more pictures on engine porting
#2
inteligent extratarestril
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Sunny B.O.P, New Zealand
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
who ported that, u or a "pro" shop?
they have overlapped the ports into the area the oil seal needs, be prepared to suffer oil leakage, then thru your plates away and get some more and get them ported by someone who DOES know what they are doing.
they have overlapped the ports into the area the oil seal needs, be prepared to suffer oil leakage, then thru your plates away and get some more and get them ported by someone who DOES know what they are doing.
#3
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The First State
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by HWO
who ported that, u or a "pro" shop?
they have overlapped the ports into the area the oil seal needs, be prepared to suffer oil leakage, then thru your plates away and get some more and get them ported by someone who DOES know what they are doing.
who ported that, u or a "pro" shop?
they have overlapped the ports into the area the oil seal needs, be prepared to suffer oil leakage, then thru your plates away and get some more and get them ported by someone who DOES know what they are doing.
Last edited by Greg; 10-27-01 at 12:14 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by vosko
yeah Ito knows what he is doing. pepe loco's car only dyno'd 685rwhp yesterday. porting isn't done yet, it should be done next week and the engine assembled too
yeah Ito knows what he is doing. pepe loco's car only dyno'd 685rwhp yesterday. porting isn't done yet, it should be done next week and the engine assembled too
crispeed
87TII
9.20@150mph 1/4
5.91@118mph 1/8
1.32 60ft
651RWHP/522RWTQ
T-72
2600lbs
#9
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oops did i say that out loud ???
Originally posted by crispeed
Only 685 RWHP!
crispeed
87TII
9.20@150mph 1/4
5.91@118mph 1/8
1.32 60ft
651RWHP/522RWTQ
T-72
2600lbs
Only 685 RWHP!
crispeed
87TII
9.20@150mph 1/4
5.91@118mph 1/8
1.32 60ft
651RWHP/522RWTQ
T-72
2600lbs
#11
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by crispeed
Carlos(Pepe Loco) is lucky that he's retiring the Datsun!
I also heard that Ito and Carlos part ways too!
crispeed
Carlos(Pepe Loco) is lucky that he's retiring the Datsun!
I also heard that Ito and Carlos part ways too!
crispeed
#17
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
For the very marginal gain in port opening area (less than 5%)That porting is VERY bad practice!
It will result in excessive outer oil control ring wear due to excessive exposure to raw air fuel mixture, It will not provide any gain in flow due to port timming improvement as for a large majority of the time the extra area ported is covered by the rotor side...
It is a very stupid example of engine porting, I highly recommend not going into the oil control ring area. The performance gains are questionable at best (port does not open any earlier and does not close any later) and it will deteriorate oil control ring performance + make the engine more prone to blow by.
There are no good reasons I can see for doing this ?
It will result in excessive outer oil control ring wear due to excessive exposure to raw air fuel mixture, It will not provide any gain in flow due to port timming improvement as for a large majority of the time the extra area ported is covered by the rotor side...
It is a very stupid example of engine porting, I highly recommend not going into the oil control ring area. The performance gains are questionable at best (port does not open any earlier and does not close any later) and it will deteriorate oil control ring performance + make the engine more prone to blow by.
There are no good reasons I can see for doing this ?
#18
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RICE RACING
For the very marginal gain in port opening area (less than 5%)That porting is VERY bad practice!
It will result in excessive outer oil control ring wear due to excessive exposure to raw air fuel mixture, It will not provide any gain in flow due to port timming improvement as for a large majority of the time the extra area ported is covered by the rotor side...
It is a very stupid example of engine porting, I highly recommend not going into the oil control ring area. The performance gains are questionable at best (port does not open any earlier and does not close any later) and it will deteriorate oil control ring performance + make the engine more prone to blow by.
There are no good reasons I can see for doing this ?
For the very marginal gain in port opening area (less than 5%)That porting is VERY bad practice!
It will result in excessive outer oil control ring wear due to excessive exposure to raw air fuel mixture, It will not provide any gain in flow due to port timming improvement as for a large majority of the time the extra area ported is covered by the rotor side...
It is a very stupid example of engine porting, I highly recommend not going into the oil control ring area. The performance gains are questionable at best (port does not open any earlier and does not close any later) and it will deteriorate oil control ring performance + make the engine more prone to blow by.
There are no good reasons I can see for doing this ?
#21
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is a pic of the unported housing. is it possible you guys are looking at it wrong ??????? that ring isn't the oil line ring!!!!!
Last edited by vosko; 10-28-01 at 08:48 PM.