fuel coolers
fuel coolers
anyone use one?
i am thinking about it... one like one of these. http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...rchType%3DBoth
or something like this. http://www.designengineering.com/cry..._fuel_bar.html
the reason being is that i feel that my set up is far from the *best* way to have the return routed (did it this way to get it done and over with quickly) but even after i have the return dump into the top of the tank, it is still going to be sent to the botom of the tank and heating up the fuel. i dont see what it would hurt by trying, but just wanted to ask the opinions of others about this topic. here is how i have the return set up right now. (its the one on the left)
i am thinking about it... one like one of these. http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...rchType%3DBoth
or something like this. http://www.designengineering.com/cry..._fuel_bar.html
the reason being is that i feel that my set up is far from the *best* way to have the return routed (did it this way to get it done and over with quickly) but even after i have the return dump into the top of the tank, it is still going to be sent to the botom of the tank and heating up the fuel. i dont see what it would hurt by trying, but just wanted to ask the opinions of others about this topic. here is how i have the return set up right now. (its the one on the left)
Re: fuel coolers
Originally posted by rxrotary2_7
(its the one on the left)
(its the one on the left)
it is the one on the right. (the other left.
) not that is matters. point is how close they are together.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by rxrotary2_7
care to share any logic behind this comment?
care to share any logic behind this comment?

i may be entirely wrong but i'll double check
i figured as much, but just thought i would ask because i have not seen any talk of it. the reason i *thought* it may be a good idea is because there is a fuel temp sensor, but was not sure what was actualy compensated when the temps rise. can anyone enlighten me?
thanks to everyone who replied.
thanks to everyone who replied.
Originally posted by vosko
if my logic is correct. moving a fluid a long distance at high speed should cool down the fluid enough.
if my logic is correct. moving a fluid a long distance at high speed should cool down the fluid enough.
I believe moving a fluid a long distance adds heat to the liquid, thus increasing its temperature. The heat would come from friction.
There is no reason why the liquid should lose energy when being moved.
Originally posted by Mr. Stock
If my logic is correct, your logic would be incorrect.
I believe moving a fluid a long distance adds heat to the liquid, thus increasing its temperature. The heat would come from friction.
There is no reason why the liquid should lose energy when being moved.
If my logic is correct, your logic would be incorrect.
I believe moving a fluid a long distance adds heat to the liquid, thus increasing its temperature. The heat would come from friction.
There is no reason why the liquid should lose energy when being moved.
Originally posted by Mr. Stock
If my logic is correct, your logic would be incorrect.
If my logic is correct, your logic would be incorrect.
but you are both right right in some respects. The large diameter lines may cool the fuel down some durring it's journeys because of the lower velocity but it depends on the heating source for the over all temp of the fuel. To make this easy why dont you just take a temp reading of the fuel after a long drive and take it from there? If it does seem to get warm I'd just put the pick up and the return on the opposite ends of the tank. The tank is also a fuel cooler, it has thin walls and a lot of air flow passing buy it. But to be honest I don't think your fuel would get hot unless your fuel pump is pumping 10gpm across the regulator next to your exhaust then back to the tank.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by rxrotary2_7
i figured as much, but just thought i would ask because i have not seen any talk of it. the reason i *thought* it may be a good idea is because there is a fuel temp sensor, but was not sure what was actualy compensated when the temps rise. can anyone enlighten me?
thanks to everyone who replied.
i figured as much, but just thought i would ask because i have not seen any talk of it. the reason i *thought* it may be a good idea is because there is a fuel temp sensor, but was not sure what was actualy compensated when the temps rise. can anyone enlighten me?
thanks to everyone who replied.
mike
Originally posted by setzep
The tank is also a fuel cooler, it has thin walls and a lot of air flow passing buy it.
The tank is also a fuel cooler, it has thin walls and a lot of air flow passing buy it.
i am going to change it latter to have an AN fitting mounted to the top plate of the tank and run a tube that would be welded onto the AN fitting to the other end of the tank...or atleast further forward than it is now.
If you have never looked at fuel temps during the summer it might be interesting. I recall 40+ degC after driving with 1/4-1/2 tank, filled tank and it dropped to high 20's low 30's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM







