Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

[clarification question] Wideband placement and SS turbo manifolds.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2022 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
[clarification question] Wideband placement and SS turbo manifolds.

From what I have read , the rule of thumb says to place your Lambda Sensor about 31-36" from the turbo. Seems straight forward. Most turbos are mated to a cast manifold that hugs the keg. The variable I'm considering is the length of my manifold runners (15") . should I deduct the runner length from the suggested 31-36" and place the sensor 21" from the turbo? Or is the "from the turbo a hard fact, no matter the distance of the turbo from the exhaust port?

Thank you
Reply
Old May 16, 2022 | 06:02 AM
  #2  
Slides's Avatar
Arrogant Wankeler
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 231
From: Hunter Valley NSW Australia
On a rotary it's generally about heat management, especially if it's an innovate controller. You need to consider transient time and sensor response time for closed loop control too. There is no hard and fast rules.
Reply
Old May 16, 2022 | 06:11 AM
  #3  
Monika's Avatar
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 59
Likes: 4
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
From what I have read , the rule of thumb says to place your Lambda Sensor about 31-36" from the turbo. Seems straight forward. Most turbos are mated to a cast manifold that hugs the keg. The variable I'm considering is the length of my manifold runners (15") . should I deduct the runner length from the suggested 31-36" and place the sensor 21" from the turbo? Or is the "from the turbo a hard fact, no matter the distance of the turbo from the exhaust port?

Thank you
I installed a innovative setup with heatsink about 30 inches from the turbine discharge and the sensors did not last 30 mins. I started gettting false readings.....Lots of guys have trouble with innovatie and high power rotaries. I then got an AEM setup ( no heatsink ) and extended another 12 inches back and zero problems now. Im seeing EGTs at the runners of about 1700 full load FYI.

Last edited by Monika; May 16, 2022 at 06:15 AM.
Reply
Old May 16, 2022 | 11:37 AM
  #4  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
I'm going to be running the Haltech WB1 (Bosch), if that is of consequence.
Reply
Old May 16, 2022 | 10:39 PM
  #5  
Slides's Avatar
Arrogant Wankeler
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 231
From: Hunter Valley NSW Australia
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
I'm going to be running the Haltech WB1 (Bosch), if that is of consequence.
Should be less susceptible to overheating.
Reply
Old May 17, 2022 | 01:48 AM
  #6  
TeamRX8's Avatar
10000 RPM Lane
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 924
From: on the rev limiter
the one on mine is less than 24” past the turbo, maybe less than 18”, without a heat sink and sees the expected rotary egt just past the exhaust port it does have a forward mount turbo position though.

I’m siding with “no hard and fast rules” because the actual details likely matter …

edit: maybe 12” or less



.

.

.

Last edited by TeamRX8; May 17, 2022 at 02:21 AM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2022 | 06:38 AM
  #7  
Monika's Avatar
Full Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 59
Likes: 4
From: Canada
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
the one on mine is less than 24” past the turbo, maybe less than 18”, without a heat sink and sees the expected rotary egt just past the exhaust port it does have a forward mount turbo position though.

I’m siding with “no hard and fast rules” because the actual details likely matter …

edit: maybe 12” or less



.

.

.
it all depends what kind of driving you do and fuel type. Just daily it may last but a track car no way. Interesting manifold….whats the logic behind the crossover?
Reply
Old May 17, 2022 | 12:13 PM
  #8  
TeamRX8's Avatar
10000 RPM Lane
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 924
From: on the rev limiter
It was fabricated by the prior owner; the single wastegate is positioned on the crossover, just not installed yet on that pic. Not really ideal particularly considering it’s bridgeported and the likely gas reversion occurring there between the two pipes, but considering how little he was investing into the car it works pretty decent for what it is. The junkyard engine should have done gone blowed up at least a dozen or more times, but just keeps on going. So far it was a street-play & drag car, but I had it on the dyno for 2 hours back in Dec. making sixteen 4th gear runs and around 1600°F EGT (dash gauge) in addition to whatever came before for whatever that’s worth. It obviously isn’t an immediate failure any way.

suppose we’re in agreement on the “ no hard and fast rules” assessment though.
Reply
Old May 17, 2022 | 04:52 PM
  #9  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
After seeing that manifold that TeamRX8 shared..eek. This one is mine. 321 Stainless. Goes into a SA22C. Running a BNR turbo so its internally waste gated. I had just sprayed it with Ceracote Glacier coating. I didn't do the welding but I'm proud of the work that was done.


Reply
Old May 17, 2022 | 07:48 PM
  #10  
TeamRX8's Avatar
10000 RPM Lane
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 924
From: on the rev limiter
looks good!

the one I posted is Sch. 40 carbon steel, a real boat anchor. It won’t be around too much longer but serves the purpose until that day comes.
Reply
Old May 18, 2022 | 07:42 AM
  #11  
mr2peak's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 928
Likes: 1,060
From: Bangkok
Turblown FD iwg shorty kit has a bung about 27 1/2" from the turbo exhaust flange. I think the goal was to reproduce the stock o2 location. Helpful?
Attached Files
File Type: heic
IMG_0432.heic (2.42 MB, 109 views)
Reply
Old May 19, 2022 | 01:19 PM
  #12  
Pete_89T2's Avatar
Rotorhead for life
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1,271
From: Elkton, MD
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
From what I have read , the rule of thumb says to place your Lambda Sensor about 31-36" from the turbo. Seems straight forward. Most turbos are mated to a cast manifold that hugs the keg. The variable I'm considering is the length of my manifold runners (15") . should I deduct the runner length from the suggested 31-36" and place the sensor 21" from the turbo? Or is the "from the turbo a hard fact, no matter the distance of the turbo from the exhaust port?

Thank you
Mine is mounted approx. 14 inches away from the turbo on the DP, which when I factor in the length of the exhaust manifold tubes (it's a long runner piece) is approx. 26~28 inches from the exhaust ports. Been running this way for about 2-1/2 years with zero problems. No special heat sinks or anything, just a standard Bosch LSU 4.9 WBO2 sensor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mslo
Single Turbo RX-7's
15
Mar 2, 2021 03:03 PM
BOOSTALMIGHTY7
A-Spec Tuning
7
May 2, 2008 11:11 AM
eddierotary
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
8
Oct 23, 2006 02:13 PM
Fitness Stain
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 10, 2003 10:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.