Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

"Optimum" EGT's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 05:23 PM
  #26  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
I've noticed the low EGT's on the highway with my TII as well.
AFR in the 14's, timing around 32-34* BTDC, EGT around 650-700C (1200-1300F).
Probe is about 6" down the DP.
Tuned by Steve Kan.
Again, what RPM's?
Are we talking about high cruising?
If it's light load stuff (all in vacuum), advance the **** out of the ignition.
I run like 40 degrees+ of ignition timing in vacuum areas at high RPM's.
This burns more cleaner, and the big ignition doesn't hurt the motor in the vacuum ranges.
In your set-up, you should be getting EGT's easily over 700C...try more like 750C is ideal.



-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #27  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by jreynish
I am currious what are you guy's seeing at iddle I seet between 400 and 500 deg C, and then when I step on it even when I start to boost .5 bar I only see tepms as high as 600 Deg c. is my timming advanced too much?
Oops, forgot this one...

Idle EGT's are almost dead on 480C on most of the cars I've messed with.
Once engine temps (i.e. coolant) is warm, I typically see 480C.
If you boost the engine hard and let the EGT's come down, it will sometimes stabilize at 500C to 520C - this is still okay.
This is ignition timing set as factory specs - leading firing at -5, 15 degree split, wastespark'd leadings.


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #28  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 6
From: Yellowknife, NT
Originally Posted by RETed
WOT = redline?
What kinda ignition timing advance are you running at those points?
If you're getting 600C @ 4k - 7k, the EGT's are too low.
Since AFR's are ok, I think you're ignition timing is too retarded.
I would run about 25 to 30 degrees of total ignition advance at 7psi.


-Ted
at 4000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 5000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 6000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 7000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees
at 8000 rpm at .5 bar boost, timming is 23 degrees

and arround there I am seing 650 Deg C MAX that is with the probe located 4 inches behind the turbo outlet in the DP.
what is the max retarted for timming 15 deg for high boost? I haven't tuned above .5 bar yet.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 08:05 PM
  #29  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
steve kan did not tune my car but loaded a map he thought might work when it was able to run.

i have since logged 79 runs and of course have changed almost everything but have retained. untouched, the ignition map. i will only look at it when i refire in a couple of weeks and will have 2 loggable egts.

comparing your IGL w mine at .5 bar and considering that you are running cold i would conclude that there is a good chance your ignition at .5 bar has too much advance.

i run:

4000 15
5000 17
6000 18
7000 20
8000 23 all w a conservative 14 split.

your combustion may be happening too early and the heat is being disapated thru the engine's interior surfaces. if this is the case you are going to be down on torque.

as Ted Sed, be careful w ignition or you will be motor shopping.

good luck,

howard coleman
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #30  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 6
From: Yellowknife, NT
would you mind shooting me a copy of your map so that I can compare your ignition map with mine? Either Ted or Howard?
Thanks again,
jeffrey
clockstick@shaw.ca
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #31  
pluto's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, tx, usa
23 degrees timing is fine for 7psi (.5bar). I have ran as much as 29 degrees before w/o any issues. If anything, I would be careful more on the split timing than the actual advanced timing. There're two basic method of timing map, step timing and flat timing. either will be fine. The difference between the two is that one will retain more heat for more higher rpm hp while the other will have faster response but trailing off top than the other.




Originally Posted by howard coleman
steve kan did not tune my car but loaded a map he thought might work when it was able to run.

i have since logged 79 runs and of course have changed almost everything but have retained. untouched, the ignition map. i will only look at it when i refire in a couple of weeks and will have 2 loggable egts.

comparing your IGL w mine at .5 bar and considering that you are running cold i would conclude that there is a good chance your ignition at .5 bar has too much advance.

i run:

4000 15
5000 17
6000 18
7000 20
8000 23 all w a conservative 14 split.

your combustion may be happening too early and the heat is being disapated thru the engine's interior surfaces. if this is the case you are going to be down on torque.

as Ted Sed, be careful w ignition or you will be motor shopping.

good luck,

howard coleman
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 02:57 PM
  #32  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Originally Posted by RETed
Again, what RPM's?
Are we talking about high cruising?
If it's light load stuff (all in vacuum), advance the **** out of the ignition.
I run like 40 degrees+ of ignition timing in vacuum areas at high RPM's.
This burns more cleaner, and the big ignition doesn't hurt the motor in the vacuum ranges.
In your set-up, you should be getting EGT's easily over 700C...try more like 750C is ideal.



-Ted
I my case we are talking about 5th gear 70mph so around 3200 rpm(?).
My timing advance is 34* there.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #33  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
I my case we are talking about 5th gear 70mph so around 3200 rpm(?).
My timing advance is 34* there.
Light load, right?
We're not talking under boost or WOT?

If it's light load in vacuum, you can run more ignition advance there.
I typically run around 40-degrees or even more.
I've had ignition maps run up to 50-degrees there just to see what it would do.
So as a rule of thumb, around 4kRPM, most of my vacuum ranges are running around 40 - 46 degrees of ignition advance.

Keep in mind, stock ignition maps (at least for a Cosmo) runs about 40-degrees of ignition advance in the high RPM / vacuum ranges.


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #34  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by pluto
23 degrees timing is fine for 7psi (.5bar). I have ran as much as 29 degrees before w/o any issues. If anything, I would be careful more on the split timing than the actual advanced timing. There're two basic method of timing map, step timing and flat timing. either will be fine. The difference between the two is that one will retain more heat for more higher rpm hp while the other will have faster response but trailing off top than the other.
pluto makes a good point...
Once of the variables that's been pretty much ignored is the split ignition timing.
Small changes in split timing can affect EGT's and power significantly.


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #35  
88fc3sw/HX83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Oregon
hmm, now I'm wondering if it's better to run MORE advance with MORE spilt or LESS advance with LESS split?...talk about confusing
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #36  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Originally Posted by 88fc3sw/HX83
hmm, now I'm wondering if it's better to run MORE advance with MORE spilt or LESS advance with LESS split?...talk about confusing
Haha. Time to go back to the Split Timing megathread
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #37  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
one of the problems re finding the optimum ignition matrix is that most of us have tuned for afrs and do not as yet monitor egts.

i do think that egts are the essential missing part of ignition tuning and there is significant power and durability to be had by those that log egts while tuning.

i know steve kan has utilized egts to a great extent while on the dyno and ted has run an egt gauge for years. with the myriad of engine states of tune and turbos we are all wandering around as to our ignition maps til we start measuring/logging egts.

howard coleman
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #38  
LDawg's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by howard coleman
if you are firing early your egts will be low due to the increased time for the explosive force and temp to cool before heading out the exhaust.

firing too late creates the opposite effect: too much of the force rushes out the port instead of driving the rotor. result more exhaust temp. an early opening exhaust port also can be a cause of higher egts for the same reason.

howard coleman
Originally Posted by RETed
It's hard to say.

Get too much ignition timing (advance) - power will drop, but EGT's will rise!
Get too little ignition timing (retard) - power will drop, but EGT's will drop.
These seem contradicting to me. Anyone care to shed light on which is true?

Cheers,
Lam
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 04:03 AM
  #39  
1234rotor's Avatar
GearHeadMoFo
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: ATL, GA
bump
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #40  
88fc3sw/HX83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Oregon
anymore info? Tuners?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #41  
Travelintrevor's Avatar
B.G.O.B.G.A.I.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: EUROPE
Originally Posted by LDawg
These seem contradicting to me. Anyone care to shed light on which is true?

Cheers,
Lam
no they dont..Reted said on page two that

"Extreme ignition retard will actually cause fuel to burn out the exhaust, which WILL cause EGT's to RISE - this one stumps a lot of people"
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #42  
Lynn Bordes's Avatar
Mark White admirer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Slidell, LA
Peak at Stoich!

Highest EGTs are at stoichiometry mixture about 14.7-15.0 AFR. (www.sdsefi.com) Aircraft normally richen their mixtures to the cool side of peak for cruise. There is now a thought that they can lean the mixture to the same temperature on the other (lean) side of peak EGT for best fuel economy. My car has cruised at 16 AFR smoothly, but I am afraid to push this experiment. What are your thoughts?
Barry
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 01:18 AM
  #43  
Infini IV's Avatar
Microtech Tuning!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: 626 Socal
Originally Posted by howard coleman
steve kan did not tune my car but loaded a map he thought might work when it was able to run.

i have since logged 79 runs and of course have changed almost everything but have retained. untouched, the ignition map. i will only look at it when i refire in a couple of weeks and will have 2 loggable egts.

comparing your IGL w mine at .5 bar and considering that you are running cold i would conclude that there is a good chance your ignition at .5 bar has too much advance.

i run:

4000 15
5000 17
6000 18
7000 20
8000 23 all w a conservative 14 split.

your combustion may be happening too early and the heat is being disapated thru the engine's interior surfaces. if this is the case you are going to be down on torque.

as Ted Sed, be careful w ignition or you will be motor shopping.

good luck,

howard coleman
Are those timing figures for your twin T04 setup? (You are running twin T04's right? )
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 06:31 AM
  #44  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
yes..

i will be up and running w a new engine, larger compressors and loggable fuel pressure and (2) egts by wednesday of next week. if i learn anything helpful i will post it.

howard coleman
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #45  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
there's a lot of very good info here ...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #46  
89t295k's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 342
Likes: 1
From: Boise, Idaho
Such good info. Such an old thread.

I noticed on that data log posted, a pattern of 5 spaces apears to be the delay or .6-.7sec for the sensor to pick it up. We need more datalogs of egts.

Is the base egt found by playing under vac then used as a max for wot?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
immanuel__7
Megasquirt Forum
3
Aug 22, 2015 09:34 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.