Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

BW S475 on 13b-re

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
West-se's Avatar
Thread Starter
bcrotary.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
BW S475 on 13b-re

Wondering how this turbo will run with my 13B-RE extended street port. The car is street legal but setup for drag racing with the mods necessary to hit 600+. I am wondering if the porting on my motor will work with this turbo or if the turbo is overkill. I've seen people running this turbo are half or full bridge. I am not concerned how it drives on the street but more so on the track. I am shooting for 10 sec or better.

specs on the turbo are

Turbocharger Name - S475
Compressor Wheel Inducer - 75mm
Turbine Wheel Inducer - 96
Turbine Wheel Trim - 96
Turbine Wheel Part # - 410100-3
Turbine Option - Outlet - V-Band
Turbine Option - Inlet - T6
Turbine Option - A/R - 1.32
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #2  
skir2222's Avatar
I win
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Nothing 2 step can't do yes?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 02:44 AM
  #3  
ZAN_TUNING's Avatar
Just turn up the boost!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: HELL
i've said it a lot lately, this is my favorite turbo as of late. Make your life easier, there are now Two companies i know of that machine the turbine and utilize T4 housings. they still have the ETT and spool up like a gt42R but are capable of a tad bit more power at half the cost!!!!

Dave @ Majestic turbo's and Mike Turbo Inc. have the custom T4 versions of this turbo. if your serious then go this route... the T6 is un-neccessary for your goals!!!

if you only want to run 10's tho.. you could do that on a muuuch smaller setup
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #4  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Yeah good units indeed. The guys in my sig below do engineering for BW units. They have the T4's with 3 different turbine wheels in them now, also the T6's and now the new high flow .98A/R race compressor covers as well. Also the ball bearing prototypes are done, and they look good.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
West-se's Avatar
Thread Starter
bcrotary.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Thanks for the info guys, the main reason I was looking at this turbo was cost, however the need to fabricate a T6 mani will pretty much eat up any savings that would had. The T4 looks like it may be the way to go, right now my goals are 10 seconds I don't want to set the bar too high, but on the other hand I don't want to have to buy another turbo and at the same time, don't want to buy a turbo that is not going to work my my setup. I drive the car to the track so it still needs to be driveable but im not looking for a turbo that has good street qualities, I want something thats going to fully spool by 5k and make 30 psi + of boost to 9k with my engine.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #6  
Doc Holiday's Avatar
Needs more cow bell
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 833
Likes: 4
From: Reno, NV
A RX3 owner on this board went 11.2 with one on EIGHT psi. Probably overkill for 10's. But, if your anything like me, you embrace overkill.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #7  
zbrown's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: scranton nd
i agree they are great units... i spent 1000 on my 42 and a buddy spent 650 on a new 475

his is on a 6 liter truck motor in a grand national

his BW sounds amazing compared to the gt42...... almost annoying
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #8  
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
*** Bless The USA
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis / Illinois
This car runs a off the shelf S475.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DArzD6ymMNg
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 03:41 AM
  #9  
infinit1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
check out www.twinsturbo.com they are a distrubutor for borg warner/bullseye turbo
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
Twins Turbo Motorsports's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Peoples Republik of Kaliforniastan
if you are interested here is a picture of the BW S380's
80mm comp with a T6 compressor cover with T4 turbine. we have 2 turbine wheel options as of now and working on a few more with bullseye power.

S380 w/ 1.10 A/R


87mm turbine



S380 vs S366 for scale



S380 vs hefeweizen..again for scale......




Eric
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #11  
Twins Turbo Motorsports's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Peoples Republik of Kaliforniastan
forgot to mention on a piston engine should produce between 550- 1300 HP.
and sorry but I don't have a Compressor chart to share as of now.
Also, look at that frost coming off that Heff......MMMM beeer.....
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #12  
IPT's Avatar
IPT
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: A Cornfield in IOWA
The BW S475 is a KILLER 13B turbo.

The box unit with the T6 turbine housing will fully spool before 5k rpms. It will start to see positive manifold pressure in the 3.5k rpms range. The will out perform a GT42 for less than half the price.

Now throw on some custom combos like the S480 or some smaller turbine housings and they will rock your WORLD!!!!

The one thing that Borg warner turbos have is a TON of options for turbine wheels. As most of you know you can't hardly have a big enough turbine wheel on a rotary.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 11:35 AM
  #13  
West-se's Avatar
Thread Starter
bcrotary.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Agreed, finding a T6 flange manifold is another story. The only option I see right now is either fabricating one or modifying a T4. The s475 is a cheap option for big power, but the manifold will eat up any savings that may be had with the cheap turbo. As soon as you get into S370 or bigger series the prices are more in line with the garret turbo's so I really have to look at the maps to decide which option to take, I like the s375,s378,s380 but they are in the GT42R price range.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #14  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by Intense_Motorsports
i've said it a lot lately, this is my favorite turbo as of late. Make your life easier, there are now Two companies i know of that machine the turbine and utilize T4 housings. they still have the ETT and spool up like a gt42R but are capable of a tad bit more power at half the cost!!!!

Dave @ Majestic turbo's and Mike Turbo Inc. have the custom T4 versions of this turbo. if your serious then go this route... the T6 is un-neccessary for your goals!!!

if you only want to run 10's tho.. you could do that on a muuuch smaller setup
half the price and still BB or not? if its not BB then how does is spool like a 42R?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #15  
West-se's Avatar
Thread Starter
bcrotary.com
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
non bb, and that is a great question, I'd love to know how it spools like a 42R without the BB. The S475 is 1/4 the price of a 42R 1/2 the price of a GT42. Maybe its being compared to a GT42 and not the GT42R ?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 01:26 AM
  #16  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
I tend to lean towards the they don't "outspool" a BB unit with a nonBB unit camp. You will be told how the wheels have better aerodynamics and it is because of the extended tip wheels that they will outspool a BB unit. You will also be told that what oil pressure you run through the unit can effect how it spools. Too much pressure will increase drag etc. While there is truth to those statements and the S400's do rock on 13B's some of BW's sales reps are being just a bit misleading. Just a small example of what I have had told to my customers is that a S366 is a GT35R destroyer that it will out perform the 35R. That it is the way to go. My customers question was to get a honest comparison from a BW rep. about what they offer that is comparable to the 35R. That is what he was told. So how honest a comparison is it? It's not, and anyone who knows turbos would know it's not. A 66mm inducer versus 61mm for starters as well as a 10mm difference in exducer as well. 92.7mm versus 82mm We wont even mention T4 versus T3. It's not even close. A S300 62mm would be the better comparison. I have had testing on S400's ran side by side with 42R's on big truck apps. Same truck swapped turbo. The powerband was nice with the S400 it made power in some areas better than the 42R. But it did not "outspool" it. The 42R had better transient response and was quicker on boost. Now maybe if we wanted to run water for oil it would have been a different story. But that is what was observed with same motor same setup different turbo.

Please before anyone wants to post about me bashing BW units I am not, I think they are great performers. I SELL THEM AS WELL. I think they offer much broader selection of wheels to play with and can get a more "perfect fit" if you will. I even think they have slightly better compressor aerodynamics. I just think there are too many people(BW reps) running around saying extended tip BW units outspool BB GT units. And between me and my main supplier (who has done more testing than anyone on this board) we have yet to see it on many different apps. when actually comparing as close to apples to apples as you can. Now slapping extended tip wheels on BB CHRA's is a great thing indeed and I know a few who have accomplished it. Personally I like the S400 with the 72mm comp. and 95mm turbine. Seen good stuff done with that if memory serves although the 87mm turbine might be a better solution dimensionally. I also would say run the T6 if you can. I have had great success with T6 manifolds running 2" diameter primaries.

Last edited by Zero R; Aug 26, 2007 at 01:36 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #17  
IPT's Avatar
IPT
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: A Cornfield in IOWA
Originally Posted by West-se
Agreed, finding a T6 flange manifold is another story. The only option I see right now is either fabricating one or modifying a T4. The s475 is a cheap option for big power, but the manifold will eat up any savings that may be had with the cheap turbo. As soon as you get into S370 or bigger series the prices are more in line with the garret turbo's so I really have to look at the maps to decide which option to take, I like the s375,s378,s380 but they are in the GT42R price range.
The BW units have just dropped in price. There is a new turbine housing that was just released (taken over a year to get them going.) There are three differenct a/r's .90, 1.10, 1.25. They are almost exactly the same as the GT42R turbine housing, so for the most part they will be drop ins for any setup for the GT42.

There is only one choice for the turbine wheel though. They only fit the 83mm turbine wheel right now.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 09:15 AM
  #18  
IPT's Avatar
IPT
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: A Cornfield in IOWA
Originally Posted by Zero R
Just a small example of what I have had told to my customers is that a S366 is a GT35R destroyer that it will out perform the 35R. That it is the way to go. My customers question was to get a honest comparison from a BW rep. about what they offer that is comparable to the 35R. That is what he was told. So how honest a comparison is it? It's not, and anyone who knows turbos would know it's not. A 66mm inducer versus 61mm for starters as well as a 10mm difference in exducer as well. 92.7mm versus 82mm We wont even mention T4 versus T3. It's not even close. A S300 62mm would be the better comparison.

I agree on the S362 compared to the GT35R. I know some one tha had a GT35R on an SRT4 and then switched to the S366. IT did not work out. Too laggy compared to the GT35R. He switched it out for the S362 and it all came back. The BW unit spooled within 200rpms of the GT35R, but the BW unit held boost (40psi) all the way to the 8k rpm redline where the GT35R's boost would drop off. This allowed the car to make more power at redline. (I can't remember how much I will see if I can get the dyno)

The GT35R had an .82 a/r undivided turbine housing and the S362 had a .85 divided. This was on a cast log style undivided manifold.

The BW had 18degree cooler intake temps compared to the GT35R.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #19  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
Originally Posted by IPT
There is only one choice for the turbine wheel though. They only fit the 83mm turbine wheel right now.
Wonder how much meat is on the housing?? They may only want to fit the 83 on there


I like the wheel of the 62mm S300 we've been playing around with fitting them on the BB units. I think they tend to flow a bit better.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #20  
EQUISIETE's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
I got mine for 600 bucks, spent like 50 bucks on tubing for the manifold, 60 on flanges and came up with this...

Name:  08-19-07_2132.jpg
Views: 1213
Size:  43.5 KB

Name:  08-19-07_2128.jpg
Views: 1291
Size:  41.8 KB

Its for a 12A turbo alcohol setup, my boy has this same setup but on a 13B turbo alcohol and ran 8.30 on a good tune, its better than paying 1500 bucks for a gt42R and it'll yield the same power if not more.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 08:08 PM
  #21  
IPT's Avatar
IPT
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: A Cornfield in IOWA
Originally Posted by Zero R
Wonder how much meat is on the housing?? They may only want to fit the 83 on there


I am sure they can be punched out for larger turbine wheels, but they are coming in all ready cut for the 83mm wheel, because this setup was meant for the SFWD NHRA class which as far as I know you can only run an 83mm turbine wheel.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #22  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by Zero R
Wonder how much meat is on the housing?? They may only want to fit the 83 on there

The guys I deal with can go alot larger then 83mm. They have an 85, 87, 89 and 90mm turbine wheel option now. Plus they also have a new race cover that is .96A/R versus those smaller .63 and .66A/R covers that are posted. They are gaining 100hp at peak power.

Last edited by Turbodriven; Aug 28, 2007 at 10:41 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #23  
Zero R's Avatar
Just in time to die
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 2
From: look behind you
I 've run the .96 A/r comp here on a 13B, I like it.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 01:22 PM
  #24  
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
*** Bless The USA
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis / Illinois
Originally Posted by Zero R
I 've run the .96 A/r comp here on a 13B, I like it.
would you happen to have any dyno graphs or dyno #'s you can share from the "stock" s475/t6 turbo ?

I looked around but haven't been able to find any.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #25  
Turbodriven's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by Zero R
I 've run the .96 A/r comp here on a 13B, I like it.
Cool. Are you buying them from forcedinductions.com?? The covers are made in-house but I know several dealers are now buying them. I am thinking about trying one on my setup.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.