Bw366
#1
FAST BATTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bw366
Hi All, I wonder if anyone can help with info on these turbos, great price for a start,
we intend running the 366 with the .91 divided on a REW 13b FD circuit race car, 4/1600cc & 2/880cc, would ideally like to see 500-520RW/HP @ around 18-22psi, anyone have info on spool speed.
We will run E85 or 98 with water injection (rice racing system).
We have heard these are similar in size to the TO4Z, with a better exhaust housing material that wont melt etc.
Any info at all would be greatly appreicated.
we intend running the 366 with the .91 divided on a REW 13b FD circuit race car, 4/1600cc & 2/880cc, would ideally like to see 500-520RW/HP @ around 18-22psi, anyone have info on spool speed.
We will run E85 or 98 with water injection (rice racing system).
We have heard these are similar in size to the TO4Z, with a better exhaust housing material that wont melt etc.
Any info at all would be greatly appreicated.
#2
Bubblicious DEF.
iTrader: (36)
this probably wont help but..
i have the s366 with a hbp and it spools pretty fast. ( i barely drive my car since its always down for more upgrades so i cant really remember the details lol)
i did do a pull with my friend with a gt35 non bb turbo and down low i was neck and neck with him so im assuming it spools fairly similar to a gt35 but then again i had a hbp and hes stock? ported. we were both at 14psi w/ water meth yada yada..
i dont think you'll be disapointed in the bw. i love that turbo and its cheappp
i have the s366 with a hbp and it spools pretty fast. ( i barely drive my car since its always down for more upgrades so i cant really remember the details lol)
i did do a pull with my friend with a gt35 non bb turbo and down low i was neck and neck with him so im assuming it spools fairly similar to a gt35 but then again i had a hbp and hes stock? ported. we were both at 14psi w/ water meth yada yada..
i dont think you'll be disapointed in the bw. i love that turbo and its cheappp
#3
It wasn't me!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey bubbles, am I wrong to think that even though you have a HB, it shouldn't have any relevance on the low end part of the rpm but on the top end instead... actually doesn't your power-band shift slightly higher, hence lower rpm power suffers?
If this is true, then it shouldn't matter whether your HB and your friend is stock, when it comes to spool up, only when making more power...
correct me if Im wrong please..
If this is true, then it shouldn't matter whether your HB and your friend is stock, when it comes to spool up, only when making more power...
correct me if Im wrong please..
#4
Bubblicious DEF.
iTrader: (36)
indian, i have no idea lol. iirc, i should be losing power down low. but now that i think of it, im running the same set up on a stock ported motor and i have no low end in 5th vs with the hbp it actually moved. so taking that into consideration idk. which that may not even be relevant lol....
the thing that sucks about the winter is im so detatched from cars, come spring and summer i have to relearn everything about my damn car haha
the thing that sucks about the winter is im so detatched from cars, come spring and summer i have to relearn everything about my damn car haha
Trending Topics
#10
4th string e-armchair QB
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not necessarily true. A later closing edge will shift the powerband up in the RPM, but earlier opening increases VE (read: power) pretty much everywhere in the RPM range, unless you open too early in a full PP.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Someone should build bridgeport or semi-pp engine, with stock closing of intake ports. Low end and midrange would be killer
#13
In the burnout box...
iTrader: (32)
We've done both a semi PP with stock porting and a semi PP with a well engineered streetport to both the primaries and secondaries. No results and I hate bringing it up cause everyone will want to know the variance of the two setups. I have a good idea what the results will be though
#14
4th string e-armchair QB
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Bay, Ontario
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll leave this one alone cause I've seen improvements and I've seen power loss as-well. There was too many different variables and tuners involved so I can't really put down porting the leading edge of the intake ports. My opinion is to not overport. A turbo will make much more power than a port will. Compression is something you can't get back once you port the closing edge.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agree. For street car, with resonable quiet exhaust system, with demand for fuel economy, and for most bandwagoned turbochargers, stock port is best
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts