Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Catch can, inform me.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
FD3S-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Geby
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Catch can, inform me.

How do you properly install a non vented catch can, to a 93 fd, with a single turbo.
I've searched and came up with PCV elimination threads, and most threads talk about vented catch cans.



Now is this correct then?

Blue like to top nipple on oil neck.

Red line to nipple on the UIM (where the pcv used to be)


Thanks for help.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 12:20 AM
  #2  
Smitter's Avatar
94 Single Turbo FD
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
is that your car in the pic? its missing a clamp on the upper rad hose(if u didnt already know)
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 12:52 AM
  #3  
AzEKnightz's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 8
From: California, SF
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Smitter
is that your car in the pic? its missing a clamp on the upper rad hose(if u didnt already know)
Good eyes =)
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 02:13 AM
  #4  
FD3S-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Geby
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Yeah that's my car, and thanks i do know about the clamp missing, also missing the TB, and spark plug wires belts, and the catch can itself


BTW: smitter thanks for the idler pulley i. dimension.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 06:16 AM
  #5  
allrotor93's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (126)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 3
From: Cary, NC
i am curious too....i have one of the bobo cans off ebay

i rean one hose to the can and one hose from the can to the subframe. i was just trying to keep it off my block
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:17 AM
  #6  
fd_neal's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
if you do it the was described in the OP you will pressurize the crankcase with boost. That routing will only work if the PCV valve is left in line.

If i were to run a non vented catch can i would run oil filter neck -> catch can -> pre turbo inlet. When doing it this way you need to fill the can with something to act as a demister.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
^ exactly. The PCV valve pulls crankcase vapors under low load using vacuum, then closes under high load so that the crankcase can push the vapors out using internal pressure:

Attached Thumbnails Catch can, inform me.-pcv_fd.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #8  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
I don't see why you're not going to have a vent in the top. Releasing the pressure and not blowing out your oil pan gasket was the main reason to having a catch can.

Oh and you're missing the lower line from the radiator that runs to the filler neck
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
he wants to vent it back to the intake like it was from the factory. see "passage 2" in the diagram I posted.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 12:18 PM
  #10  
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
500+hp club
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 4
From: .
just running a line from the filler neck to a catch can or just straight atmosphere is better than anything the whole idea is to make sure the crank case can release the pressure so it does no build up a pcv valve does not have to be in the picture. have ran any boosted motors with a hose to the ground with no problems ever
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #11  
mono4lamar's Avatar
In the burnout box...
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 2
From: New York
Originally Posted by arghx
he wants to vent it back to the intake like it was from the factory. see "passage 2" in the diagram I posted.
AHHH so he wants to coat the intake track with oil at high boost... Why not just do it right?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #12  
FD3S-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Geby
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by mono4lamar
I don't see why you're not going to have a vent in the top. Releasing the pressure and not blowing out your oil pan gasket was the main reason to having a catch can.

Oh and you're missing the lower line from the radiator that runs to the filler neck
Thanks. I've eliminated my Ast. So that will be capped off.

Can some one make up a simplified pic.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #13  
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
500+hp club
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 4
From: .
ok so i have a catch can it has two fittings one inlet and one outlet. well all you need is one line preferably the highest point on the filler neck taping the cap is the best and then take that line and put it to a vented catch can so it catches the oil and moisture
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #14  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Originally Posted by mono4lamar
AHHH so he wants to coat the intake track with oil at high boost... Why not just do it right?
It'll survive. Every turbo car I know of recirculates the PCV from the factory, and some people don't want to have to deal with a catch can filling up in a road racing situation. I run a vented catch can, but I have an FC which has less of a problem of puking oil out than the FD. Presumably that's because it has a crankcase vent on the middle iron as well, and I'm sure my oil pan baffle doesn't hurt.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #15  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
so if we dont have a pre turbo source of vac we should just hook one line to the oil filler neck and the other open?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 02:55 AM
  #16  
silverfdturbo6port's Avatar
500+hp club
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,211
Likes: 4
From: .
if you have ideas post them. i have seen many ways i have seen one line hooked to the filler neck to the catch can and the other line pre turbo to catch can so it vacumes the pressure out but that causes a problem in a hard right turn as the passage can get blocked off and wont vent so another way is to run a line from filler neck to catch can well that solves the venting for hard left turns but to fix the hard right turns you need a line coming off the other side of the block like the rear turbo drain to the catch can again thats what i have seen and worked and any other suggestions help. DReg100 you have any ideas?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 01:40 PM
  #17  
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
wannaspeed.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 5
From: Texas
I've found running as large of a line directly off the top of the filler cap helps a lot with oil being pushed out of the oil filler neck. The problem is the oil gets pushed up into the hose (even worse on long corners) and the only way for the crankcase pressure to escape is to push the oil out too. With a larger hose it takes more oil to create a blockage and the crankcase fumes will follow the path of least resistance and go around the oil. This is the same idea with running a second vent from the rear turbo drain if available, and other places people have tapped lines into.

The problem is most catch cans have a particular size nipple coming out of them and your limited to that size unless you make your own or modify one.

I run my catch can vented. Hose comes from top of oil cap into catch can and vents to atmosphere.

Options for non vented would be: just like stock with the pcv valve and catch can in between. The advantage is your still getting rid of any fumes, but your not burning the oil and other crap that the catch can grabs. Disadvantage is: if the pcv fails you have pressure buildup in your crankcase, and you have an extra hose to run/deal with during UIM removal.

You shouldn't run this type of system without the PCV because you would then have direct boost pressure going from the UIM to the catch can and back into the oil pan.

You could also run the catch can like stock with the PCV AND a filter on the catch can. You wont get a vacuum in the crankcase, but it should suck most of the fumes out of the catch can. If the PCV fails you still have a vent.

Another option is to run the catch can with a line going to the front of the turbo, this will create a vacuum without requiring a PCV.

There are many other variants and additional options with additional vent lines. but this covers the main ideas.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #18  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
ON my FC I just have a vented can hooked up as follows:

Oil filler capped tapped with a 90* brass fitting. Line from there to one fitting on the can.
Vent on the middle iron runs to the other fitting on the can.

Don't get any ACTUAL oil in the can unless you're beating the **** out of the car on hard right hand corners. If you just drive around, or beat it up in a straight line, it gathers a little bit of milky/oily moisture.

Works great IMO.

You can see most of the important stuff here.


I believe one key to making it work well is to have no major up hill sections in the lines. My line that runs to the middle iron currently goes over my water pump (new setup....) but that may change if the catch can's functionality is less now then before.
Attached Thumbnails Catch can, inform me.-engine-005.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #19  
FD3S-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Geby
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by Dudemaaanownsanrx7
I've found running as large of a line directly off the top of the filler cap helps a lot with oil being pushed out of the oil filler neck. The problem is the oil gets pushed up into the hose (even worse on long corners) and the only way for the crankcase pressure to escape is to push the oil out too. With a larger hose it takes more oil to create a blockage and the crankcase fumes will follow the path of least resistance and go around the oil. This is the same idea with running a second vent from the rear turbo drain if available, and other places people have tapped lines into.

The problem is most catch cans have a particular size nipple coming out of them and your limited to that size unless you make your own or modify one.

I run my catch can vented. Hose comes from top of oil cap into catch can and vents to atmosphere.

Options for non vented would be: just like stock with the pcv valve and catch can in between. The advantage is your still getting rid of any fumes, but your not burning the oil and other crap that the catch can grabs. Disadvantage is: if the pcv fails you have pressure buildup in your crankcase, and you have an extra hose to run/deal with during UIM removal.

You shouldn't run this type of system without the PCV because you would then have direct boost pressure going from the UIM to the catch can and back into the oil pan.

You could also run the catch can like stock with the PCV AND a filter on the catch can. You wont get a vacuum in the crankcase, but it should suck most of the fumes out of the catch can. If the PCV fails you still have a vent.

Another option is to run the catch can with a line going to the front of the turbo, this will create a vacuum without requiring a PCV.

There are many other variants and additional options with additional vent lines. but this covers the main ideas.
what do i do with the extra nipple on the filler neck? cap it? what if i put a filter on there?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #20  
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
wannaspeed.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 5
From: Texas
I have both my nipples capped on my filler neck.

If you put a filter on there oil will probably start seeping from it. You could cap the bottom nipple and use the top nipple and see how it works for you (without tapping the filler cap). If you get excess oil coming out of it, you can either use a second vent at the rear turbo drain, or tap into some of the other spots people use, or drill the filler cap out and use a 90* brass fitting. The larger the better IMO

If you want to add a filter it would be best to add it on the catch can. At which point you can decide whether you want to run it back to the PCV system/front of turbo, or just leave it vented at the can..
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 06:01 PM
  #21  
AlexG13B's Avatar
brap brap brap
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 44
From: Florida
Originally Posted by classicauto
ON my FC I just have a vented can hooked up as follows:

Oil filler capped tapped with a 90* brass fitting. Line from there to one fitting on the can.
Vent on the middle iron runs to the other fitting on the can.

Don't get any ACTUAL oil in the can unless you're beating the **** out of the car on hard right hand corners. If you just drive around, or beat it up in a straight line, it gathers a little bit of milky/oily moisture.

Works great IMO.

You can see most of the important stuff here.


I believe one key to making it work well is to have no major up hill sections in the lines. My line that runs to the middle iron currently goes over my water pump (new setup....) but that may change if the catch can's functionality is less now then before.

i had mines the same way (except i used the hole on the filler neck). but i changed it to leaving the middle iron with a hose running underneath car now. idk y ha




btw where/how is ur intake ran?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #22  
Busted7's Avatar
Will work for horsepower
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 1
From: Springfield, MO
I pipe one line into a check valve downstream from the turbo and get a venture effect when the exhaust is flowing, and i added a vented catch can on the top of the oil cap and it vacumns but does not put oil in the overflow!
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #23  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 46
From: Michigan
Air / Oil Separator Design

I have a catch can on my 13B-RE that collects blow-by from the oil fill tube via a 3/8" line. After running the car hard, the can sometimes fills with oil and eventually overflows. I haven't put the car on a road course with the turbo engine yet, but that is a goal once the bugs are all worked out.

I did some research on air / oil separators, and the general aviation community offers some that are installed on the firewall. The idea is to separate the oil from the other vapors and allow it to return to the sump via a check valve. The check valve is there to avoid high pressure crankcase gasses from pushing oil back up the drain tube.

I vent the output to a K&N style breather that will hang below the car to minimize underhood oil and associated fire risk.

I welcome any comments.
Attached Thumbnails Catch can, inform me.-crankcase-ventilation.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:39 AM
  #24  
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
wannaspeed.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 5
From: Texas
if vented correctly the only thing in the can will be blow by. If you haven't been racing the car on a track you shouldn't be seeing oil in your can like that.

How does the separator remove the oil from the gasses anyways?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 04:36 AM
  #25  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
Moar Info I'm tired of the oil in my intake!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.