Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Apexi AX75F92 Dyno Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #1  
Jason's Avatar
Thread Starter
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
Apexi AX75F92 Dyno Numbers

Here are some numbers for the Apexi turbo. Runs were done at 15 lbs of boost and A/F in the high 10's.

This car has ported motor, FMIC, Power FC, Twin Power, 850cc/1600cc blah blah

These runs are straight Mustang Dyno numbers with no adjustment to the settings. You can figureout what it would do on a dynojet.

Jason
Attached Thumbnails Apexi AX75F92 Dyno Numbers-apexi-turbo-002.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #2  
teamafx's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: pembroke, massachusetts
not bad, a step up from the rx6b kit definetely
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 07:58 PM
  #3  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Hmmm, that's about right.
I think the target numbers are about 500hp at the wheels on pump gas.
So those are pretty reasonable.


-Ted
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #4  
Jason's Avatar
Thread Starter
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by RETed
Hmmm, that's about right.
I think the target numbers are about 500hp at the wheels on pump gas.
So those are pretty reasonable.


-Ted
500 RWHP on pump gas?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #5  
Boosted!'s Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
500RWHP on 94 octane? that can't be too common
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 01:41 AM
  #6  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Yeah, on "pump gas".
It was posted in one of the Options magazines a few months back.
The 13B-REW was targetted to hit "500ps" at 1.3 kg/cm^2.


-Ted
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 02:02 AM
  #7  
rotoboy661's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
From: kali
damn for a 5k turbo kit

thats it???

man i was hopin to see more

mike
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 02:16 AM
  #8  
1FooknTiteFD's Avatar
Ghost Ride the Whip
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 1
From: Foster City, CA
Keep in mind ps isn't the same as RWHP. A stock FD is quoted to have 280ps so it's closer to the horsepower at the crank.

Jason, how long did it take to get that turbo? Can you get another one anytime soon?


Originally Posted by RETed
Yeah, on "pump gas".
It was posted in one of the Options magazines a few months back.
The 13B-REW was targetted to hit "500ps" at 1.3 kg/cm^2.


-Ted
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #9  
zayrx7's Avatar
the mazda zoom zoom store
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 749
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, Oh
If you add 12%- 15% that's around 447rwhp on a dyno jet. That pretty good at 15lbs of boost.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #10  
Wargasm's Avatar
Weird Cat Man
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,868
Likes: 3
From: A pale blue dot
If you just put it on a Dynojet, you'd have a solid answer there.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #11  
Jason's Avatar
Thread Starter
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
Seat of the pants it is well over 400HP. Mustang Dynos vary in numbers but its usually between 10-15% more on a Dynojet.

Jason
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 08:51 AM
  #12  
Jason's Avatar
Thread Starter
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by 1FooknTiteFD
Keep in mind ps isn't the same as RWHP. A stock FD is quoted to have 280ps so it's closer to the horsepower at the crank.

Jason, how long did it take to get that turbo? Can you get another one anytime soon?

When I got this kit it was the only one in the states at the time. I can see if they have recieved another.

Jason
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #13  
Boosted!'s Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
The kit is actually the ax75f92. Car pulls nice for 15psi
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #14  
1bad7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: cambridge
is there a kit available for the FD with this turbo? seeing as how the rx6b kit has been discontinued
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 10:27 PM
  #15  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
So for clarification, is the turbo an AX75F82 or an AX75F92?? That would make quite a difference in price I would think.

Zach
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2004 | 02:08 AM
  #16  
Bridge_FD3S's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
Originally Posted by Jason
500 RWHP on pump gas?
The AX75F92 should be putting out close to 500 at the rears.
The 82s 450rwhp.

By the way, Jason, why did you stop the pull at 7,500rpm if it was still pulling strong? Hit it to 9,000rpm and get back to us
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2004 | 09:42 PM
  #17  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA
Jason, we're still waiting to hear back from you for sure on whether the turbo in question is an AX75F82 or an AX75F92. Thanks in advance.

Zach
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 08:22 AM
  #18  
Bridge_FD3S's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
Originally Posted by BoostedRex
Jason, we're still waiting to hear back from you for sure on whether the turbo in question is an AX75F82 or an AX75F92. Thanks in advance.

Zach
What makes you question his thread title? It clearly states AX75F"82"
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 10:00 AM
  #19  
Boosted!'s Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
The turbo is the 92. The car pulls very hard for 15psi. We had it out the other day on the freeway and it pulls hard to 8K. It spools fast aswell!

But to answer your question, the turbo is not the 82. It is the larger 92.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 10:15 AM
  #20  
Jason's Avatar
Thread Starter
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
I was mistaken, its the 92. I didnt look at the turbo closely when I got it and thought it was the 82.

Jason
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 06:20 AM
  #21  
Bridge_FD3S's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Sydney Australia
I stand corrected.
The 92 is rated at 730ps. 389 rwhp is extremely low.
Isnt the Apexi drift car making 500 atw with stock ports?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 08:32 AM
  #22  
1sicsol's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
From: N/A
The apexi drift car has the larger turbo (whatever number it is??) and its probably modified or customized beyond that anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #23  
Jason's Avatar
Thread Starter
The one
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by Bridge_FD3S
I stand corrected.
The 92 is rated at 730ps. 389 rwhp is extremely low.
Isnt the Apexi drift car making 500 atw with stock ports?

389HP on a mustang is around 425 on a dynojet and that is at 15 lbs on pump gas. Those are pretty good numbers. I would be very suprised if the Apexi car is making 500 atw. If so its on race gas and over 20lbs of boost.

Jason
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #24  
MFilippello's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL
So is this thing ball bearing or not? We all have been discussing this in that other infamous thread with no solid conclusion. What's the scoop Jason? Inquiring minds want to know

Mike
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 07:43 PM
  #25  
BoostedRex's Avatar
NorCal 7's Co-founder
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 5
From: Rocklin, CA


I'm curious about a clarification on that as well.

Zach
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 PM.