjustment point that you might not need with a programmable engine management system. I would rather just set the base pressure higher with an AFPR or get bigger injectors and do tuning than have to deal with setting the RRFPR and tuning. Simpler is better, and an AFPR and programmable engine management is enough tunability to do whatever you need to do. RRFPRs can be useful under specific circumstances, but I don't think a turbo car with a programmable engine management system is the right place to use one. They are often useful for putting a turbo on an NA car or for a little extra fuel with a piggy-back system and stock injectors. Remember that the fuel pump has to suppy the needed flow at the fp gauge pressure, which can get quite high with a RRFPR.
-Max
Adjustable FPR w/manifold reference (or just AFPR): regulator with one setting for base pressure with a 1:1 boost pressure rise for consistent effective fuel pressure at any boost level. Note that the reference does not give you "more" fuel under boost, it just makes sure you get the same amount of fuel delivered for a given duty cycle under any manifold pressure. Your effective fuel pressure is your fuel pressure gauge pressure minus your boost pressure. If you set the base pressure to 50 psi (with the manifold reference disconnected), your fuel pressure will drop under vacuum and go up under boost. It will always be the same pressure relative to the manifold pressure, so you get the same flow for a given duty cycle (the effective pressure will always be 50 psi).
Rising-rate FPR (RRFPR): regulator with a fixed or adjustable base pressure, where you can adjust the ratio of fuel pressure to manifold pressure. This will give you more fuel flow under boost for a given duty cycle as long as the rate is set above 1:1. Units without an adjustable base pressure are often used in conjunction with the stock regulator, so the RRFPR doesn't take over until the pressure it wants is higher than the pressure the other regulator wants. The rise rate is adjustable on al the ones I have seen. For a stock regulator with a base pressure of 37 psi, and a RRFPR with a base pressure of 30 psi and a 2:1 rise rate, you get this fuel pressure:
-15 inHg manifold, fp gauge 30 psi, effective pressre 37 psi (stock FPR in control)
0 psi manifold, fp gauge 37 psi, effective pressure 37 psi (stock FPR in control)
5 psi manifold, fp gauge 42 psi, effective pressure 37 psi (stock FPR in control)
10 psi manifold, fp gauge 50 psi, effecive pressure 40 psi (RRFPR in control)
15 psi manifold, fp gauge 60 psi, effective pressure 45 psi (RRFPR in control)
Note that an RRFPR gives you another adjustment point that you might not need with a programmable engine management system. I would rather just set the base pressure higher with an AFPR or get bigger injectors and do tuning than have to deal with setting the RRFPR and tuning. Simpler is better, and an AFPR and programmable engine management is enough tunability to do whatever you need to do. RRFPRs can be useful under specific circumstances, but I don't think a turbo car with a programmable engine management system is the right place to use one. They are often useful for putting a turbo on an NA car or for a little extra fuel with a piggy-back system and stock injectors. Remember that the fuel pump has to suppy the needed flow at the fp gauge pressure, which can get quite high with a RRFPR.
-Max
Originally posted by maxcooper
...
Note that an RRFPR gives you another adjustment point that you might not need with a programmable engine management system. I would rather just set the base pressure higher with an AFPR or get bigger injectors and do tuning than have to deal with setting the RRFPR and tuning. Simpler is better, and an AFPR and programmable engine management is enough tunability to do whatever you need to do. RRFPRs can be useful under specific circumstances, but I don't think a turbo car with a programmable engine management system is the right place to use one. They are often useful for putting a turbo on an NA car or for a little extra fuel with a piggy-back system and stock injectors. Remember that the fuel pump has to suppy the needed flow at the fp gauge pressure, which can get quite high with a RRFPR.
-Max
...
Note that an RRFPR gives you another adjustment point that you might not need with a programmable engine management system. I would rather just set the base pressure higher with an AFPR or get bigger injectors and do tuning than have to deal with setting the RRFPR and tuning. Simpler is better, and an AFPR and programmable engine management is enough tunability to do whatever you need to do. RRFPRs can be useful under specific circumstances, but I don't think a turbo car with a programmable engine management system is the right place to use one. They are often useful for putting a turbo on an NA car or for a little extra fuel with a piggy-back system and stock injectors. Remember that the fuel pump has to suppy the needed flow at the fp gauge pressure, which can get quite high with a RRFPR.
-Max
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 1
From: Memphis, TN - wishin' i was back in Ft Worth
i think you can allrotor. carson (spyfish007), who is missing in action according to everyone, uses 850's all around. i bought some extras from poweraxl( steve) and planned on using them in that configuration or just send them to rc for the upgrade
nocab - I have 2 x 720cc primaries and 2 x 1650cc secondaries. Base fuel pressure is 45psi. I have enough fuel for 30psi and 600+ at the back wheels. You should have left the 850s as 850s and not had them modified
Originally posted by Badog
More I think about it, Nocab, the more I think the RRFPR is too much trouble. Up the base fuel pressure 5psi.
More I think about it, Nocab, the more I think the RRFPR is too much trouble. Up the base fuel pressure 5psi.
AJC13B - I'm sure I can find someone who wants 1300's and will swap out their 850's for my 1300's... oh Carl, where are you?

K
1600cc Primaries
I was going to try 1600cc primaries, but after talking to Koji at xs
I found that the 920cc I am using is the fastest injector pulswidth
the PFC can fire. With 920cc injectors my idle is minimum 1200rpms
due to injector pulswidth. I think Koji said that the PFC fastest pulse
width is 2.3ms, note: anything below 1200rpm IDLE SUCKS.
Xcesive Motorsports
I found that the 920cc I am using is the fastest injector pulswidth
the PFC can fire. With 920cc injectors my idle is minimum 1200rpms
due to injector pulswidth. I think Koji said that the PFC fastest pulse
width is 2.3ms, note: anything below 1200rpm IDLE SUCKS.
Xcesive Motorsports
Re: 1600cc Primaries
Originally posted by Xcessive
I was going to try 1600cc primaries, but after talking to Koji at xs
I found that the 920cc I am using is the fastest injector pulswidth
the PFC can fire. With 920cc injectors my idle is minimum 1200rpms
due to injector pulswidth. I think Koji said that the PFC fastest pulse
width is 2.3ms, note: anything below 1200rpm IDLE SUCKS.
Xcesive Motorsports
I was going to try 1600cc primaries, but after talking to Koji at xs
I found that the 920cc I am using is the fastest injector pulswidth
the PFC can fire. With 920cc injectors my idle is minimum 1200rpms
due to injector pulswidth. I think Koji said that the PFC fastest pulse
width is 2.3ms, note: anything below 1200rpm IDLE SUCKS.
Xcesive Motorsports
Last edited by RX794; Nov 18, 2002 at 02:02 PM.
I didnt try the 1600cc because the 920s are barely good enough.
All my injectors are low impedence that I use. When I put the 920s in
and adjust the lag diff to max lean, reducing the basemap time lower
and lower made no diff. I adjusted the software to get the fastest time
per cell (To the best of my knowledge) and no diff in AFR. I have a dyno
and horiba wideband that I use for testing. My 1600cc injectors are also
low imp. so I figured why try anyfurther. By the way my car runs and Idles awsome with the 920s.
Xcessive
All my injectors are low impedence that I use. When I put the 920s in
and adjust the lag diff to max lean, reducing the basemap time lower
and lower made no diff. I adjusted the software to get the fastest time
per cell (To the best of my knowledge) and no diff in AFR. I have a dyno
and horiba wideband that I use for testing. My 1600cc injectors are also
low imp. so I figured why try anyfurther. By the way my car runs and Idles awsome with the 920s.
Xcessive
Thanks Rob, that's what I thought, I also will be using all low imp. injectors with my setup, guess I'll be going with 1000cc primaries and 1600 secondaries, only thing is what's the max RWHP with that setup at 40psi base fuel pressure?
I forgot to answer your question. Yes I think the limit is the PFC.
The 1600cc injectors should work with a faster injector driver like
the haltech etc. Now maybe I am missing something, I am open for
input. Ralph
The 1600cc injectors should work with a faster injector driver like
the haltech etc. Now maybe I am missing something, I am open for
input. Ralph
Originally posted by Xcessive
I forgot to answer your question. Yes I think the limit is the PFC.
The 1600cc injectors should work with a faster injector driver like
the haltech etc. Now maybe I am missing something, I am open for
input. Ralph
I forgot to answer your question. Yes I think the limit is the PFC.
The 1600cc injectors should work with a faster injector driver like
the haltech etc. Now maybe I am missing something, I am open for
input. Ralph
nocab,
Are you pushing 550 rwhp? You should be if you are running at 100% duty. Make sure your a:f's are correct and if so, make sure your fuel pressure is not dropping. I think the latter is likely.
Secondly... don't even think about 160lb primaries. I tried to run 4 850's in low load which is almost exactly the same flow as 160 lb primaries. Low speed drivability is horrible because you reach the lower limits of the injectors. Around 1.5ms is the shortest time they will come on and work properly. Even at 1.5ms you will have too much fuel. You can get around it by running 10:1 at low load but who wants to do that.
Bottom line, you should think about staying below 850cc for primaries if you want to play it safe... and verify your fuel pressure isn't dropping or something else isn't wrong - you shouldn't be running out of fuel with your setup.
Wade
Are you pushing 550 rwhp? You should be if you are running at 100% duty. Make sure your a:f's are correct and if so, make sure your fuel pressure is not dropping. I think the latter is likely.
Secondly... don't even think about 160lb primaries. I tried to run 4 850's in low load which is almost exactly the same flow as 160 lb primaries. Low speed drivability is horrible because you reach the lower limits of the injectors. Around 1.5ms is the shortest time they will come on and work properly. Even at 1.5ms you will have too much fuel. You can get around it by running 10:1 at low load but who wants to do that.
Bottom line, you should think about staying below 850cc for primaries if you want to play it safe... and verify your fuel pressure isn't dropping or something else isn't wrong - you shouldn't be running out of fuel with your setup.
Wade
Wade - I'm breaking the tires loose @ 90Mph in 3rd (255x35x18 Toyo Proxies, 5k miles on them). My Blitz powermeter shows 500rwhp+. I'm SURE Im pushing the limits of my Denso pump.
I run a Wideband in my car all the time. The Inj Duty cycles are likely high due to
1) too low a base fuel pressure (currently 45psi @ idle)
2) loosing fuel pressure up top, I don't have an in car-fuel pressure gauge and Tony (Badog) won't sit in my engine bay while I do a 3rd gear pull to watch the gauge. I plan to do an in car fuel pressure gauge soon.
It looks like I'll go for 850cc primaries, I think with trimming several people have had success with them.
Thanks for the advice and sharing your experiences!
k
PS lined up with a buddies SupraTT from a roll this weekend (420rwhp @ his last dyno). I pulled on him like he was sitting still...
The quickest moving thing in his car seemed to be his jaw dropping...
I run a Wideband in my car all the time. The Inj Duty cycles are likely high due to
1) too low a base fuel pressure (currently 45psi @ idle)
2) loosing fuel pressure up top, I don't have an in car-fuel pressure gauge and Tony (Badog) won't sit in my engine bay while I do a 3rd gear pull to watch the gauge. I plan to do an in car fuel pressure gauge soon.
It looks like I'll go for 850cc primaries, I think with trimming several people have had success with them.
Thanks for the advice and sharing your experiences!
k
PS lined up with a buddies SupraTT from a roll this weekend (420rwhp @ his last dyno). I pulled on him like he was sitting still...
The quickest moving thing in his car seemed to be his jaw dropping...
Last edited by nocab72; Nov 19, 2002 at 12:10 PM.
OK guys a little update on the 1600cc primary injector subject, I spoke to some of my friends on the subject that have this setup and guess what?, their cars idle at 900RPM!!!!!, I stated about them idling higher before, but now I remember that it was when the car was cold, and it was in warmup mode. I also had a convo with a tuner that tunes their cars, and he told me that a 1600cc injector has a resistance of 5 ohms and therefore makes them easier to control even though it's a big injector. Another note is that there are certain 9sec rotaries that everyone knows about out there that ARE FOR A FACT running these setups and will not admit, or lie about it because it's kinda like an "advantage" thing, they say it can't be done, meanwhile it is being done(even by some hardcore guys on this forum, that don't give anything up). So does anyone who's running this setup have anything to say about this, or are we just gonna play stupid? Ralph from Xcessive, I need to speak to you, lemme know when's the best time to reach you at the shop so we can talk about this.
OK guys a little update on the 1600cc primary injector subject, I spoke to some of my friends on the subject that have this setup and guess what?, their cars idle at 900RPM!!!!!, I stated about them idling higher before, but now I remember that it was when the car was cold, and it was in warmup mode. I also had a convo with a tuner that tunes their cars, and he told me that a 1600cc injector has a resistance of 5 ohms and therefore makes them easier to control even though it's a big injector. Another note is that there are certain 9sec rotaries that everyone knows about out there that ARE FOR A FACT running these setups and will not admit, or lie about it because it's kinda like an "advantage" thing, they say it can't be done, meanwhile it is being done(even by some hardcore guys on this forum, that don't give anything up). So does anyone who's running this setup have anything to say about this, or are we just gonna play stupid? Ralph from Xcessive, I need to speak to you, lemme know when's the best time to reach you at the shop so we can talk about this.


