Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Mazda scientifically tests oil vs water cooled turbos

Old Aug 19, 2011 | 01:05 AM
  #1  
arghx's Avatar
Thread Starter
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 460
From: cold
Mazda scientifically tests oil vs water cooled turbos

Bumpstart was kind enough to scan the turbo engine section of the series 4 Rx-7 training manual which is basically a Service highlights style document. I'm always on the lookout for random tidbits of information, and I noticed in here that Mazda studied the temperature difference in an oil cooled vs water cooled [presumably stock] turbo:



You can see that with the oil cooled turbo, the temperature of the "metal" (probably the turbo CHRA) shoots up after shutdown and remains more than 100C hotter than the comparable water cooled turbo.
Attached Thumbnails Mazda scientifically tests oil vs water cooled turbos-oil_vs_water_cooled.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 02:58 AM
  #2  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
I deliberately built my s5 highflow turbo with a non water cooled chra for simplicity reasons.

I also tend towards non water cooled journal bearing turns when buying new. Lets be realistic. They are still going to need overhauls after 60 000 - 100 000 kms anyway.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 08:42 AM
  #3  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Nice post, but apparently it is beyond the comprehension of the simplistic general public.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 08:56 AM
  #4  
madbouncy's Avatar
tard of teh century
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH
Very cool little graph to show the difference, definitely makes me glad I'm running water cooled. Garrett posted up a little pdf on water cooled turbos as well and shows a picture of the chra and what they're getting at with the oil coking.

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...er_Cooling.pdf

You guys have probably seen it but I figure I'll post it anyways, I just liked seeing what was actually happening to the turbo on the inside with the oil residue as I've only taken apart a couple turbos and they were both watercooled.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 09:30 AM
  #5  
gameover2145's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 150
Likes: 1
From: Louisville, Kentucky
Great info. Simply shows that water cooling is effective and worthwhile.

I don't see the point in not setting up a water cooling system on an aftermarket turbocharger considering our engines already have ports for the lines. Pretty simple setup.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
arghx's Avatar
Thread Starter
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 460
From: cold
For the record, clearly running water cooled is better for the turbo. But I do not currently have an oil cooled turbo on my personal 7. There are a few reasons for this

1) The T04R turbo I have is journal bearing but I would not run a ball bearing turbo without water cooling

2) I don't drive the car much-- 2-3 thousand miles a year, and I change the oil every thousand miles or so

3) I wanted simpler plumbing

4) I got the turbo used and I didn't feel like spending more money (cheap bastard)

5) I am willing to wait a few seconds to cool it down before I shut the engine down, but as the graph above shows that probably has limited effectiveness

6) And MOST IMPORTANTLY... If I am running a turbo blanket and no blowoff valve I might as well abuse the turbo even more I am genuinely curious how long the turbo will last with me doing everything wrong
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
Barry Bordes's Avatar
"Elusive, not deceptive!”
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 930
Likes: 13
From: Slidell, LA
Originally Posted by arghx
For the record, clearly running water cooled is better for the turbo. But I do not currently have an oil cooled turbo on my personal 7. There are a few reasons for this

1) The T04R turbo I have is journal bearing but I would not run a ball bearing turbo without water cooling

2) I don't drive the car much-- 2-3 thousand miles a year, and I change the oil every thousand miles or so

3) I wanted simpler plumbing

4) I got the turbo used and I didn't feel like spending more money (cheap bastard)

5) I am willing to wait a few seconds to cool it down before I shut the engine down, but as the graph above shows that probably has limited effectiveness

6) And MOST IMPORTANTLY... If I am running a turbo blanket and no blowoff valve I might as well abuse the turbo even more I am genuinely curious how long the turbo will last with me doing everything wrong
Raymond, I think you meant water cooled turbo.

On turbine engines we use a 2 minute cool down before shutting down the engine.

This is also the orginal purpose for turbo timers. ( driving slowly back through the subdivision for 2 mins. counts also)

Barry
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #8  
arghx's Avatar
Thread Starter
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 460
From: cold
yes, I am not running a water cooled turbo currently.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #9  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,552
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by arghx
6) And MOST IMPORTANTLY... If I am running a turbo blanket and no blowoff valve I might as well abuse the turbo even more I am genuinely curious how long the turbo will last with me doing everything wrong
My latest personal fd will be fired up next week, running a 67mm ball bearing Garrett(500R). I too will NOT use a BOV, NOT use water/coolant to cool it, WILL use a turbo blanket and likely spray water/meth pre-turbo. In the grand scheme of things the cost of the turbo is really not a big deal when you consider all the other maintenance that goes into these cars if you want to keep them nice.

Great info you posted though. I know a lot of us dont say it enough, but we all appreciate all the info you dig up on these cars/engines. Keep it up.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 04:51 AM
  #10  
Jobro's Avatar
SAE Junkie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 12
From: OZ/AU
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Nice post, but apparently it is beyond the comprehension of the simplistic general public.
Diamonds are forever.

Turbos are most certainly not. Turbochargers are a consumable
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 11:17 AM
  #11  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
More heat is never good, period.
The extent to which it is detrimental may be debatable and may even ultimately be proven to be negligible, but it is undeniable. Choosing not to use water cooling on a turbo AND engine that is already setup for it is just lazy (and cheap). Choosing not to add it on an engine/turbo not set up with such accommodations is a slightly different story.

Thanks for the info! Always enlightening.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 01:11 PM
  #12  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
I wonder how the oil less, water cooled turbos hold up?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2012 | 01:26 PM
  #13  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,793
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Does anyone have any experience with the new oil-cooled ball bearing Precision turbos and/or oil cooled BW turbos on the road race course? Precision claims their newest oil/air cooled center sections work well without the water cooling...... I'm not really convinced yet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
efini7
Test Area 51
1
Sep 4, 2015 02:59 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.