Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Maxed Out GT35R T3 on the Dyno.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #26  
Busted7's Avatar
Will work for horsepower
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, MO
Congrats on the numbers, and it showes the potentential is there with a turbo upgrade.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #27  
docmar's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Congrats very impressive result.

Your motor is very efficient concerning the turbo and the amount of pressure.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #28  
turboR1's Avatar
ErnieTKiLLA
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by AMRX7
Do you think the boost comes on a little late? It looks like things don't really start getting going until 4600rpm or so. I'd think with a T3 1.06 you should see that boost 500rpm sooner. Is there a reason for that or am I missing something?

-Andy
I dunno, but on the street the WG is fully open and screaming at 4100 rpm. It pulls like an animal up top.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #29  
RX794's Avatar
NYC's Loudest FD
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Nice #s
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #30  
darkside7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
From: tx
is this with a ported engine?
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #31  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
Originally Posted by darkside7
is this with a ported engine?
At the beginning he states it's a streetport.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #32  
turboR1's Avatar
ErnieTKiLLA
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by Busted7
Congrats on the numbers, and it showes the potentential is there with a turbo upgrade.
yea, I was hoping the GT35r would take at least 25psi. So it looks like I'll be putting on a little bit bigger turbo and hopefully be able to get 30psi.

But this will keep me busy threw the summer. Shooting for mid 10's. Hopefully I can pull off your 60ft times. Car weighs 2590 lbs. 2760lbs w me in it.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #33  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by turboR1
yea, I was hoping the GT35r would take at least 25psi. So it looks like I'll be putting on a little bit bigger turbo and hopefully be able to get 30psi.

But this will keep me busy threw the summer. Shooting for mid 10's. Hopefully I can pull off your 60ft times. Car weighs 2590 lbs. 2760lbs w me in it.
The efficiency starts to suck well before it runs out of breath. A "little bit bigger turbo" will not be efficient at 30 psi. Go 2 sizes up. Read the compressor maps and stay above 65% efficiency. A gt4088 will NOT get you there with any efficiency. A gt4094 will get you there, but may as well go with a gt4294 and get all the benefits of the larger hot-side. The gt4294 WILL RESPOND just as quickly as the gt4094.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #34  
docmar's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Greece
However, how can you say that the gt35 has nothing else to give, when she has the capability to produce more than 60 lbs of air...
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #35  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by docmar
However, how can you say that the gt35 has nothing else to give, when she has the capability to produce more than 60 lbs of air...

gt3571 or gt3582?

gt3571 maxed out around 42 lbs
gt3582 maxed out around 60 lbs

None of the above matters if the other half of the turbocharger (hot side) can't flow, which is the case here with a T3 hot side.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 10:15 AM
  #36  
turboR1's Avatar
ErnieTKiLLA
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by Old Slow Coach
The efficiency starts to suck well before it runs out of breath. A "little bit bigger turbo" will not be efficient at 30 psi. Go 2 sizes up. Read the compressor maps and stay above 65% efficiency. A gt4088 will NOT get you there with any efficiency. A gt4094 will get you there, but may as well go with a gt4294 and get all the benefits of the larger hot-side. The gt4294 WILL RESPOND just as quickly as the gt4094.

First. Dont assume, you dont know what I mean when I say little bit bigger.

Second, you want to talk about my efficiency sucking meanwhile it takes you 22psi to even come close to my numbers at 15psi. Focus on your own setup, If I want your opinion Ill ask you.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #37  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
Keep the bickering out of the thread please, and to be honest I would agree that it drops off pretty quickly well before 22psi. At the same time a 67mm with a better A/r comp cover would get you there in a smallish package and still be reasonably responsive.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #38  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by turboR1
First. Dont assume, you dont know what I mean when I say little bit bigger.

Second, you want to talk about my efficiency sucking meanwhile it takes you 22psi to even come close to my numbers at 15psi. Focus on your own setup, If I want your opinion Ill ask you.

The fact that I chose a really conservative tune on my set-up has NOTHING to do with the fact that striving for 25 psi on yours is ill advised. Good day!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #39  
turboR1's Avatar
ErnieTKiLLA
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by Old Slow Coach
The fact that I chose a really conservative tune on my set-up has NOTHING to do with the fact that striving for 25 psi on yours is ill advised. Good day!
Obvisouly things need to be changed if I want more then 23 psi. hence the reason the thread is called maxed out gt35. From 19psi to 23psi it made 11rwhp more so Yes obvisouly its not efficient anymore.. Thanks for pointing that out for us. no point in running more then 20psi the way it is.

And my tune is plenty conservative.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #40  
JazzyFD's Avatar
In 7th heaven
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 1
From: Uniondale, New York
What did you tune with.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #41  
Chaotic_FC's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: paradise Florida
Originally Posted by turboR1

And my tune is plenty conservative.

wonder what kind of power you'd make with a non-conservative tune.. it'd be impressive.. thats for sure
not that what you have isn't already amazing
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #42  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
Originally Posted by turboR1
From 19psi to 23psi it made 11rwhp more so Yes obvisouly its not efficient anymore..
Exactly what I have noticed here, over 18psi it falls off pretty quickly. You might pickup a bit more with the T4 1.0 and would get better response than the T3 1.06, but I am very comfortable with your findings with enzo behind your tune. Like I said earlier I bet the car is a blast to drive.

~S~
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #43  
enzo250's Avatar
Thread Starter
IRS Champion
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
Originally Posted by docmar
Congrats very impressive result.

Your motor is very efficient concerning the turbo and the amount of pressure.
Thanks to biaggi from Thunder Racing for a great engine...
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #44  
turboR1's Avatar
ErnieTKiLLA
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by enzo250
Thanks to biaggi from Thunder Racing for a great engine...
wtf. I just signed on to write that.

Again special thanks to Rodney aka Biaggi aka Thunder Racing for building a great motor.


ECU is an Autronic Sm2 tuned by Enzo Racing.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 05:47 AM
  #45  
FDRyder's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: anaheim
hey enzo250 ,what size is your T3? is it .82?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 06:13 AM
  #46  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Thats awesome Enzo, especially on a T3 frame.
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #47  
dabigesii's Avatar
Back to basics
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 855
Likes: 12
From: Crescent City
Wow, that is amazing!!! Very nice numbers, must be awesome to drive.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #48  
ICE_Pilot's Avatar
V8-TZR
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Mine makes 588whp on 20psi with 98ron 10% ethanol & water injection. Large extended port motor. AFR 11.5 & 80% duty cycle
470whp @ 15psi. Power FC tuned by Steve Rossan the creator of FC-Datalogit.

Same dyno. (DynoDynamics)
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #49  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

In your 20B maybe, other than that your FULL OF S#$$%
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #50  
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
*** Bless The USA
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis / Illinois
Mine puts out 1.21 gigawatts to each tire
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.