Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

GT-K series turbonetics turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #26  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by crispeed
I was refering to the 850 and 1000 turbos as having the S-trim turbine wheels.
Does anyone have the exact turbine wheel specs meaning the inducer/exducer dimensions.
P-trim is noted below as 2.54/2.92

The F1 is : 2.69/3.11

Both the turbines use a 10 blade design and have a slight pitch increase of about 5%. Also the blades are a thicker design for higher heat dissipation, but also for higher PR's associated with Rotary's,2JZ's and such. The comp wheels are now 354 grade and are HIP'd which is a much better casting process then being used by others.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 03:35 PM
  #27  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by Turbodriven
P-trim is noted below as 2.54/2.92

The F1 is : 2.69/3.11

Both the turbines use a 10 blade design and have a slight pitch increase of about 5%. Also the blades are a thicker design for higher heat dissipation, but also for higher PR's associated with Rotary's,2JZ's and such. The comp wheels are now 354 grade and are HIP'd which is a much better casting process then being used by others.
Ok
Thank you very much. The wheel is closer to a GT-Q wheel then.


From left to right. P, Q, GTQ.


This pic is a little misleading. From the pic it seems the inducer and exducer are the same size. The last time I saw that design it was from Innovative.

Last edited by crispeed; May 9, 2007 at 04:01 PM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #28  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA


I think that wheel is for a driver's side mounted turbo on a twin turbo application or a Ford 7.3l diesel.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 06:16 AM
  #29  
ErnieT's Avatar
Living life 9 seconds at a time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Don't know if this has been brought up, but the anti-surge housing will LOOSE up to 30rwhp. Just food for thought.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 06:23 AM
  #30  
allrotor93's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (126)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 3
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by ErnieT
Don't know if this has been brought up, but the anti-surge housing will LOOSE up to 30rwhp. Just food for thought.
thats what i heard from some supra guys. i wonder if there is a way to delete the anti surge???
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #31  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
Hokay, i tried to confirm turbodriven's specs but the sales manager says that they haven't released that info yet. "soon"

about the lost 30rwhp is that peak hp, or is that middle of the island?
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #32  
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
Original Gangster/Rotary!
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (213)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,807
Likes: 648
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by ErnieT
Don't know if this has been brought up, but the anti-surge housing will LOOSE up to 30rwhp. Just food for thought.
It's also supposed to hurt response a bit, which is why I opted against it on my 500R.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #33  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
If going by what only a couple of supra racers found or experienced vs the rest of the world that still run it then it's also safe to say that the design that Turbonetics and Garrett/HKS with the TO4Z have adopted should help a lot with the flow reversal problem that a regular anti-surge housing seem to exibit. The only way to find out is to actually test the theory. I can also claim that a lot of other people have discoverd the opposite to what was claim by the supra people most of which are real hardcore, dedicated racers that do a lot of R&D and don't have time to post on any forums but their results speak for themselves. But then again some people based their knowledge and claims on what they read on forums and not on what they have actually done or experienced hence the term bench racers, mechanics etc.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #34  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
Hokay, i tried to confirm turbodriven's specs but the sales manager says that they haven't released that info yet. "soon"

about the lost 30rwhp is that peak hp, or is that middle of the island?
I got the specs because I work at Forced Inductions and we have several hundred different turbos on the shelf, so I can be dangerous with a set of calipers....lol . If you need more info, give me a shout or shoot me a PM, we flow test all the units and have comparison flow #'s againist other manufacture turbos, but we don't post the info publicly.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #35  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by ErnieT
Don't know if this has been brought up, but the anti-surge housing will LOOSE up to 30rwhp. Just food for thought.
Depends on the application and Pressure ratio the turbo is running at. Some applications you may loose 10-20hp, and some you lose none. But what you do gain is driveability since by blocking some of the re-flow slots you can get surge. The re-flow is their to just broaden the map...it doesn't add any power capability to the wheel. Its mainly for diesel apps under heavy towing.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:06 AM
  #36  
allrotor93's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (126)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 3
From: Cary, NC
so do you like the turbo potential?

compared to a gt42r?

Originally Posted by Turbodriven
I got the specs because I work at Forced Inductions and we have several hundred different turbos on the shelf, so I can be dangerous with a set of calipers....lol . If you need more info, give me a shout or shoot me a PM, we flow test all the units and have comparison flow #'s againist other manufacture turbos, but we don't post the info publicly.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #37  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
if there is an advantage to all of turbonetics craziness with these turbos i'll be willing to drop the $$$ when i go single. I just want to know if a GT-K franken-turbo will match or better a gt35r w/ a ~.81 a/r.

I want 350rwhp in street trim and i want ~400hp in track trim. I want a nice curve with a long level peak. I want minimal lag and I don't want any boost drop off in the higher rev ranges.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #38  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by allrotor93
so do you like the turbo potential?

compared to a gt42r?

They are great turbos and packaging is MUCH easier then the GT42R. As for power, the GT42 still has the edge due to the larger more efficient turbine wheel. But as long as you don't have an exhaust backpressure issue they should be VERY close.


I will PM you the turbine flow eff % info, that will let you decide.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #39  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
if there is an advantage to all of turbonetics craziness with these turbos i'll be willing to drop the $$$ when i go single. I just want to know if a GT-K franken-turbo will match or better a gt35r w/ a ~.81 a/r.

I want 350rwhp in street trim and i want ~400hp in track trim. I want a nice curve with a long level peak. I want minimal lag and I don't want any boost drop off in the higher rev ranges.
The GTK will do all what you just posted, no questions about that. As for the pricing, well it all depends on what you want to spend.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #40  
allrotor93's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (126)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 3
From: Cary, NC
my biggest decision factors were fitment and warranty.

garretts are bigger and warranty sucks


Originally Posted by Turbodriven
They are great turbos and packaging is MUCH easier then the GT42R. As for power, the GT42 still has the edge due to the larger more efficient turbine wheel. But as long as you don't have an exhaust backpressure issue they should be VERY close.


I will PM you the turbine flow eff % info, that will let you decide.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #41  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by allrotor93
my biggest decision factors were fitment and warranty.

garretts are bigger and warranty sucks
Ahh, tnetics warranty is VERY nice indeed. Can't knock that one bit....
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #42  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by Turbodriven
Depends on the application and Pressure ratio the turbo is running at. Some applications you may loose 10-20hp, and some you lose none. But what you do gain is driveability since by blocking some of the re-flow slots you can get surge. The re-flow is their to just broaden the map...it doesn't add any power capability to the wheel. Its mainly for diesel apps under heavy towing.
Yeh.
Put a rotary in 5th gear with a big compressor wheel like a 76mm and part throttle it at very low rpms and see what happens when it starts to make boost.
Some applications drive the turbo straight into surge.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #43  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by crispeed
Yeh.
Put a rotary in 5th gear with a big compressor wheel like a 76mm and part throttle it at very low rpms and see what happens when it starts to make boost.
Some applications drive the turbo straight into surge.

Yes our supra customers and lots of our diesel customers that want them blocked off suffer from this.
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #44  
stevenoz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 635
Likes: 2
From: NC
The Q-trim has been replaced by the S-trim wheel. The F1 turbine wheel is the same for the gtks as the T-series. Specs are almost identical to the Q-trim, but its the taller tip height and design that is different. I already tuned a 408 T76 with the F1 S-trim wheel 1.30 on-center housing and it made good power ( 589 @ 10psi ) but still there were backpressure issues above 5500rpm as it really needed a T6 80+mm on it. Well just have to see how it does as I hope it adresses the backpressure issues that are really the only downside to the Turbonetics turbos.

The GTKs are non-configurable at the moment. The GTK-1000s are set up as .96 tangetial, non-divided, 4-inch vbands, dry cartridges. They will sell you a 1.32 or whatever turbine housing and weld in a 4-inch v-band separately though and you would have to just get it jet-coated if you wanted.


Here are the specs:

GTK-1000 T76 Q-trim ( no longer )

Compressor:
Inducer: 2.940 3.020
Exducer: 4.030 4.030


Turbine:
Inducer: 3.110 3.111
Exducer: 2.690 2.693
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #45  
stevenoz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 635
Likes: 2
From: NC
Picts


http://webpages.charter.net/94rx7/gtk/
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #46  
stevenoz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 635
Likes: 2
From: NC
Turbine exducer is supposed to be 2.693 not 2.690.

Here is a compressor map....
Attached Thumbnails GT-K series turbonetics turbo-dsc01959.jpg  
Reply
Old May 10, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #47  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by stevenoz
the backpressure issues are really the only downside to the Turbonetics turbos.
That have always been the problem with their turbos. They don't have enough turbine wheel to match any of their big compressors.
I was hoping to see this new line with something better on the turbine section especially since they siad it was a 'S-trim' for the turbine wheel.
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 03:28 AM
  #48  
pyro_racer_0016's Avatar
touge******
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, Missouri
i blew my engine and they warrantied my 62-1 and i had it back in a week no questions asked i said i might have put a foreign object through it they told me to send it in and even if i didn't they would test and rebuild it but they ended up giving me a totally new turbo not even a reman
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #49  
stevenoz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 635
Likes: 2
From: NC
Ya they always do that and that is why every RX-7 owner should use Turbonetics turbos. Who cares if you are down 20-30 hp to a Garrett of the same size when you can have a no questions asked warranty unlike Garrett. Throw an apex seal through it and trash the turbine wheel...no problem new turbo and usually less than 2 weeks. I bought a T76 for a customer one time and they sent the wrong trim wheel so instead of waiting to send it back and rebuild the turbo they had one built for me that day....made it a ball-bearing unit for free and overnighted it for free. Its amazing how flexible and great to work with they are.
Reply
Old May 16, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #50  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
I called Steve over at Turbonetics to find out about any franken-turbo gt-ks (to get better a/rs) but apparently you can't mix and match them yet. He did say that they were planning that for the future though.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.