Crispeed Powered - 685 RWHP FD!! - Dyno Inside. The return of "V8 Killer"
06-01-06, 10:18 PM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
You're not a hater, you're a moron. That dyno sheet is *probably* representative of the way the car accelerates. He made over 400 rwhp from 5600 rpm to 9000 rpm! Amazing.
Andrew
06-01-06, 10:22 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LUPE
So, you're giving someone grief for having too much HP? 
That didn't take long.
That didn't take long.
Andrew
06-01-06, 10:25 PM
#29
Originally Posted by andrewb70
Careful who you call a moron. You’re the one that is using vague terms like "probably". My point is that having high HP doesn't necessarily translate into a good ET. So if having high HP doesn't make you go quicker at the track, then the whole concept is mute. It just becomes a number. I never knocked the number, just its practical application in the rear racing world.
Andrew
Andrew
Only other thing I can think of would be the drivers ability to control that power.... well.. that and weight =P
I am just curious... I always thought
High HP + Low Weight (assuming power can be put to the ground) + Good Driver = good ET
Not tryint to be a dick.. just curious to hear your opinion.
Sure, 700hp with a dumbass driving is going to equate to some crapass times. But then again... if that car doesn't pull at least 135mph in the trap, i dunno what the hell the problem is. Oh.. were we talking 1/4 mile or the 'other' track.
eh.. nice power regardless.
06-01-06, 10:25 PM
#30
...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: md
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewb70
Not giving grief for having too much HP. My point is that making good numbers on the dyno and putting that power to good use are two different things. I think you know that more than most people on this board.
Andrew
Andrew
Just out of curiosity, how much power have you made on your RX7 on the dyno and what have you run et/mph wise?
NM, I just saw your page of your Goat with the 502 bb and richmond 6 speed where you pulled a 13 flat and a 2.2 60 ft time.
Last edited by BLitzed33; 06-01-06 at 10:28 PM.
06-01-06, 10:39 PM
#31
First off thanks everyone for the positive comments.
The two above dyno sheets are not actually the best or smothest ones but only represent the highest peak #'s for bragging rights
Actually the car made 654 rwhp at 30 psi and 589 at 27 psi. The two dyno graphs above were at 32 and 34psi but it took some rigging of the boost controller and wastegate to get the boost up at that level. The boost was never steady above 30 psi and on the 34 psi run the boost dropped back to 32 psi as can be seen on the dyno graph.
From the looks of it, if it did hold the boost to redline it should have been around 700rwhp or better but that's just guessing.
The only major difference from the older setup that would have a major effect on the power would be the intake manifold.
At the same boost level as before power increased by 54rwhp.
I'm going to elaborate further with pics on the intake. The intake is comprised of an Excessive Motorsports lower and custom upper.
The motor is also running on NRS ceramic seals now and it's still getting stronger day by day as with ceramic seals they take some time to fully break in.
More dyno sheets, pics and a video comming soon.
The two above dyno sheets are not actually the best or smothest ones but only represent the highest peak #'s for bragging rights
Actually the car made 654 rwhp at 30 psi and 589 at 27 psi. The two dyno graphs above were at 32 and 34psi but it took some rigging of the boost controller and wastegate to get the boost up at that level. The boost was never steady above 30 psi and on the 34 psi run the boost dropped back to 32 psi as can be seen on the dyno graph.
From the looks of it, if it did hold the boost to redline it should have been around 700rwhp or better but that's just guessing.
The only major difference from the older setup that would have a major effect on the power would be the intake manifold.
At the same boost level as before power increased by 54rwhp.
I'm going to elaborate further with pics on the intake. The intake is comprised of an Excessive Motorsports lower and custom upper.
The motor is also running on NRS ceramic seals now and it's still getting stronger day by day as with ceramic seals they take some time to fully break in.
More dyno sheets, pics and a video comming soon.
06-01-06, 10:42 PM
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLitzed33
Just out of curiosity, how much power have you made on your RX7 on the dyno and what have you run et/mph wise?
NM, I just saw your page of your Goat with the 502 bb and richmond 6 speed where you pulled a 13 flat and a 2.2 60 ft time.
NM, I just saw your page of your Goat with the 502 bb and richmond 6 speed where you pulled a 13 flat and a 2.2 60 ft time.
http://www.carcraft.com/eventcoverag...se/index6.html
My RX7 has run a best of 11.21 @ 121.96 with 360 RWHP.
http://www.speakeasy.org/~andrewb/rx7/rx7_11_21.wmv
Andrew
06-01-06, 10:59 PM
#33
Originally Posted by vipers
lol..when you tape a silver dollar to your glove box door, and tell all your passengers that they can have it if they can get it...then floor it..... thats fun!
06-01-06, 11:06 PM
#35
Originally Posted by andrewb70
Not giving grief for having too much HP. My point is that making good numbers on the dyno and putting that power to good use are two different things. I think you know that more than most people on this board.
Andrew
Andrew
06-01-06, 11:14 PM
#36
...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: md
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by andrewb70
My GTO has run a best of 12.15 with a race weight of 4200 pounds.
http://www.carcraft.com/eventcoverag...se/index6.html
My RX7 has run a best of 11.21 @ 121.96 with 360 RWHP.
http://www.speakeasy.org/~andrewb/rx7/rx7_11_21.wmv
Andrew
http://www.carcraft.com/eventcoverag...se/index6.html
My RX7 has run a best of 11.21 @ 121.96 with 360 RWHP.
http://www.speakeasy.org/~andrewb/rx7/rx7_11_21.wmv
Andrew
06-01-06, 11:16 PM
#37
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Beautiful work. Another monster 7 down in Florida! Great job Crispeed. It's no wonder more and more people are getting you to tune their cars. Too bad you live on the other coast. 
I'll be looking forward to seeing the video of this car as well as the pictures of what's "hiding" under the hood.
I'll be looking forward to seeing the video of this car as well as the pictures of what's "hiding" under the hood.
06-01-06, 11:19 PM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLitzed33
your rx7 mph and et is really good considering there are people with almost 100 more whp making around 125 trap speeds, i take it you are getting good traction with that et as well. Good driving there.
Andrew
06-01-06, 11:22 PM
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by crispeed
Lupe should know but I know for proven fact what it takes to run good et's or make a very fast car on street rubber. Have done it many times before and that's not my keyboard talking out loud.
Andrew
06-01-06, 11:25 PM
#41
Big Daddy!!!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love seeing high horsepower rotorys out there. Eat your heart out supra's!!! It will take a 1000rwhp supra to keep up with you unless the supra is on a diet. Congrats!!!
R.K.
R.K.
06-02-06, 02:03 AM
#45
Originally Posted by RX794
Impressive, do you know what the SAE corrected #'s are?
Conditions on the last couple of runs were at 94deg F. with 21% humidity.
Air intake temp on the last run was around 112 to 114deg F. at the beginning of the run and 120 to 124deg F. at the end of the run.
Last edited by crispeed; 06-02-06 at 02:16 AM.
06-02-06, 09:09 AM
#50
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by andrewb70
Careful who you call a moron. You’re the one that is using vague terms like "probably". My point is that having high HP doesn't necessarily translate into a good ET. So if having high HP doesn't make you go quicker at the track, then the whole concept is mute. It just becomes a number. I never knocked the number, just its practical application in the rear racing world.
Andrew
Andrew
