DYNO'ED Today, 533whp @ 23 psi.
#76
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Poweraxel
Dave's GT35R car baselined @ A-Spec about 2 or 3 weeks ago 334RWHP@ 15psi on a Dynojet
so if it was tuned at 322 RWHP@ 15psi on a dyno dynamics.
theres only 12rwhp between the dynojet and the dyno dynamics. so its roughly 3-4% difference between the 2 dynos and this is after it was tuned.
so if it was tuned at 322 RWHP@ 15psi on a dyno dynamics.
theres only 12rwhp between the dynojet and the dyno dynamics. so its roughly 3-4% difference between the 2 dynos and this is after it was tuned.
#77
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
Huh??? I don't think I ever said it wouldn't make power? I said I don't remember tuning that car. Is that before or after the magical 20%.
Steve Kan is the man.
#78
Originally Posted by LUPE
That's after the proven 20% loss. Let the hating begin.....
Steve Kan is the man.
Steve Kan is the man.
#79
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason
Dyno Dynamics read almost identical to the Mustang Dyno. Thats around a 10% difference compared to the dynojet.
Jason
Jason
Like I said, Steve Kan is the man. He's tuned more cars than anyone in this thread and should know what #'s to expect. If he thought something was up, he would say it.
#80
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asleep
Me thinks someones baggie is sore from all the swinging and boasting going on.
#81
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In the Sky
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LUPE
That's after the proven 20% loss. Let the hating begin.....
Steve Kan is the man.
Steve Kan is the man.
YOU added the 20% correction factor to your #'s
as i stated before its been proven on Dave's runs on that Dyno Dynamics and the Dyno Jet that theres 3-4% difference even after it was tuned.
This is nothing personal between the you, Steve K, or anyone else just stating what was fact.
#82
Originally Posted by LUPE
Hey, I'll swing all day long. He's helped me like no other could.
Glad you are happy with it. But I'll raise that B.S. flag on the numbers being legit. Not hating....just based on facts. Be great to have some real data to back up your claim.
Gawd I feel like Carl now. If I take a shower Carl will it go away?
Good luck, Eric. It's great being able to drive a high HP single car let alone a FD as pretty as yours.
#83
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<--- me buster. im just telling what was seen on the dynojet. I could care less if you think "Steve Kan is the man" or is any better than anyone else.
Obrien, don't make me come bust you open, buster
20% was added because that's the percentage that's needed to make the hp number right. Have you used the Axis Racing Dyno Dynamics, dyno? If you have then you would know how low it reads.
There is plenty of hating and doubt in this thread, you Aspec guys always seem to bust everyones *****
It's not my fault that Kans a better tuner than you guys
Originally Posted by Poweraxel
huh... whats there to hate? what does Steve Kan have anything to what Sean said?
YOU added the 20% correction factor to your #'s
as i stated before its been proven on Dave's runs on that Dyno Dynamics and the Dyno Jet that theres 3-4% difference even after it was tuned.
This is nothing personal between the you, Steve K, or anyone else just stating what was fact.
YOU added the 20% correction factor to your #'s
as i stated before its been proven on Dave's runs on that Dyno Dynamics and the Dyno Jet that theres 3-4% difference even after it was tuned.
This is nothing personal between the you, Steve K, or anyone else just stating what was fact.
20% was added because that's the percentage that's needed to make the hp number right. Have you used the Axis Racing Dyno Dynamics, dyno? If you have then you would know how low it reads.
There is plenty of hating and doubt in this thread, you Aspec guys always seem to bust everyones *****
It's not my fault that Kans a better tuner than you guys
Last edited by Poweraxel; 08-22-05 at 06:57 PM.
#84
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asleep
Glad you are happy with it. But I'll raise that B.S. flag on the numbers being legit. Not hating....just based on facts. Be great to have some real data to back up your claim.
Gawd I feel like Carl now. If I take a shower Carl will it go away?
Good luck, Eric. It's great being able to drive a high HP single car let alone a FD as pretty as yours.
Gawd I feel like Carl now. If I take a shower Carl will it go away?
Good luck, Eric. It's great being able to drive a high HP single car let alone a FD as pretty as yours.
#86
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by Poweraxel
Dave's GT35R car baselined @ A-Spec about 2 or 3 weeks ago 334RWHP@ 15psi on a Dynojet
so if it was tuned at 322 RWHP@ 15psi on a dyno dynamics.
theres only 12rwhp between the dynojet and the dyno dynamics. so its roughly 3-4% difference between the 2 dynos and this is after it was tuned.
so if it was tuned at 322 RWHP@ 15psi on a dyno dynamics.
theres only 12rwhp between the dynojet and the dyno dynamics. so its roughly 3-4% difference between the 2 dynos and this is after it was tuned.
A-Spec dynoed my car on the low boost setting which was around 12.5-13pi
St. Louis dyno session was on 110 race gas.
The car has stock ports and a Racing Beat Dual Tip
I am attempting to set up a dyno session this week on a DynoJet to compare dyno numbers.
#87
Just in time to die
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by LUPE
There is plenty of hating and doubt in this thread, you Aspec guys always seem to bust everyones *****
Originally Posted by LUPE
It's not my fault that Kans a better tuner than you guys
#88
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
Oh please.... Yeah we bash on everyone. Here we'll play by the simple rules I was told we should play by, by someone else on this thread. Show me a corrected dyno sheet. Not one with 20% not one with settings switched, not one with Torque & HP meeting at some odd number Blah blah blah....... Simple. All I asked was, "Was it Dave's?" You went south with it.
Keep drinkin the Kool-aid it's good for yah!
Keep drinkin the Kool-aid it's good for yah!
#89
Mad Man
FWIW, I've dyno'd my car on a mustang, a Dynapack, and a Dynojet. The Dynojet, and the Dynapack were within a couple percent of each other, the mustang was ~7-8% lower, all at 20 psi, all SAE, the curves were essentially identical. Any dyno that has you enter load values(drag, parasitic loss etc) can be manipulated any way the operator likes, everyone here knows that, that is why a dynojet is nice, it is simple, and it prints the correction right on the page if one is used. Motorsport Dynamics 2 hours from here has a dynapack, I will see if any of my buddies have used it, and a dynojet. Bottom line, is happy customers, which Steve has many, the rest, well....
Asleep; Once you become a cynic there is no going back. On the plus side, my car,turbo, track performance and my numbers are all exactly as I predicted two years ago, so maybe there is something positive to having that mind set, just try not to take it out on others, and you'll be O'k
Asleep; Once you become a cynic there is no going back. On the plus side, my car,turbo, track performance and my numbers are all exactly as I predicted two years ago, so maybe there is something positive to having that mind set, just try not to take it out on others, and you'll be O'k
#90
Originally Posted by LUPE
You're calling BS to Steve Kan too
Hey, I can understand, you get excited about the car, want to share and a bunch of pundits starting challenging you with numbers, calculations, and physics.
What matters is that you are loving you car and that is why we are all on this board.
Edit: Good advice, Carl.
#91
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FYI, when I was trapping 122mph with ET Streets, my dyno last year read 318 whp on that dyno. This was before the dyno started reading a little lower.
Last edited by LUPE; 08-22-05 at 07:06 PM.
#93
Originally Posted by LUPE
X .20 = 533
Like I said, this has been tested on numerous cars. It comes dead on 20%.
Be proud of what you did, "444 on XYZ dyno and I believe it could be 533 on a dynojet!"
Stick to the facts and let the rest of us apply the correction factors.
#94
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh, you forgot to mentioned that those numbers marked (for rpm) is not set for rx7. It was actually set for wrx's. I don't want people thinking that we get full boost at 4500rpm. :P
X .20 = 533
Like I said, this has been tested on numerous cars. It comes dead on 20%.
Originally Posted by LUPE
X .20 = 533
Like I said, this has been tested on numerous cars. It comes dead on 20%.
#95
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Belleville, IL
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pluto
oh, you forgot to mentioned that those numbers marked (for rpm) is not set for rx7. It was actually set for wrx's. I don't want people thinking that we get full boost at 4500rpm. :P
#97
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: fort worth, tx, usa
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it was me honestly, I would be more happy bragging about trapping 122mph @318rwhp instead of making 533rwhp and runs 13's. j/k eric
It's funny how all these # game works. If I said I was only making 200rwhp and trap 100mph in the 1/4. people would say BS. either the track was wrong or I'm making more hp than I claimed.
but when it comes down to dyno #'s, people are just the opposite.
go figure?
It's funny how all these # game works. If I said I was only making 200rwhp and trap 100mph in the 1/4. people would say BS. either the track was wrong or I'm making more hp than I claimed.
but when it comes down to dyno #'s, people are just the opposite.
go figure?
Originally Posted by Asleep
Why don't you change the name of the thread (and the 3 others you started) to state simply the facts with no fudge factors, estimated correction factors? Just state the dyno, and what it COULD read on a dynojet and move on, brother.
Be proud of what you did, "444 on XYZ dyno and I believe it could be 533 on a dynojet!"
Stick to the facts and let the rest of us apply the correction factors.
Be proud of what you did, "444 on XYZ dyno and I believe it could be 533 on a dynojet!"
Stick to the facts and let the rest of us apply the correction factors.
#98
Just in time to die
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by books
Just to clarify few things..
A-Spec dynoed my car on the low boost setting which was around 12.5-13pi
St. Louis dyno session was on 110 race gas.
The car has stock ports and a Racing Beat Dual Tip
I am attempting to set up a dyno session this week on a DynoJet to compare dyno numbers.
A-Spec dynoed my car on the low boost setting which was around 12.5-13pi
St. Louis dyno session was on 110 race gas.
The car has stock ports and a Racing Beat Dual Tip
I am attempting to set up a dyno session this week on a DynoJet to compare dyno numbers.
Yes please do, as that is all I was curious about as well.
#99
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not really sure about this, just asking a question, but could it be reading low due to it being an AWD dyno? Lupe mentioned this was done on an AWD dyno, and Steve mentioned it was setup for WRX's.
-Alex
-Alex