Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Compressor Map Analysis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 03:53 AM
  #1  
Bathrone's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Compressor Map Analysis

Tried posting this on my own countries board but didnt get any real insights from posts. See what you blokes think.

1. Calculate engine CFM

CFM = (L x RPM x VE x PR) / 5660

(assume 85% VE @ max rpm)
(assume displacement of 13BT rotary engine displacement x2)
= (2.616 X 7500 X 85 X 2) / 5660
= 3335400 / 5660
= 589.3

2. Convert CFM to LB/MIN

LB/MIN = CFM x 0.0756

(no ideal gas law)
= 44.5 lb/min

3. Verify no surging

Confirm no surge 50% airflow

(assume max boost by 50% rpm)
= 44.5 x 0.5
= 22.3 lb/min

Confirm no surge 20% airflow

= 44.5 x 0.2
= 8.9lb/min



A freind of mine helped me with the figures for VE and displacement of the 13BT.

Seems the T66 is a good compressor for a pressure ratio of 2 but is there a problem with surge at higher altitudes with the thinner air?

Someone advise me if I have this wrong please.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 726
From: Florence, Alabama
an interesting post....

i match my turbos using the following formula and it has worked really well.

1.92 cfm = 1 rwhp

for example, a 450 rwhp 13b requires 864 cfm or 59.7 lbs per minute. the map of a t66 shows 72 lbs/minute max which would produce 1041 cfm and 542 rwhp.

44.5 lbs/min 644 cfm (10lbs/min = 144.17 cfm) by my figures would make 335 rwhp

i did not derive the formula but have found it to work well.

howard coleman
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #3  
books's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 46
From: St. Louis
I am curious where the 85% VE was derived from.

I thought I had read that rotaries were lower, but don't remember where I had read that.

Again...just curious
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
Let's also keep in mind that at wide open throttle, your normally aspirated VE may be say... 85% but at 20% throttle at the same RPM, do you really think your VE is that good with the pumping losses from the mostly closed throttle? No, so the actual VE will be a lot lower.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 06:12 PM
  #5  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
I made a spreadsheet to easily play around with graphing on the maps like you did there... pretty handy...

but in the end, guess what matters? If it works!

Honestly on a frequently-modded car like the RX-7, it makes more sense to look at actual dyno results from other people... and then you can get an idea of what works. Doing the math of it is good too, and it might give you an idea of what to try next... "hmm if turbo A works well, and I do the math there... and then I look at Mystery Turbo B and it has a little better map... that might be worth a try...."

So all the calculating in the world is great, but don't forget to look at actual dynos to see what works and what doesn't.

B
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
He's On Toroids
NE RX-7 Forum
48
Oct 19, 2015 08:58 PM
spokanerxdude
Megasquirt Forum
3
Oct 6, 2015 12:28 PM
killerrx710
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
Sep 28, 2015 09:13 AM
killerrx710
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Sep 24, 2015 10:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.