Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Is a bw s366 good choice for only looking to make 400-450 rwhp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-16, 08:48 PM
  #1  
FDPAPI

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Erosangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 145
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Is a bw s366 good choice for only looking to make 400-450 rwhp?

I want to hear some opinions on the s366 for only 400-450 rwhp. The set up will be a divided set up with dual gates and the s366 is the newest SXE model with the efr billet wheel.
Is this turbo too big for my goals?
Old 08-31-16, 09:06 PM
  #2  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
I'd say if you plan to top out at 450 rwhp it's a needlessly large compressor---- consider stepping down one size smaller. Also, the billet wheel isn't 100% necessary IMO at the PR's needed to make that kind of power. With a well-built engine and a 35R-sized compressor (61.4mm inducer) you can hit your goals on pump gas w/water-meth boost levels (sub 20ish)
Old 08-31-16, 09:13 PM
  #3  
FDPAPI

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Erosangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 145
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
I'd say if you plan to top out at 450 rwhp it's a needlessly large compressor---- consider stepping down one size smaller. Also, the billet wheel isn't 100% necessary IMO at the PR's needed to make that kind of power. With a well-built engine and a 35R-sized compressor (61.4mm inducer) you can hit your goals on pump gas w/water-meth boost levels (sub 20ish)
I want to stay with the borg worner turbos...so would you think an s362 would be a better choice or a s360?
Old 08-31-16, 09:29 PM
  #4  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,525
Received 538 Likes on 325 Posts
Originally Posted by Erosangel
I want to stay with the borg worner turbos...so would you think an s362 would be a better choice or a s360?
One of my best buds made 480 rwhp at 20 psi with an s362, I think that's a great option for what you're looking to do
Old 08-31-16, 10:24 PM
  #5  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
I would go with an s362sxe. It has the wheel technology of the EFR series at a much cheaper price. There is no reason to go with a s366 for your power goals. All you will get is increased lag. I can build you a whole kit or just sell the turbo. http://www.irperformance.com/shop/pr...gle-turbo-kit/

Last edited by IRPerformance; 08-31-16 at 10:27 PM.
Old 08-31-16, 10:42 PM
  #6  
Adaptronic Distributor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 7,066
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
S360sxe for sure. Still will make 550 if you ever want to crank it way up.
Old 08-31-16, 10:57 PM
  #7  
FDPAPI

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Erosangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 145
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I would go with an s362sxe. It has the wheel technology of the EFR series at a much cheaper price. There is no reason to go with a s366 for your power goals. All you will get is increased lag. I can build you a whole kit or just sell the turbo. http://www.irperformance.com/shop/pr...gle-turbo-kit/
I would love to do that but the only problem is i have already ordered the s366sxe. I have to see about returning it now
Old 09-02-16, 06:07 PM
  #8  
2SoonJr

iTrader: (8)
 
FD7KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OrangeCounty-Santa Ana
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I went with the regular S362 (88-75) with 3" v band and matching it with Glease long runner manifold, im still in the process to building my engine but I hope it will spool up nicely with the nice square street port I got from Renown.
Old 09-06-16, 12:10 AM
  #9  
Spooling

iTrader: (7)
 
Nateness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My setup made 455 WHP on 91 octane with a mild street port using the BW S300 SXE with 62mm compressor wheel and a 0.91 AR divided T4 exhaust housing. Makes ~20 PSI by about 4,000 RPMs.

Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I would go with an s362sxe. It has the wheel technology of the EFR series at a much cheaper price. There is no reason to go with a s366 for your power goals. All you will get is increased lag. I can build you a whole kit or just sell the turbo. IRP Borg Warner S360/362/366/SXE Single Turbo Kit | IRPerformance
Old 09-06-16, 08:55 AM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Another member just posed dyno results from one of IRP's build with an S360. 530 @ 22 PSI.

https://www.rx7club.com/build-thread...built-1091557/
Old 09-06-16, 10:04 AM
  #11  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Yup I was about to say We did 462 Mustang/531 Dynojet whp at 22 lbs last Friday. The S360 turbo is more than enough for your power goals and has excellent spool for a journal bearing turbo. People think bigger is better but most people running turbos like the S366 aren't even in their efficiency range.
Old 09-06-16, 06:16 PM
  #12  
2SoonJr

iTrader: (8)
 
FD7KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OrangeCounty-Santa Ana
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
Yup I was about to say We did 462 Mustang/531 Dynojet whp at 22 lbs last Friday. The S360 turbo is more than enough for your power goals and has excellent spool for a journal bearing turbo. People think bigger is better but most people running turbos like the S366 aren't even in their efficiency range.
well I think that's due to what set of rotors one is running; from what I gathered boosting anything beyond 1 bar of BOOST on high compression FD rotors (light weight thin walled) has a higher chance of imploding on the faces.

while having a set of low compression S4 turbo II rotors ( heavy weight thick walled ) can take it all the way to 2 bars of BOOST no problem.

Last edited by FD7KiD; 09-06-16 at 06:39 PM.
Old 09-06-16, 08:03 PM
  #13  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by FD7KiD
well I think that's due to what set of rotors one is running; from what I gathered boosting anything beyond 1 bar of BOOST on high compression FD rotors (light weight thin walled) has a higher chance of imploding on the faces.

while having a set of low compression S4 turbo II rotors ( heavy weight thick walled ) can take it all the way to 2 bars of BOOST no problem.
Not necessarily true. Its all in the tuning. For most applications I recommend the FD 9:1 rotors. No reason to go lower compression unless you plan to run 30psi+.
Old 09-07-16, 07:34 AM
  #14  
B O R I C U A

iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Nateness
My setup made 455 WHP on 91 octane with a mild street port using the BW S300 SXE with 62mm compressor wheel and a 0.91 AR divided T4 exhaust housing. Makes ~20 PSI by about 4,000 RPMs.
At what PSI did it make 455 whp?

Originally Posted by IRPerformance
Yup I was about to say We did 462 Mustang/531 Dynojet whp at 22 lbs last Friday. The S360 turbo is more than enough for your power goals and has excellent spool for a journal bearing turbo. People think bigger is better but most people running turbos like the S366 aren't even in their efficiency range.
I thought that BW was not producing the S360, for the price that those turbos were going last year, they were hard to beat!

From your experience, what's the spool difference between a S360 and a GT35r?
Old 09-07-16, 09:11 AM
  #15  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
I sell S360 turbos all the time. 300-500 rpm spool difference between a s360 and 35r depending on porting and turbine housing sizing.
Old 09-07-16, 11:07 AM
  #16  
2SoonJr

iTrader: (8)
 
FD7KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OrangeCounty-Santa Ana
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I sell S360 turbos all the time. 300-500 rpm spool difference between a s360 and 35r depending on porting and turbine housing sizing.
I think most of us here are at least on a Mild Street port and to get the power band somewhat in the "sweet spot" a .91 A/R housing is the best way to go; but then again that all depends on your choice of
"extra curricular activities" you plan to do
Old 09-07-16, 12:52 PM
  #17  
B O R I C U A

iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I sell S360 turbos all the time. 300-500 rpm spool difference between a s360 and 35r depending on porting and turbine housing sizing.
500rpm is not bad at all!

Was under the impression that BW stopped making them. Now I know who to call when I am ready for one!!!
Old 09-07-16, 06:49 PM
  #18  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by KNONFS
500rpm is not bad at all!

Was under the impression that BW stopped making them. Now I know who to call when I am ready for one!!!
I can still get them, but eventally they will be superceded by the SXE version. IMO there is no reason to not get the SXE. The billet wheel and other technology from the EFR series are a big improvement. AN S300SXE will make more power with better spool all other things being equal than a S300.
Old 09-08-16, 06:42 AM
  #19  
B O R I C U A

iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I can still get them, but eventally they will be superceded by the SXE version. IMO there is no reason to not get the SXE. The billet wheel and other technology from the EFR series are a big improvement. AN S300SXE will make more power with better spool all other things being equal than a S300.
Agree, but I will have to bump up to a 62mm, which I am guessing that will spool even slower than the S360. Maybe not?
Old 09-08-16, 10:24 AM
  #20  
2SoonJr

iTrader: (8)
 
FD7KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OrangeCounty-Santa Ana
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by IRPerformance
I can still get them, but eventally they will be superceded by the SXE version. IMO there is no reason to not get the SXE. The billet wheel and other technology from the EFR series are a big improvement. AN S300SXE will make more power with better spool all other things being equal than a S300.
well, I don't now about more power or better spool after reading this from Borg Warner themselves. I say just stick with the regular s300 series and call it a day; but if you have an extra $300-500 to spend then why not. to each their own.

Cast vs Billet Compressor Wheels for Turbochargers Results

"BW AirWerks - In general... yes, we can make anything if you want to pay for it In the performance and/or racing world though, there is really no benefit to using a "billet" CW other than it's shinny. Basically, billet, or FMW (Forged Milled Wheel) compressors came about due to OE applications requiring them. When a turbo is constantly being cycled from high speed to low speed, the wheel becomes fatigued and can eventually lead to a hub burst (CW splits in half). Imagine the compressor acting like a big drag slick like you see on top fuel cars; during the burnout, you can see them get skinny and "grow" in height... On a much smaller scale, the CW sees this same process over and over again, and over time this weakens the wheel, eventually leading to a fracture and possibly a hub burst.

Now ask your self how many times you've seen a race car's CW split in half... I have never, and I've seen a LOT of failures. Even the billet aluminum isn't enough in some newer applications and we've turned to titanium which in its FMW form, is nearly indestructible. I've heard all the propaganda surrounding the billet wheel myths: higher boost capability, higher flow, higher efficiency, etc... The higher boost capability is the only one which is true, but not because it's machined and not true for racing use. OE diesel applications using FMW compressors can run higher boost pressures more reliably simply because they are less susceptible to fatigue as they're cycled from higher speeds (required to make more pressure) to low speeds.

So, why would anyone offer a billet wheel to the racing/performance market? Couple/three reasons:
  • - Some people just want them because they look really nice... and are willing to pay the cost difference.
  • - Because it already exists in an OE production application and it's easily installed into performance turbos, sometimes they're even interchangeable with existing cast wheels.
  • - Applications where a cast wheel does not exist (maybe a larger inducer is needed) or production volumes are believed to never be high enough to justify tooling costs. Are they cheaper than cast wheels? ...NO. Even in high production volumes, a billet wheel will always be more expensive than a cast wheel. However, if a company wants to make a compressor all their own (not using an existing "big" turbo manufacture's wheel ie. BW, Garrett, Holset) it would most likely be cheaper as they would have to tool up to make all the cast versions. If a company makes a mistake in the design of a billet wheel, they can simply keep changing the program until they get something that works... The OE manufacturer does all the development work up front to arrive at the best possible design for what's needed. Once the design is finalized, a "master wheel" is machined and used for the tooling master... that's right, all cast wheels get their start from a very nice billet wheel that when tooling is made, creates the same exact performance characteristics in a much cheaper and faster to produce cast version.

Phew... Sorry for the long-winded explanation, but hopefully this helps explain why billet wheels exist. Short version is billet wheels are no better than cast wheels for any performance or racing application I'm aware of... but they sure do look great!”

Last edited by FD7KiD; 09-08-16 at 10:28 AM.
Old 09-09-16, 07:14 AM
  #21  
B O R I C U A

iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by FD7KiD
well, I don't now about more power or better spool after reading this from Borg Warner themselves. I say just stick with the regular s300 series and call it a day; but if you have an extra $300-500 to spend then why not. to each their own.

Cast vs Billet Compressor Wheels for Turbochargers Results
Thought there was some weight advantages between the cast and billet wheels (assuming same wheel size)
Old 09-09-16, 08:17 AM
  #22  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 989 Likes on 745 Posts
I though extended tip turbos flow a lot more for the same size. Either that or borgwarner and garrett are making up lies and so are all the dynos around the world.
Old 09-09-16, 08:39 AM
  #23  
My job is to blow **** up

iTrader: (8)
 
lastphaseofthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: palmyra Indiana
Posts: 2,900
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FD7KiD
well, I don't now about more power or better spool after reading this from Borg Warner themselves. I say just stick with the regular s300 series and call it a day; but if you have an extra $300-500 to spend then why not. to each their own.
[/url]
YOU can get the s300SXE or "s362" as the fanboys renamed them.. for $640+150 for the turbine housing. the old s300 turbos go for about that or a 100 less.

they're all called s300 sxe. the 62mm is the smallest. I call it the 8374... because i read it uses the same wheel as the EFR 8374, it just loses the *****, the IWG, and the built in diverter valve..and the TI gamme turbine material. correct me if im wrong.

what i am getting is is the S300SXE series is the NEW s300 series of cheap but awesome turbos and you should defiantly be replacing old blown out s300sx3 and older turbos with these new units.
Old 09-09-16, 09:22 AM
  #24  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
I'm putting together a car right now that originally had a S300 S360. Customer is upgrading to a S362 SXE. I'll post results when I finish the car.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 09-09-16 at 10:24 AM.
Old 09-09-16, 10:36 AM
  #25  
#FakeCarEnthusaist

iTrader: (10)
 
Brody8877's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,814
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by KNONFS
Thought there was some weight advantages between the cast and billet wheels (assuming same wheel size)
Originally Posted by WANKfactor
I though extended tip turbos flow a lot more for the same size. Either that or borgwarner and garrett are making up lies and so are all the dynos around the world.
Originally Posted by lastphaseofthis
YOU can get the s300SXE or "s362" as the fanboys renamed them.. for $640+150 for the turbine housing. the old s300 turbos go for about that or a 100 less.

they're all called s300 sxe. the 62mm is the smallest. I call it the 8374... because i read it uses the same wheel as the EFR 8374, it just loses the *****, the IWG, and the built in diverter valve..and the TI gamme turbine material. correct me if im wrong.

what i am getting is is the S300SXE series is the NEW s300 series of cheap but awesome turbos and you should defiantly be replacing old blown out s300sx3 and older turbos with these new units.

Lets' compare the compressor map between the standards airwerks S300sx3 62/63 and the SXE 62





BW S300SX3 62/63 Compressor map






BW S300SXE 62 Compressor map


I will let you guys decide if there is a difference or it is some kind of gimmick.


Quick Reply: Is a bw s366 good choice for only looking to make 400-450 rwhp?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.