Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

"Optimum" EGT's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-05, 05:23 PM
  #26  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
I've noticed the low EGT's on the highway with my TII as well.
AFR in the 14's, timing around 32-34* BTDC, EGT around 650-700C (1200-1300F).
Probe is about 6" down the DP.
Tuned by Steve Kan.
Again, what RPM's?
Are we talking about high cruising?
If it's light load stuff (all in vacuum), advance the **** out of the ignition.
I run like 40 degrees+ of ignition timing in vacuum areas at high RPM's.
This burns more cleaner, and the big ignition doesn't hurt the motor in the vacuum ranges.
In your set-up, you should be getting EGT's easily over 700C...try more like 750C is ideal.



-Ted
Old 03-08-05, 05:25 PM
  #27  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by jreynish
I am currious what are you guy's seeing at iddle I seet between 400 and 500 deg C, and then when I step on it even when I start to boost .5 bar I only see tepms as high as 600 Deg c. is my timming advanced too much?
Oops, forgot this one...

Idle EGT's are almost dead on 480C on most of the cars I've messed with.
Once engine temps (i.e. coolant) is warm, I typically see 480C.
If you boost the engine hard and let the EGT's come down, it will sometimes stabilize at 500C to 520C - this is still okay.
This is ignition timing set as factory specs - leading firing at -5, 15 degree split, wastespark'd leadings.


-Ted
Old 03-08-05, 06:19 PM
  #28  
New Project on the Way...

iTrader: (2)
 
jreynish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Yellowknife, NT
Posts: 3,763
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
WOT = redline?
What kinda ignition timing advance are you running at those points?
If you're getting 600C @ 4k - 7k, the EGT's are too low.
Since AFR's are ok, I think you're ignition timing is too retarded.
I would run about 25 to 30 degrees of total ignition advance at 7psi.


-Ted
at 4000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 5000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 6000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 7000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 8000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees

and arround there I am seing 650 Deg C MAX that is with the probe located 4 inches behind the turbo outlet in the DP.
what is the max retarted for timming 15 deg for high boost? I haven't tuned above .5 bar yet.
Old 03-08-05, 08:05 PM
  #29  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,093
Received 512 Likes on 287 Posts
steve kan did not tune my car but loaded a map he thought might work when it was able to run.

i have since logged 79 runs and of course have changed almost everything but have retained. untouched, the ignition map. i will only look at it when i refire in a couple of weeks and will have 2 loggable egts.

comparing your IGL w mine at .5 bar and considering that you are running cold i would conclude that there is a good chance your ignition at .5 bar has too much advance.

i run:

4000 15
5000 17
6000 18
7000 20
8000 23 all w a conservative 14 split.

your combustion may be happening too early and the heat is being disapated thru the engine's interior surfaces. if this is the case you are going to be down on torque.

as Ted Sed, be careful w ignition or you will be motor shopping.

good luck,

howard coleman
Old 03-08-05, 08:24 PM
  #30  
New Project on the Way...

iTrader: (2)
 
jreynish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Yellowknife, NT
Posts: 3,763
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
would you mind shooting me a copy of your map so that I can compare your ignition map with mine? Either Ted or Howard?
Thanks again,
jeffrey
clockstick@shaw.ca
Old 03-09-05, 11:45 AM
  #31  
Rotary Freak

 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
23 degrees timing is fine for 7psi (.5bar). I have ran as much as 29 degrees before w/o any issues. If anything, I would be careful more on the split timing than the actual advanced timing. There're two basic method of timing map, step timing and flat timing. either will be fine. The difference between the two is that one will retain more heat for more higher rpm hp while the other will have faster response but trailing off top than the other.




Originally Posted by howard coleman
steve kan did not tune my car but loaded a map he thought might work when it was able to run.

i have since logged 79 runs and of course have changed almost everything but have retained. untouched, the ignition map. i will only look at it when i refire in a couple of weeks and will have 2 loggable egts.

comparing your IGL w mine at .5 bar and considering that you are running cold i would conclude that there is a good chance your ignition at .5 bar has too much advance.

i run:

4000 15
5000 17
6000 18
7000 20
8000 23 all w a conservative 14 split.

your combustion may be happening too early and the heat is being disapated thru the engine's interior surfaces. if this is the case you are going to be down on torque.

as Ted Sed, be careful w ignition or you will be motor shopping.

good luck,

howard coleman
Old 03-09-05, 02:57 PM
  #32  
Brother of the Rotary

iTrader: (2)
 
eViLRotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RETed
Again, what RPM's?
Are we talking about high cruising?
If it's light load stuff (all in vacuum), advance the **** out of the ignition.
I run like 40 degrees+ of ignition timing in vacuum areas at high RPM's.
This burns more cleaner, and the big ignition doesn't hurt the motor in the vacuum ranges.
In your set-up, you should be getting EGT's easily over 700C...try more like 750C is ideal.



-Ted
I my case we are talking about 5th gear 70mph so around 3200 rpm(?).
My timing advance is 34* there.
Old 03-09-05, 05:18 PM
  #33  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
I my case we are talking about 5th gear 70mph so around 3200 rpm(?).
My timing advance is 34* there.
Light load, right?
We're not talking under boost or WOT?

If it's light load in vacuum, you can run more ignition advance there.
I typically run around 40-degrees or even more.
I've had ignition maps run up to 50-degrees there just to see what it would do.
So as a rule of thumb, around 4kRPM, most of my vacuum ranges are running around 40 - 46 degrees of ignition advance.

Keep in mind, stock ignition maps (at least for a Cosmo) runs about 40-degrees of ignition advance in the high RPM / vacuum ranges.


-Ted
Old 03-09-05, 05:20 PM
  #34  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by pluto
23 degrees timing is fine for 7psi (.5bar). I have ran as much as 29 degrees before w/o any issues. If anything, I would be careful more on the split timing than the actual advanced timing. There're two basic method of timing map, step timing and flat timing. either will be fine. The difference between the two is that one will retain more heat for more higher rpm hp while the other will have faster response but trailing off top than the other.
pluto makes a good point...
Once of the variables that's been pretty much ignored is the split ignition timing.
Small changes in split timing can affect EGT's and power significantly.


-Ted
Old 03-09-05, 05:36 PM
  #35  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
88fc3sw/HX83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hmm, now I'm wondering if it's better to run MORE advance with MORE spilt or LESS advance with LESS split?...talk about confusing
Old 03-09-05, 05:57 PM
  #36  
Brother of the Rotary

iTrader: (2)
 
eViLRotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arkham Asylum
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 88fc3sw/HX83
hmm, now I'm wondering if it's better to run MORE advance with MORE spilt or LESS advance with LESS split?...talk about confusing
Haha. Time to go back to the Split Timing megathread
Old 03-09-05, 07:27 PM
  #37  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,093
Received 512 Likes on 287 Posts
one of the problems re finding the optimum ignition matrix is that most of us have tuned for afrs and do not as yet monitor egts.

i do think that egts are the essential missing part of ignition tuning and there is significant power and durability to be had by those that log egts while tuning.

i know steve kan has utilized egts to a great extent while on the dyno and ted has run an egt gauge for years. with the myriad of engine states of tune and turbos we are all wandering around as to our ignition maps til we start measuring/logging egts.

howard coleman
Old 03-09-05, 09:18 PM
  #38  
Full Member

 
LDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: OC
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by howard coleman
if you are firing early your egts will be low due to the increased time for the explosive force and temp to cool before heading out the exhaust.

firing too late creates the opposite effect: too much of the force rushes out the port instead of driving the rotor. result more exhaust temp. an early opening exhaust port also can be a cause of higher egts for the same reason.

howard coleman
Originally Posted by RETed
It's hard to say.

Get too much ignition timing (advance) - power will drop, but EGT's will rise!
Get too little ignition timing (retard) - power will drop, but EGT's will drop.
These seem contradicting to me. Anyone care to shed light on which is true?

Cheers,
Lam
Old 03-11-05, 04:03 AM
  #39  
GearHeadMoFo

iTrader: (1)
 
1234rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bump
Old 03-12-05, 04:15 PM
  #40  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
88fc3sw/HX83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
anymore info? Tuners?
Old 03-17-05, 05:39 PM
  #41  
B.G.O.B.G.A.I.

 
Travelintrevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LDawg
These seem contradicting to me. Anyone care to shed light on which is true?

Cheers,
Lam
no they dont..Reted said on page two that

"Extreme ignition retard will actually cause fuel to burn out the exhaust, which WILL cause EGT's to RISE - this one stumps a lot of people"
Old 03-31-05, 09:35 AM
  #42  
Mark White admirer

 
Lynn Bordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peak at Stoich!

Highest EGTs are at stoichiometry mixture about 14.7-15.0 AFR. (www.sdsefi.com) Aircraft normally richen their mixtures to the cool side of peak for cruise. There is now a thought that they can lean the mixture to the same temperature on the other (lean) side of peak EGT for best fuel economy. My car has cruised at 16 AFR smoothly, but I am afraid to push this experiment. What are your thoughts?
Barry
Old 04-01-05, 01:18 AM
  #43  
Microtech Tuning!

 
Infini IV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 626 Socal
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by howard coleman
steve kan did not tune my car but loaded a map he thought might work when it was able to run.

i have since logged 79 runs and of course have changed almost everything but have retained. untouched, the ignition map. i will only look at it when i refire in a couple of weeks and will have 2 loggable egts.

comparing your IGL w mine at .5 bar and considering that you are running cold i would conclude that there is a good chance your ignition at .5 bar has too much advance.

i run:

4000 15
5000 17
6000 18
7000 20
8000 23 all w a conservative 14 split.

your combustion may be happening too early and the heat is being disapated thru the engine's interior surfaces. if this is the case you are going to be down on torque.

as Ted Sed, be careful w ignition or you will be motor shopping.

good luck,

howard coleman
Are those timing figures for your twin T04 setup? (You are running twin T04's right? )
Old 04-01-05, 06:31 AM
  #44  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,093
Received 512 Likes on 287 Posts
yes..

i will be up and running w a new engine, larger compressors and loggable fuel pressure and (2) egts by wednesday of next week. if i learn anything helpful i will post it.

howard coleman
Old 04-01-05, 08:13 AM
  #45  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,807
Received 305 Likes on 265 Posts
there's a lot of very good info here ...
Old 04-03-06, 12:44 AM
  #46  
Senior Member

 
89t295k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Such good info. Such an old thread.

I noticed on that data log posted, a pattern of 5 spaces apears to be the delay or .6-.7sec for the sensor to pick it up. We need more datalogs of egts.

Is the base egt found by playing under vac then used as a max for wot?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
immanuel__7
Megasquirt Forum
3
08-22-15 09:34 PM



Quick Reply: "Optimum" EGT's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.