Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

8 months and counting with no blowoff valve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2013 | 08:58 PM
  #276  
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
1.3L piston eater
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, Canada
ran no bov on a few of my rx7s for quite some time and on a 1J motor and had noticebly faster spool on all , no problems arose, deciding if i want to run no bov on my new setup (S475)
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 11:44 PM
  #277  
XLR8's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 10
From: NJ
Originally Posted by XLR8
Reworking my engine bay this winter.... Plan to run 25psi with preturbo on my new BB TD61. SERIOUSLY considering ditching my Tial 50mm.

We shall see....
Ran 24psi on my new setup with no issues..... My turbo did fail 3 days later. Smoke on startup and shot bearings. HOWEVER, it was super baked for around 30 minutes when I unknowingly left the timing locked after I first got it running. Upon tear down, it was revealed that heat killed it and my little stint with the timing was the cause.

Starting again with a fresh CHRA and billet wheel. Still planning to run no BOV so we will see where she goes.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 04:48 PM
  #278  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
most logical that i worked as a factory tech for a decade.

most logical that i haven't used a blowoff valve for about the past 3 years with no problems. neither have most of the people posting in this thread who aren't running blowoff valves and have properly running setups.

there's so much BS in this thread that it started to stink many pages ago.
The tech literature even says that the recirculation valves are to reduce noise. Nothing about turbo life, nothing about response.

Turbo life increased dramatically when watercooling became common. The old turbos died from oil coking because the bearings would run 300-400-500F (going UP after shutoff) while watercooled housings rarely if ever get significantly over coolant temp, even after engine shutoff. No oil coking = turbos don't puke the bearings after 50k like was practically expected in the 80s.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 05:03 PM
  #279  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Been running my GTX4202R on my 20b without a blow-off valve all season. At least 8-9 events without issue.

thewird
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 11:07 PM
  #280  
zbrown's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: scranton nd
jesus more idiots than i remembered in here, almost worse than Tech

if you honestly think the thrust bearing on a journal bearing turbo doesn't see any ill from the stalling you are on crack

the thrust is loaded pushing towards the compressor under normal conditions, let it bark and the thrust vibrates loading one side of the thrust then to the other

plus the radial load placed on the shaft
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 10:19 AM
  #281  
rolfs_7's Avatar
i play with my wankel
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: North Manchester, Indiana
How many cubic feet of air do you figure your intake system from the turbo to the throttle body holds compressed at however much psi you're boosting?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2013 | 10:32 AM
  #282  
strang3majik's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, PA
Originally Posted by peejay
The tech literature even says that the recirculation valves are to reduce noise. Nothing about turbo life, nothing about response.

Turbo life increased dramatically when watercooling became common. The old turbos died from oil coking because the bearings would run 300-400-500F (going UP after shutoff) while watercooled housings rarely if ever get significantly over coolant temp, even after engine shutoff. No oil coking = turbos don't puke the bearings after 50k like was practically expected in the 80s.
Dodge used water cooled garret and Mitsubishi turbos from the factory from 84-92/3 with a factory bypass valve. Never any premature failures besides the occasional case.

Mitsubishi used their own turbos, water cooled, no bypass/bov, those turbos never saw over 50k less the car was not boosted its entire life. Usually automatic cars.

Mitsubishi Colts from the late 70s early 80s used water cooled turbos with no bov. Very high failure rate.

The DSMs came out with the use of a factory bpv, suddenly 100k was possible out of the same turbos used on the cars before them.

Skylines have always used Mitsubishi turbos, with a factory bpv, no issues there's.


I'm sensing a common theme. The late 70s early 80s was an experimental time for turbos on factory cars. Mistakes were made, lessons were learned.


But engineers getting paid tons of money to figure this stuff out have no idea what they're talking about.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
9
May 11, 2020 10:04 AM
Whiteboy_3rdgen
Introduce yourself
1
Jul 13, 2019 03:11 PM
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
Oct 9, 2015 10:05 PM
PinkRacer
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
43
Oct 1, 2015 09:13 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.