Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Anyone measured their pre-turbine backpressure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2010 | 04:28 AM
  #1  
StavFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 2
From: England
Anyone measured their pre-turbine backpressure?

As title really. Wondered the sort of backpressures people have with different setups and boost levels.
Im thinking due to the rotary design that theyd not cope so well with pre-turbine backpressure as well as piston engine cars, but dont know the sort of ballpark figures, and could be hugely wrong anyhow, so wondered if anyone had any numbers from their cars?

Thanks
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #2  
proz07's Avatar
looking for 82-83 corolla
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: ar
howard coleman, rice racing(i dont think hes here anymore but can be found on aquamist forums) are the two i can think of currently.

howard coleman has a few threads on the subject.

z
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
StavFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 2
From: England
I did a search but didnt find much, apart from some stuff by Howard 6 years ago when it was actually him asking about it.

Seems 1:1 is ideal world, as ever, but not really found how much most rotary setups run yet.

If anyone has any links that would be good.

Also really wonder what mine is running, a HKS T04E on a tubular manifold at 1bar- I cant really fit a gauge without removing it all, but if anyone else has tried similar id love to know.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
I run my car MAP/EMAP to calculate efficiency so I log backpressure. 1:1 is attainable in a rotary, I see ~130% efficiency (that's intake higher than exhaust..) at 9psi at torque peak, drops off to 1:1 till redline.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #5  
AnthonyNYC's Avatar
Stay tuned...
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1997
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 1
From: West Islip, Long Island NY
Originally Posted by 2a+RoN
I run my car MAP/EMAP to calculate efficiency so I log backpressure. 1:1 is attainable in a rotary, I see ~130% efficiency (that's intake higher than exhaust..) at 9psi at torque peak, drops off to 1:1 till redline.
What are the specs on your turbo?
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 11:36 AM
  #6  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
Holset H1E with 22cm exhaust housing, probably going to step up to the 26cm. Compressor: 60/82mm, Turbine: 76/65mm
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
StavFC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 377
Likes: 2
From: England
How much boost are you running?

Thats usually the hardest thing, keeping anywhere close to 1:1 once running any decent boost levels.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 02:32 PM
  #8  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
That's at 9psi. At 14psi I saw up to 138% efficiency but dropped off sooner, hence going to the larger 26cm housing.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #9  
rxspeed7's Avatar
F-IT
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: ocala,fl
im pretty sure this is what has caused me to pop to motors. running stock 13bre's with a precision 6776e(.60 comp, .68exh ptrim) i know the housing is two small now and from what ive read i prob had way too much pre turbine back pressure cause hot air being pushed back into the motor and heating up my intake charge causing rediculious detonation.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #10  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
backpressure: a really important topic.

because i elected to build a twin (as in two) TO4 setup in 04 i decided i was in uncharted waters and had better fully instrument everything.

after talking w a bunch of turbo people i had suggestions all over the map as to hotside sizing. after splitting both initially suggested turbine housings (too much backpressure... two T3 .48s w stage 2 wheels) i decided it it was time to stop guessing.

i added bungs on the manifolds that allowed me to attach a stainless steel brakeline. i connected it to a 0-100 psi FJO pressure sensor and wired it to my Datalogit.

result: loggable digital back pressure or EMP (exhaust manifold pressure).

and it didn't look great. after a few shuffles w turbine wheel sizing and housings i ended up around 1.3 at 20 psi.

i was swinging two stage 5 wheels or 10.816 sq inches of average turbine area.

the turbo above w the P trim (65/74) is 5.89 sq inches. the key is that it is 92% of the compressor area. i really really like the GT35 size compressor w the P trim hotside for 400-450rotary app.

too much EMP does dilute the intake charge causing alot of things to happen all bad.

torque/hp is all about airflow and EMP is one of the key factors as to setting the limit.

hc

Last edited by Howard Coleman; May 4, 2010 at 07:31 AM.
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 05:38 PM
  #11  
Carlos Iglesias's Avatar
Corn-to-Noise Converter
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 505
From: The Elysian Fields (Texas)
I'm hoping that Aaron can soon add some more to this thread when they tune my car. Actually, now that I think of it, it was his craftsmanship that created the central EMP plumbing component, the divided manifold collector. Thankfully, he'll have a vested interest in my car's tune!

I suspect boost levels should be similar to Howard's.

A good discussion about this was also had over the EFI101 Forum: Let's have an Exhaust Back Pressure Discussion. However, it was not rotary-specific.
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #12  
rxspeed7's Avatar
F-IT
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: ocala,fl
hey howard, so do you also think my tiny exh played a role in my detenation prob and low power? i made 323 on a stock port re motor at 1 bar.
Reply
Old May 8, 2010 | 08:10 AM
  #13  
fd_neal's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by rxspeed7
hey howard, so do you also think my tiny exh played a role in my detenation prob and low power? i made 323 on a stock port re motor at 1 bar.
Total combinations of parts and tuning make power, your exhaust housing is only one piece of the puzzle. It is not helping your power but on its own doesnt explain the "low" power. what is your compression like, what apex seals, air filter, intercooler, etc. and of course the tune is very important.

Also a turbine housing cannot blow a motor. Poor tuning, part failure, or freak occurances blow motors. In a "normal" setup 323hp is low for 15psi, if the exhaust restriction is killing your power that bad it will be more apparent as the motors flow increases. Maybe your setup would make 315hp at 10psi, in that case poor tuning becomes the culprit with part selection limiting overall power.

Without knowing all the details its impossible to say why a motor went, exhaust manifold back pressure is only a small piece of the puzzle.
Reply
Old May 8, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #14  
Liborek's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Czech republic
Originally Posted by Carlos Iglesias
A good discussion about this was also had over the EFI101 Forum: Let's have an Exhaust Back Pressure Discussion. However, it was not rotary-specific.
on page 7, Enzo mentioned that with 91mm compressor on 13B, he saw 38 psi turbine inlet pressure with 50 psi boost. I highly suspect it is full peripheral port engine.

Also RICE RACING over ausrotary has huge thread about dataloging of his own car.
13B Street port, T04Z 1.0 A/R divided, 18 psi boost, 17 psi pre-turbo, 4 psi post-turbo. With change in exhaust setup post turbo at 17 psi boost it was 12 psi...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gxl90rx7
Haltech Forum
6
Jun 30, 2017 11:30 PM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
Postman09
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM
risingsunroof82
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Sep 9, 2015 08:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 PM.