Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

GT40R dyno chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-05, 08:27 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT40R dyno chart

Here's a dyno pull we did on one of our customer's car using the GT40R turbo with our manifold. The boost level with this pull is around 13.5psi (.95kg/cm2 on pfc and almost 1.0kg/cm2 on the boost gauge). The car was actually started to run lean (not as lean as it shows on the dyno) but it was starting to run lean so I let off at around 7krpm. We later find out the lean condition was caused by low on fuel while we were on the dyno (eventhough it shows 1/4 tank on the fuel gauge). We tuned the car up to 15psi on the street before dyno pulls and left it there until he does the dual pump setup before tuning for higher boost on race gas. We're expecting 500rwhp with this car at 20psi of boost. More dyno charts to come in the future

Here're the specs of the car

Gotham Stage 3 engine w/ balancing to 5 grams
Greddy 2 row I/C
Gotham GT40R turbo kit w/ single wastegate setup
midpipe w/ silencer
Blitz exhaust
ACT Extreme clutch w/ ACT flywheel
PFC
850cc/1600cc injectors
Defi link gauge system
HKS Twin Power
3 bar map sensor
MSD ignition wire
NGK racing plugs for leading


Last edited by pluto; 10-21-05 at 08:41 PM.
Old 10-21-05, 09:13 PM
  #2  
boxed in and drawn out

 
APEXL8T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bayouself
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve , I bought the single super pump from Gotham ....how much WHP will it handle? I changed from a cosmo and have designed everything for 500WHP around 20.
But you state his needs to go with two pump setup.
Thanks
Ito Port Motor
(2) 7 MSD &AL-2
780/1600 (Gotham)
TO4R
3.5 straight out
PFC
AERO FPR

Last edited by APEXL8T; 10-21-05 at 09:16 PM.
Old 10-21-05, 09:19 PM
  #3  
Weird Cat Man

 
Wargasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A pale blue dot
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Added this to my site...

http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/dyno.php

http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/graph.php?...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH
Old 10-21-05, 11:35 PM
  #4  
Chasing numbers

iTrader: (5)
 
sk8world's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Steve, What was the AR on the exhaust side?
Old 10-22-05, 09:49 AM
  #5  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Steve,

Is that with the .54 or .56 trim compressor wheel?

Tony
Old 10-22-05, 11:19 AM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not exactly sure of the reason for asking about the A/R or the trim. From memory, it was the .94 A/R? and a 64.xmm compressor wheel so i guess its a 56trim? It's bigger than my GR63 and smaller than my GR67 turbo

Last edited by pluto; 10-22-05 at 11:33 AM.
Old 10-22-05, 11:29 AM
  #7  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the pump we sell should be good to about 430rwhp, you can get more out of it 500rwhp by hard wiring the pump to a 12V battery and a better ground. Factory wiring isn't big enough to supply the current needed to support the hp level.




Originally Posted by APEXL8T
Steve , I bought the single super pump from Gotham ....how much WHP will it handle? I changed from a cosmo and have designed everything for 500WHP around 20.
But you state his needs to go with two pump setup.
Thanks
Ito Port Motor
(2) 7 MSD &AL-2
780/1600 (Gotham)
TO4R
3.5 straight out
PFC
AERO FPR
Old 10-22-05, 02:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
ghostrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: west palm beach, FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its amazing what a nice manifold will do with that turbo...
Old 10-22-05, 03:16 PM
  #9  
boxed in and drawn out

 
APEXL8T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bayouself
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pluto
the pump we sell should be good to about 430rwhp, you can get more out of it 500rwhp by hard wiring the pump to a 12V battery and a better ground. Factory wiring isn't big enough to supply the current needed to support the hp level.
Thats what Freddy and I did . Thanks Art
Old 10-23-05, 12:52 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
onefastrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve,

the dyno chart looks really good, but how far was the dyno afr from the actual afr?
It is dangerously lean...
Old 10-23-05, 11:37 AM
  #11  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pluto
I'm not exactly sure of the reason for asking about the A/R or the trim. From memory, it was the .94 A/R? and a 64.xmm compressor wheel so i guess its a 56trim? It's bigger than my GR63 and smaller than my GR67 turbo
There were a number of GT40R turbos (is your a true Garrett GT40R?) that had 56 trim wheels on it. These were the early versions I am told. The most recent ones have a 54 trim commpressor wheels on them. Garrett was surprised that I had a 56 trim on mine and went into a fit trying to figure out the history of the turbo when I had to replace the compressor wheel.

The real world seat of the pants difference is quicker spool-up on the slightly smaller compressor wheel. Measured by my pants and logged on my laptop, 300-400rpm quicker spool-up in 4th gear runs from 2500-7000rpm.
Old 10-23-05, 12:26 PM
  #12  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based on the wideband I was using, it did go as lean as 11.7:1 so I let off at 7krpm. mid-range was around 10.7:1 Their a/f was probably off by around 1.5 from looking at it.


Originally Posted by onefastrx7
Steve,

the dyno chart looks really good, but how far was the dyno afr from the actual afr?
It is dangerously lean...
Old 10-23-05, 12:30 PM
  #13  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good question, I'm not exactly sure what trim is what since I didn't measure the exducer but it was the new version of the GT40R since it was purchased recently. We did get 15psi by 3800rpm on the street in 4th gear, just didn't really show it on the dyno and logged.



Originally Posted by Asleep
There were a number of GT40R turbos (is your a true Garrett GT40R?) that had 56 trim wheels on it. These were the early versions I am told. The most recent ones have a 54 trim commpressor wheels on them. Garrett was surprised that I had a 56 trim on mine and went into a fit trying to figure out the history of the turbo when I had to replace the compressor wheel.

The real world seat of the pants difference is quicker spool-up on the slightly smaller compressor wheel. Measured by my pants and logged on my laptop, 300-400rpm quicker spool-up in 4th gear runs from 2500-7000rpm.
Old 10-28-05, 05:13 PM
  #14  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am seeing 22psi by 4400rpm in a 3rd gear pull.
Old 10-28-05, 06:14 PM
  #15  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's good to know Tony. Do you have any dyno charts for your car? I know that you tune the car yourself but wasn't sure if you have done any dyno pulls on it since I haven't seen one from you posted anywhere.

From the plots that i compared from using the GT40R

http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/graph.php?...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH

it looks like both zkeller and sk8world were getting 20psi at above 5000rpm. Is there something different that you did compared to the other two guys to gain an additional of 600rpm in spool up?

I know that rx7tt95 runs a non-ball bearing journal w/ the greddy manifold so he doesn't really count but I'm trying to figure out how you could spool 600rpm sooner than the other two guys (especially in 3rd gear).

It would help tremdously to see your dyno chart for comparison purposes.





Originally Posted by Asleep
I am seeing 22psi by 4400rpm in a 3rd gear pull.
Old 10-28-05, 07:21 PM
  #16  
boost > *

 
adictd2b00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: buffalo, ny
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kinda related.........how do you think the 1.06 a/r would be in comparison? would u see any noticable improvement up top ?
Old 10-29-05, 11:16 AM
  #17  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pluto
That's good to know Tony. Do you have any dyno charts for your car? I know that you tune the car yourself but wasn't sure if you have done any dyno pulls on it since I haven't seen one from you posted anywhere.

From the plots that i compared from using the GT40R

http://dyno.zeroglabs.com/graph.php?...1&SUBMIT=GRAPH

it looks like both zkeller and sk8world were getting 20psi at above 5000rpm. Is there something different that you did compared to the other two guys to gain an additional of 600rpm in spool up?

I know that rx7tt95 runs a non-ball bearing journal w/ the greddy manifold so he doesn't really count but I'm trying to figure out how you could spool 600rpm sooner than the other two guys (especially in 3rd gear).

It would help tremdously to see your dyno chart for comparison purposes.
Steve,

The same thing was happening to me (5000rpm for >20psi) with the 56 trim and unrestricted oil pressure at the wheel. The 54 trim (and oil restrictor) brought it down to sub 4600rpm. Timing/tuning changes gave me my best of 4438rpm on 94 octane. This data was gathered in 3rd gear. Since I did both changes (wheel and oil restrictor) together I state those together.

I've had so many "developmental" issues with the turbo and the manifold (now its a leak at Vband/DP and between the T4 flanges) that I have never felt it was "done" to dyno. Nothing bad intended towards Aspec and Sean. Most of the issues are ones related to being the first GT40r kit and Garret issues. I think this turbo will spin quicker with a tweaked manifold. Do you have any pics of your manifold? Need any comparison testing done with it?

All I have is my logs (FC-Edit and Innovate) to go my for predicting HP. I am running out intercooler and injectors. I am seeing a large spike in IAT above 16psi(Apexi FMIC) and maxxing out the injectors at 10.7 AFR at >6000rpm (2x1650, 2x860, Bosch '044, rocky steady pressure).

I need:
1) a Greddy 3-row FMIC
2) 2x1000cc top feed primaries
3) Fix the new leaks
4) time and money!

Then I am ready to spin the rollers. Data suggests I have hit close to my goals of >500 at <20.

Being an engineer keeps me tweaking the sucker and refusing to believe it could be done.

Tony
Old 10-29-05, 11:19 AM
  #18  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by adictd2b00st
kinda related.........how do you think the 1.06 a/r would be in comparison? would u see any noticable improvement up top ?
Not sure. I would estimate that it would have a such a negative effect on my ported engine that it really wouldn't make more up top.

Now on a bridge ported (maybe even half-B) engine I bet that sucker would ROCK!
Old 10-29-05, 11:44 AM
  #19  
boost > *

 
adictd2b00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: buffalo, ny
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm..... cause i'm in the process of ordering one for my car right now. mine is just a street port, so nothing crazy...... my engine builder tells me that precision now offers a whole bunch of different options for the gt40r and that i should look into going that route. Any suggestions?
Old 10-29-05, 03:31 PM
  #20  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by adictd2b00st
hmmm..... cause i'm in the process of ordering one for my car right now. mine is just a street port, so nothing crazy...... my engine builder tells me that precision now offers a whole bunch of different options for the gt40r and that i should look into going that route. Any suggestions?
If you can get me compressor and turbine maps for the wheel's that they are using I can tell you how it would compare to what I have right now. My porting is smaller than a race port. More like a street port.
Old 10-29-05, 03:49 PM
  #21  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
pluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tony,
You can see our manifolds here

http://www.gothamracing.com/catalog/...roducts_id=851

We already did the comparison test since the owner of the car had the GT40R turbo kit previously and didn't like the spool up and power potential. With the current setup, he was suprised with the night and day difference.



Originally Posted by Asleep
Steve,

The same thing was happening to me (5000rpm for >20psi) with the 56 trim and unrestricted oil pressure at the wheel. The 54 trim (and oil restrictor) brought it down to sub 4600rpm. Timing/tuning changes gave me my best of 4438rpm on 94 octane. This data was gathered in 3rd gear. Since I did both changes (wheel and oil restrictor) together I state those together.

I've had so many "developmental" issues with the turbo and the manifold (now its a leak at Vband/DP and between the T4 flanges) that I have never felt it was "done" to dyno. Nothing bad intended towards Aspec and Sean. Most of the issues are ones related to being the first GT40r kit and Garret issues. I think this turbo will spin quicker with a tweaked manifold. Do you have any pics of your manifold? Need any comparison testing done with it?

All I have is my logs (FC-Edit and Innovate) to go my for predicting HP. I am running out intercooler and injectors. I am seeing a large spike in IAT above 16psi(Apexi FMIC) and maxxing out the injectors at 10.7 AFR at >6000rpm (2x1650, 2x860, Bosch '044, rocky steady pressure).

I need:
1) a Greddy 3-row FMIC
2) 2x1000cc top feed primaries
3) Fix the new leaks
4) time and money!

Then I am ready to spin the rollers. Data suggests I have hit close to my goals of >500 at <20.

Being an engineer keeps me tweaking the sucker and refusing to believe it could be done.

Tony
Old 10-29-05, 06:03 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
ghostrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: west palm beach, FL
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asleep
Steve,


I've had so many "developmental" issues with the turbo and the manifold (now its a leak at Vband/DP and between the T4 flanges) that I have never felt it was "done" to dyno. Nothing bad intended towards Aspec and Sean. Most of the issues are ones related to being the first GT40r kit and Garret issues. I think this turbo will spin quicker with a tweaked manifold. Do you have any pics of your manifold? Need any comparison testing done with it?
Here I was thinking I was the only one with problems with that kit, leaking vbands, manifold was banana shaped. Had to get the manifold machined flat, and changed the vband to a 4 bolt...problem solved...
Old 10-29-05, 06:12 PM
  #23  
boost > *

 
adictd2b00st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: buffalo, ny
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asleep
If you can get me compressor and turbine maps for the wheel's that they are using I can tell you how it would compare to what I have right now. My porting is smaller than a race port. More like a street port.
thanks, i'll be sure to post up what info i can find
Old 10-29-05, 08:36 PM
  #24  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by pluto
Tony,
You can see our manifolds here

http://www.gothamracing.com/catalog/...roducts_id=851

We already did the comparison test since the owner of the car had the GT40R turbo kit previously and didn't like the spool up and power potential. With the current setup, he was suprised with the night and day difference.
Wow. Nice. Have any before and after numbers on the spool up? PM me a price for one with a T4 foot print and the single WG option, please. What is the I.D. of the piping?
Old 10-29-05, 09:58 PM
  #25  
Front Range Express

 
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Asleep
I've had so many "developmental" issues with the turbo and the manifold (now its a leak at Vband/DP and between the T4 flanges) that I have never felt it was "done" to dyno.

Being an engineer keeps me tweaking the sucker and refusing to believe it could be done.

Tony

Did you happen to catch this thread?:https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-rx-7s-23/v-band-flange-gasket-467421/

Order a sheet of this gasket material and get yer tweak on!


Quick Reply: GT40R dyno chart



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.