BNR turbos: Is this the end for single set up?
#1
Sleeper
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Dallas
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BNR turbos: Is this the end for single set up?
I have a HKS TO4E single turbo with a street port and that is what I wanted. Simplicity, less heat and clean up the clutter under the hood(Rats nest). Again, I was not after big Dyno numbers but an upgrade with better tuning capabilities and slight increase in performance.
Now I am reading SOOOOOO much about the BNR set up that sounds to good to be true.
What is your opinion on the BNR vs. the Single set up?
Are the BNR going to kill the single conversions?
Do you think people will go for less expense and keep the complexity?
What does the future holds for the single turbo people?
Now I am reading SOOOOOO much about the BNR set up that sounds to good to be true.
What is your opinion on the BNR vs. the Single set up?
Are the BNR going to kill the single conversions?
Do you think people will go for less expense and keep the complexity?
What does the future holds for the single turbo people?
#2
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bannished
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: BNR turbos: Is this the end for single set up?
You'll always have people running singles. I doubt less than 1% of the people running singles (happy or not) will swap to stock manifold twins. Even it they are upgraded "super duper secret sauce" twins.
I bet that about 5-10% due goto twins, but something like the HKS or the new Aspec unit.
The advantage to having a sub $2000 set of upgraded twins is that people now have more choices for their upgrade paths. It used to be that if you wanted to make 420-450RWHP (over a long period of time, not just once or twice or until you blew the turbos out) you had to go with a single. Now, that MAY be different.
Tony K.
I bet that about 5-10% due goto twins, but something like the HKS or the new Aspec unit.
The advantage to having a sub $2000 set of upgraded twins is that people now have more choices for their upgrade paths. It used to be that if you wanted to make 420-450RWHP (over a long period of time, not just once or twice or until you blew the turbos out) you had to go with a single. Now, that MAY be different.
Tony K.
#3
Thrashing your Roy score!
iTrader: (19)
I dont care what secret sauce you use on those twins. Unless they have a Titanium secondary exhaust housing and genie under the hood blowing the heat away and making all of the same actuator and vacume problems go away there is still ne substitue for the single. I wouldnt care if they dynoed 500hp that stock set has been and continues to be a design flaw from day one made to acomidate the Auto trannie version.
Not to nock thier efforts but if you want 400hp+ the relighable way will always be the single for fundamental not personal reasons.
Not to nock thier efforts but if you want 400hp+ the relighable way will always be the single for fundamental not personal reasons.
#4
Lurking..................
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I sort of a agree. I think the upgraded twins that Bryan at BNR are producing seem to be great from what I've heard, alot better than other upgraded twins. But I still think you'll have a good amount of people going single turbo, as while a small single/upgraded twins might produce similar power a single turbo offers various little simplicity benifits that a set of upgraded twins seem to lack.
#6
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ill keep my low end with upgraded twins over the "wait" of a single any day of the week...design flaws or not...well except for some saturdays at the race track. the rest of the days Im darting around in traffic.
j
j
#7
03 Cobra Killer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: All Over
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no problems darting around in traffic with my GT35/40 setup, other than keeping the rear end planted on the road... I'm sure I don't have the 2k - 3k RPM low end you have, but when I'm darting, I wouldn't be in that RPM range anyways...
K
K
Trending Topics
#8
Weird Cat Man
My T04S is as responsive as any of the twin turbo cars I've raced on the street. I don't putz around at 2500 rpm. My car cruises at around 3500-4000 which gives me very nice response.
I think that some off the new twins such as the BNRs show a lot of promise... but the reliability remains to be seen as well as heat issues. 400 rwhp generates heat... and the single setups leave a lot more room for airflow around the area which I like. The simplicity of the single setup is great too. I don't have any solenoids any longer
I think that some off the new twins such as the BNRs show a lot of promise... but the reliability remains to be seen as well as heat issues. 400 rwhp generates heat... and the single setups leave a lot more room for airflow around the area which I like. The simplicity of the single setup is great too. I don't have any solenoids any longer
#9
03 Cobra Killer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: All Over
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I curse everytime I have to look @, work on a sequential setup... I would never go back to twins, unless they were GT28's from ASPEC.
I however, salute Bryan for he breakthrough progress on his twin setup, it fits a great nitch for those wanting 400ish rwhp but not feeling comfortable yanking everything out of their engine bay to do a single conversion...
K
I however, salute Bryan for he breakthrough progress on his twin setup, it fits a great nitch for those wanting 400ish rwhp but not feeling comfortable yanking everything out of their engine bay to do a single conversion...
K
#10
Just Call Me Terminator!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
everyone who says lag is the devil has never been in a single turbo car or wants a way to justify not spending the money. when my stock turbos came off the car i decided they are not going back on
it also seems that all that low end power that twins give you just slows down since if whenever you punch it and get boost and torque instaneously that means lots and lots of wheelspin.....
it also seems that all that low end power that twins give you just slows down since if whenever you punch it and get boost and torque instaneously that means lots and lots of wheelspin.....
#12
It's not just the debate over [no lag, decent power] -vs- [some lag, tones of power].
You also have to remember, twins are more expensive, weigh more, more complicated, more failure prone (2 things to go wrong instead of one), etc.
It's not just the power and the lag issues.
The only time I would use twins if I was running a drag only car that a single as big as a T88 or whatever was too small to produce the power I wanted.
You also have to remember, twins are more expensive, weigh more, more complicated, more failure prone (2 things to go wrong instead of one), etc.
It's not just the power and the lag issues.
The only time I would use twins if I was running a drag only car that a single as big as a T88 or whatever was too small to produce the power I wanted.
#13
WTF is wrong with it now?
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London, ON
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Bridgeported
The only time I would use twins if I was running a drag only car that a single as big as a T88 or whatever was too small to produce the power I wanted.
The only time I would use twins if I was running a drag only car that a single as big as a T88 or whatever was too small to produce the power I wanted.
It's great that BNR has managed to make so much power. But when I took my stock turbos off my car the exhaust inlet had at least a dozen cracks around the port. These can't (shouldn't?) be rebuilt. Therefore my cost would be a hell of a lot higher to go to these turbos, as I would have to buy new ones first. My car only has 50,000 miles, and I think these turbos were replaced once before I owned it. Durability will still be an issue, if BNR uses the stock housing.
#14
The one
iTrader: (5)
I think the BNR's are a new alternative for the people that were thinking about running a small single turbo.
My opinion is there are many advantages of a single turbo over a twin which have already been mentioned. We also dont know how reliable the BNR's are going to be over the long haul.
I am impressed with what Bryan has done
Congrats
Jason
My opinion is there are many advantages of a single turbo over a twin which have already been mentioned. We also dont know how reliable the BNR's are going to be over the long haul.
I am impressed with what Bryan has done
Congrats
Jason
#16
fart on a friends head!!!
heres my deal. single turboness (yes, its a word now) opens a door to many more possibilities. i have a brand new to4e xs kit and have been thinking about how ill probably get whipped by a set of bnr's. . . thats almost discomforting, but there are more roads to explore with the custom single setup. the twins are stuck in that setup. its great for the sleeper. . . in fact its awesome for the sleeper.
i feel that a custom single setup is the "gateway drug" for power adders. it opens up a door to other greater things than the kit you might have at that time.
its also a really good look, ya know. nothing looks meaner than a honker single turbo staring at your competition. haha.
i have ridden in spoautos car and i must say that the bnr's are a very respectful setup. they turned me back around. i almost went back to a twin setup, but i finally got my to4e kit in and i had to change my mind (its hard to just give up something you already have!!!). i watched stephens car blast all around birmingham and i was amazed. the bnr set is great for someone wanting to stay with the stock look.
i say that the bnrs should now be the first step to a big single setup from now on. great performance at a non-seq setup. after that kit becomes old to you then you can move up to a bigboy single turbo.
my .02
paul
i feel that a custom single setup is the "gateway drug" for power adders. it opens up a door to other greater things than the kit you might have at that time.
its also a really good look, ya know. nothing looks meaner than a honker single turbo staring at your competition. haha.
i have ridden in spoautos car and i must say that the bnr's are a very respectful setup. they turned me back around. i almost went back to a twin setup, but i finally got my to4e kit in and i had to change my mind (its hard to just give up something you already have!!!). i watched stephens car blast all around birmingham and i was amazed. the bnr set is great for someone wanting to stay with the stock look.
i say that the bnrs should now be the first step to a big single setup from now on. great performance at a non-seq setup. after that kit becomes old to you then you can move up to a bigboy single turbo.
my .02
paul
#17
Pineapple Racer
iTrader: (1)
From what I understand, the emmission ***** will be patroling the entire state next year, and I don't want to deal with having to swap the twins back in.
I'm still debating if I should go BNRs, or to4s. And just dealing with it, when it does go state wide. On the other hand, if Rich's car makes 450ish rwhp, then I'm sold. CJ
I'm still debating if I should go BNRs, or to4s. And just dealing with it, when it does go state wide. On the other hand, if Rich's car makes 450ish rwhp, then I'm sold. CJ
#18
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it al depends on the individual and what is their ultimate goal in POWER , for me there is no way a pair of upgraded twins would be able to replace my T70 on my half bridged 13B now ,and if I ever decide to change my set up , say 20B , I wouldnt have to change my turbo (already have a 1.32 housing) for that duty , and when the time comes for servicing / repairs it would be twice the expense and headache with twins.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats up everyone. In my opinion I love single turbo conversions. They are clean and can go from mild to wild. Less BS under the hood, great power and you have a lot invested. On the other hand you have the stock hybrids that are 100% bolt up, with no fabrication required. The Hybrids work for some but others may not like it apearing unmodified . Also when people need to pass inspections or emissions, they don't have to worry! I bought a 3rd gen just b/c of these twins. I have had single set ups on all my other cars, but this was the first time I have ever had anything catch me off guard! lol I bought a white 94 model with black interior, and I should get it here in 2 weeks or so. I will also be offering a Stock Moun liquid/air intercooler kit after the turbos slow down a little. Let me know if you guys have any qustions.
Bryan
www.bnrsupercars.com
Bryan
www.bnrsupercars.com
#21
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In the Sky
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: BNR turbos: Is this the end for single set up?
Originally posted by Radical Rotary Avantgard
I
I
The main problem that i see is that people buy these huge single turbo assemblies thinking there gonna make big power and not feel lag,..so they start off with the wrong sized turbo thats not putting the #'s they thought.. people just need to start off with the properly sized single turbo to begin with and work there way up to big turbo if neede... plain and simple
but i do give much praise for BNR to try something new with the stock twins
#22
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bannished
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: BNR turbos: Is this the end for single set up?
Originally posted by Badog
You'll always have people running singles. I doubt less than 1% of the people running singles (happy or not) will swap to stock manifold twins. Even it they are upgraded "super duper secret sauce" twins.
I bet that about 5-10% due goto twins, but something like the HKS or the new Aspec unit.
The advantage to having a sub $2000 set of upgraded twins is that people now have more choices for their upgrade paths. It used to be that if you wanted to make 420-450RWHP (over a long period of time, not just once or twice or until you blew the turbos out) you had to go with a single. Now, that MAY be different.
Tony K.
You'll always have people running singles. I doubt less than 1% of the people running singles (happy or not) will swap to stock manifold twins. Even it they are upgraded "super duper secret sauce" twins.
I bet that about 5-10% due goto twins, but something like the HKS or the new Aspec unit.
The advantage to having a sub $2000 set of upgraded twins is that people now have more choices for their upgrade paths. It used to be that if you wanted to make 420-450RWHP (over a long period of time, not just once or twice or until you blew the turbos out) you had to go with a single. Now, that MAY be different.
Tony K.
#23
WTB** Very Low Miles 94-95
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if my car was in a state that allowed single turbos I might consider it...i did consider it. I was going to go with the rx6 when I found no way to pass emissions.
the only way to bet thru emissions when i lived in cali..if you owned a single...was to pay some jerk 200-300 bucks to break the law for you. If you get pulled over with it the car can be towed...and you will get fix it tickets that require all stock parts (including the airbox) to be replaced.
whoever said emissions *****...you were right.
some of us dont live in the luxury of the country roads...
regardless...every time i see a post about the gt35/40 I get a bit envious...upgraded twins or not.
hahah
and finally...to all those who say singles dont lag...whatever. we have all seen the dyno charts.
I am jealous of the simplicity and low heat though...not to mention spine crushing power up top!!!
j
the only way to bet thru emissions when i lived in cali..if you owned a single...was to pay some jerk 200-300 bucks to break the law for you. If you get pulled over with it the car can be towed...and you will get fix it tickets that require all stock parts (including the airbox) to be replaced.
whoever said emissions *****...you were right.
some of us dont live in the luxury of the country roads...
regardless...every time i see a post about the gt35/40 I get a bit envious...upgraded twins or not.
hahah
and finally...to all those who say singles dont lag...whatever. we have all seen the dyno charts.
I am jealous of the simplicity and low heat though...not to mention spine crushing power up top!!!
j
Last edited by artguy; 01-21-03 at 10:27 PM.
#24
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
single is the way to go!!! no if's and's or but's!!!!if you have the right combonation a single will have only minor turbo lag, wich i think is good(who wants to be on boost at 1,500 rpm's )thats a wast of gas!! when the single big boy hits boost WHAT A FEELIN!!!!
#25
Just in time to die
iTrader: (1)
I for one would never go back to twins for many of the reasons posted here, BNR did a great job and gives people another choice but, just not for me,as poweraxel said it is how the turbo is sized that is important. I see 10lbs by 2800rpms that is more than quick enough for me and I will see over 500rwhp when the boost is turned up.I spin them now in the first three gears why would I need better lowend than that. As far as the EPA is concerned there are low mount singles offered by HKS , A-spec, and whatnot that allow you to retain the airpump.