Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Borg Warner EFR Manifold Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2015 | 08:09 AM
  #1  
Ernstudet22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 9
From: Indiana
Borg Warner EFR Manifold Build

I recently purchased a BW 8374 EFR from Elliot at turbo source. Super nice person. However I didn't purchase the manifold. I decided to try my hand at it. I have all the necessary machines/equipment to make this thing so I had no excuse not to try it. I started by hanging the turbo from threaded rod and positioning it. I used 1/2" stainless for the flanges and 1-1/2" schedule 10 elbows in 304 stainless. I bought the divided T4 flange but had to make the engine flange. Once I had the turbo hanging and both flanges in place I welded 2 pieces of flat stock between the flanges so as to maintain their position in relation to each other. Once that was done the rest was fitting and welding the pipe in between. I would like to Thank Elliot for the work he invested in the design of this style of manifold. Mine is just a close copy of his based on any pics I could find.
Attached Thumbnails Borg Warner EFR Manifold Build-2015-01-31-16.49.37.jpg   Borg Warner EFR Manifold Build-2015-02-07-14.52.10.jpg   Borg Warner EFR Manifold Build-2015-02-07-20.17.37.jpg   Borg Warner EFR Manifold Build-2015-02-07-20.18.31.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2015 | 04:25 PM
  #2  
Vicoor's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 434
Likes: 16
From: Manassas
Looks good, how much war page did you end up with on the flanges?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2015 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
Ernstudet22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 9
From: Indiana
I had to face .033 off the engine flange and .070 off the T4 flange to make them flat again.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2015 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
erick31876's Avatar
turbo or bust
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
From: bristol,pa
Nice manifold
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 12:51 AM
  #5  
rx72c's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 195
From: Australia
Is this going to be running an internal wastegate with 1.5 inch runners?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 05:52 AM
  #6  
Ernstudet22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 9
From: Indiana
Yes the runners are 1.5" pipe schedule 10 which has a 1.682" ID. And yes to the IWG.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 09:18 AM
  #7  
jetlude's Avatar
BadAss DoItYourselfer
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 870
Likes: 4
From: Paradise
How much boost are you planning to run?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2015 | 09:01 PM
  #8  
Ernstudet22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 9
From: Indiana
I would like to make 450 rwhp on a conservative dyno. I hope I don't have to push past low to mid 20's to get there.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 11:14 AM
  #9  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
One of our dealers made 400rwhp at 10 psi on our iwg 8374 kit( raceport engine however ).
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 06:53 PM
  #10  
silverTRD's Avatar
Time or Money, Pick one
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 169
From: Torrance, ca.
why only 1.5" runners? are ports are closer to 2" in diameter. Or does it taper down to 1.5? if so, why?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 07:00 AM
  #11  
jetlude's Avatar
BadAss DoItYourselfer
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 870
Likes: 4
From: Paradise
Lets hope you don't run into boost control issues using the 1.5 runners.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 07:30 AM
  #12  
Shainiac's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 50
From: Lyme, CT
Nominal pipe dimensions are different than tubing.
SCH10 1.5" PIPE is actually 1.9" OD and 1.7" ID.
2.0" 11 gauge TUBING is 2" OD and .120" wall thickness ~1.76" ID.
Not a huge difference.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 12:52 PM
  #13  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
We have been using 1.5 schedule 10 pipe in our IWG kits for quite some time now. Every owner has report 10 to 13psi base( and lowest) boost pressure on the dyno and street. 1.5" pipe I.D is the EXACT size of a T4 divided flange.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 02:15 PM
  #14  
rx72c's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 195
From: Australia
You should move to Australia. Hard to find quality fabricators down here(who actually want to work).
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 11:04 PM
  #15  
dguy's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 332
From: sb
Originally Posted by rx72c
You should move to Australia. Hard to find quality fabricators down here(who actually want to work).
Wat? He wanted to try to build his own manifold. Mission accomplished.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2015 | 01:52 PM
  #16  
jojodotcom's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 390
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver
I believe rx72c is complimenting Ernstudet22's fabrication skills~ and suggested that he should move to Australia to start a business.

Nice work btw!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2015 | 06:11 PM
  #17  
dguy's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 332
From: sb
Originally Posted by jojodotcom
I believe rx72c is complimenting Ernstudet22's fabrication skills~ and suggested that he should move to Australia to start a business.

Nice work btw!
Haha, I reread the response, my apologies rx72c!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2015 | 07:33 PM
  #18  
diesel dakota's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 162
Likes: 5
From: Alberta Canada
Thought I would jump into this thread as I did the same thing.
I used Schedule 40 1.5" 304SS piping.

I didn't get the piping to match up to the t4 flange as closely as I would have liked so I laid a lot of weld around the flanges so that I could make a very smooth internal flow path. the downside is that it looks a lot worse and it warped the flanges quite a bit. but after having it machined flat the warpage is fixed. the manifold will be more or less invisible on the car anyways.
This is also my first time tg welding stainless as I only picked up the welder 4 months ago and I've spent all my time with aluminum. I'm confident in the strength but the welds are by no means pretty lol.


Made a jig after I decided how the turbo should fit.
Name:  0FEE05A0-537E-4D0A-8F64-7556B5C9FF6C_zpskv01pkar.jpg
Views: 154
Size:  120.3 KB
Name:  BBCA18E4-8499-4B81-A5A3-965E1B1B9D1B_zpsz3xfilcl.jpg
Views: 154
Size:  82.5 KB
Name:  E9D43683-7697-468A-BD8A-033EA8A2CAB0_zps6zms19wh.jpg
Views: 161
Size:  88.1 KB
Name:  A4E1D5EA-5B26-4521-A976-0E3912A25BA2_zpsvfltqcpg.jpg
Views: 160
Size:  83.6 KB

The problem with buying a engine flange is that they are meant for larger piping.
Name:  9B43AF79-E5E3-4C7A-B814-831A49685343_zpszycamcas.jpg
Views: 169
Size:  167.3 KB

Name:  BC40951C-A65B-402E-B990-709982200165_zpsjblztzzu.jpg
Views: 160
Size:  78.7 KB

Name:  E3F08C72-8AD5-4C69-9235-924381CC05CB_zpsxruvpghg.jpg
Views: 148
Size:  287.8 KB

Name:  80C6A32C-1F3B-4FC9-8895-8A01064EB093_zps9e9hqj2r.jpg
Views: 205
Size:  199.4 KB
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Oct 14, 2015 12:31 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.