Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

just dyno'd precision 6262 .84 on a ported engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2013 | 10:19 PM
  #1  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
just dyno'd precision 6262 .84 on a ported engine

i made a post about the precision 6262 .84 asking if it is too small.

my setup is:
pineapple streetports
haltech PS1k
550 primaries, ID2000 secondaries
turblown divided manifold, older single wastegate style
tial MVR 44mm wastegate vented to atmosphere
11psi wastegate spring
3" downpipe and full 3" exhaust

well i dyno'd and tuned tonight, and when i started doing full pulls, i'd make it to about 6000rpms before the boost would shoot up to ~16psi and hit my boost cut.

anyway, it was at about 320whp at 11psi and 6000rpms.

i'll post a datalog for any of the haltech platinum guys. this run made it to 340whp before hitting the boost cut.

time to sell it for a 6766 or a s360. i'm now thinking a 1.00 or .96+ turbine housing?
Attached Files
File Type: zip
log3.zip (28.2 KB, 69 views)
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 10:35 PM
  #2  
abc's Avatar
abc
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Central
Sounds about right for your setup. You'll probably enjoy a bigger turbine housing if your deciding to switch. Nonetheless 300whp rx7's are fun on the streets!
You'll be surprise how fast a 1.06 turbine spools on a stock ported 13b. Congrats on the dyno!

Last edited by abc; May 13, 2013 at 10:38 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 10:44 PM
  #3  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Why not correct the overboosting issue and see what the car can really do?

I absolutely would not move to something like a 6766 from what you have, that's a few steps up the chain and you won't be happy with the response IMO. Seems silly to just install another turbo before you know what the one you have can do

What are your power goals and planned boost settings?
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 11:01 PM
  #4  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
rich, how do you propose i fix the overboosting issue without changing turbos? i'll be expecting a good response

my goal for this car is to road race with ~350whp and ~10-11psi and "good" response.
Reply
Old May 13, 2013 | 11:49 PM
  #5  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 846
Likes: 14
From: hsv al
buy my s400sx FMW. 67.7 mm. i even have it listed on tennspeed. 1.10 t4 divided. $900 for you since your suggestions helped me on my starting problems
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 12:21 AM
  #6  
TheAsset's Avatar
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
It sounds like your wastegate isn't sufficient enough. If it's running straight off the spring and still creeping like it is, 44mm isn't enough for ya. 16psi sounds like a good starting point though Just run low boost at that setting.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 12:47 AM
  #7  
Havoc's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 9
From: Australia - Perth
You will get the same problem on a 1:00 or 0.96 AR as well.

I was boost spiking to 28psi at 6000rpm with a Tial 44 on a 1:00. I went dual WG's and fixed the problem.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 06:48 AM
  #8  
junito1's Avatar
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Choosing another turbo will get you in horsepower to psi you want ,but you have an issue and it would be ideal to upgrade to a 60mm wastegate.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 07:09 AM
  #9  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
A 44mm wastegate is sufficient if the manifold is routed properly. I wasn't the first and nobody can really claim to be, but I've had excellent results with dual wastegates for around 5 years now. It seems around 50% of companies are now offering dual wastegates standard.

Again, you should have no problem controlling boost with a single 44mm wastegate. Proper routing of the manifold is crucial for proper wastegate response. I still push dual wastegates as a standard turbo manifold option.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 07:16 AM
  #10  
blue93FDproject's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: panama city, fl
agreed with everyone else so far. stick with that turbo! are you using any AI? if not, fix that and turn the boost up a few more lbs when you correct the wastegate issue
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 07:22 AM
  #11  
seandizzie's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: fwb.florida
You are running off the spring only correct, no boost controller involved/connected?
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 07:48 AM
  #12  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,804
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
rich, how do you propose i fix the overboosting issue without changing turbos? i'll be expecting a good response

my goal for this car is to road race with ~350whp and ~10-11psi and "good" response.
Given your goals you seem to have picked a good turbo, I'd stick with it.

Look into your boost controller line placement and go from there.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 08:47 AM
  #13  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Given your goals you seem to have picked a good turbo, I'd stick with it.

Look into your boost controller line placement and go from there.
rich,
i'm running straight off the 11psi wastegate spring.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 09:17 AM
  #14  
dabigesii's Avatar
Back to basics
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 855
Likes: 12
From: Crescent City
You might want to check you wastegate lines, check for tears or rips in it. Also check the diaphragm for tears. I had this same problem a couple of months ago with my Tial V44 wastegate, it was a combo of a ripped diaphragm and a clogged pressure source line that led to the wastegate. Once I fixed those two problems my boost control was rock solid. I'm running a 6766 @ 20psi on low and 25psi on high (plan on going higher, but my clutch doesn't like it right now). I'd personally stick with your 6262 if those are your power goals as well, should have awesome spool time and still deliver the power you want.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 10:22 AM
  #15  
gear_grinder's Avatar
Don't hate my V8
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
From: Cornfield, Indiana
more boost? the 62mm precision should still be efficient at higher pressures where it should make much more then 300whp.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 11:31 AM
  #16  
seandizzie's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: fwb.florida
check the wastegate and ensure its not in any way damaged and it works. Also check the pressure/reference line for the WG. A 44mm should be enough
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #17  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
seandizzle, i had the wastegate opened up on my table about a week ago, checking the spring combination to make sure it was the 10.5psi combo before going out tuning. the diaphram was fine and everything was nice and clean and it good shape inside.

and let me rephrase the boost creep issue. the boost sits perfectly at 11psi from about 4000-6000rpms, then shoots up to my boost cut (16 psi) at 6500.

i am pretty sure the wastegate is functioning as well as it can.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #18  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,553
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
Its an issue with wastegate or manifold as many have said. Nothing to do with the turbo.
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 11:55 AM
  #19  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
It is not a wastegate, or turbo issue. It is a manifold issue. The wg runners are in the direction of flow, but there is a divider that runs up to the WG valve seat, blocking considerable surface area. The divider must be thick or it will blow out. This divider seperates the pulses completely before the valve opens which helps with boost response. That manifold was never intended for low boost, per the original owner's intentions.

Best solution would be to put in a 1.1 bar spring, and run it at 17psi. If that is not an option, next easiest solution would be a more restricitive exhaust system.

If one wants to run low boost you generally need our new manifold design.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 01:28 PM
  #20  
seandizzie's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: fwb.florida
What manifold is on the car?
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 02:47 PM
  #21  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by seandizzie
What manifold is on the car?
the manifold is one of turblown's earlier single wastegate manifolds, which were designed for higher boost, apparently.


Originally Posted by Turblown
It is not a wastegate, or turbo issue. It is a manifold issue. The wg runners are in the direction of flow, but there is a divider that runs up to the WG valve seat, blocking considerable surface area. The divider must be thick or it will blow out. This divider seperates the pulses completely before the valve opens which helps with boost response. That manifold was never intended for low boost, per the original owner's intentions.

Best solution would be to put in a 1.1 bar spring, and run it at 17psi. If that is not an option, next easiest solution would be a more restricitive exhaust system.

If one wants to run low boost you generally need our new manifold design.
elliot, thanks for the reply. i do get the feeling though that the boost will continue to shoot to infinity though, and not level off at ~17psi...

do your new design manifolds have the same turbo flange location as the one i have?

(attached pic is from previous owner)
Attached Thumbnails just dyno'd precision 6262 .84 on a ported engine-manifold2.jpg  
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 02:58 PM
  #22  
KNONFS's Avatar
B O R I C U A
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 36
From: VA
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
the manifold is one of turblown's earlier single wastegate manifolds, which were designed for higher boost, apparently.




elliot, thanks for the reply. i do get the feeling though that the boost will continue to shoot to infinity though, and not level off at ~17psi...

do your new design manifolds have the same turbo flange location as the one i have?

(attached pic is from previous owner)
IF space allows it, why dont you cut the wastegate tubes off the primaries, and weld a wastegate flange on each exhaust runner? (where the wastegate tubes used to be)
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 03:59 PM
  #23  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
the manifold is one of turblown's earlier single wastegate manifolds, which were designed for higher boost, apparently.




elliot, thanks for the reply. i do get the feeling though that the boost will continue to shoot to infinity though, and not level off at ~17psi...

do your new design manifolds have the same turbo flange location as the one i have?

(attached pic is from previous owner)
The new dual wg manifolds are in the approximate same location, whether it's exact or not is hard to tell. I built that manifold you have now quite a long time ago I believe.


I highly doubt the boost pressure would go sky high as the engine is already past peak torque, and you have the smaller turbine a/r that will restrict the engine on the top end. You arent going to get more than another 1000rpms out of that a/r.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 05:22 PM
  #24  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by KNONFS
IF space allows it, why dont you cut the wastegate tubes off the primaries, and weld a wastegate flange on each exhaust runner? (where the wastegate tubes used to be)
this is what i would do, you could probably get by with dual 38's
Reply
Old May 14, 2013 | 05:30 PM
  #25  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i'm thinking this is a perfectly good manifold for someone who wants to run higher boost, as it's very high quality and well made (as is everything elliot makes, apparently), so i could sell it to someone who wants to make more power.
i'd hate to hack it up.

but i need to run low boost for track days. my FD is supposed to be a weekend/track car, so i need to keep the boost/heat down, especially with this small turbine housing.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.