Time Slips and Dyno Section is for posting 1/4 mile time slips and dyno graphs

1990 NA Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #1  
pd_day's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
1990 NA on Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.

Hi guys,

I finally dyno'ed my car after a few mods.
Last year, I dynoed 142rwhp on a dynojet.

Mods were:
Cone intake
stock exhaust
Crane CDI ignition
SR motorsport lighten flywheel
SAFC tuning
Pinapple racing sleeves.

This year, I dyno'ed 151 rwhp on a mustang dyno. ( I think the correlation on dyno jet vs mustang dyno is around 10% lower on the mustang)

Mods were:
Same as above, but with

SDJ header
Borla XR-1 midpipe
2.5 inch exhaust
SAFC re-tuned.




A/F was at around 13. I think if I leaned out more to 13.5 ish, I'll pick up another 2 -3 hp or so. What do you guys think?

Before the dyno, I also compression tested my engine

Front : 9.3 / 9.3 / 9.3
Rear: 8.7 / 8.9 / 8.7

Not too shabby for 200k km (125k miles) on the motor.
Attached Thumbnails 1990 NA Mustang Dyno with 200k km motor.-dyno.jpg  

Last edited by pd_day; Jun 5, 2006 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #2  
cool_as_crap's Avatar
He who smokes bitches
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,452
Likes: 0
From: El Dorado County
sweet.
what is your torque like?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:16 PM
  #3  
pd_day's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
Originally Posted by cool_as_crap
sweet.
what is your torque like?
It's 113lb/tq

The blue line on the graph.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
Cheers!'s Avatar
Former Rx7 *****
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
weak. You need turbo
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 12:33 AM
  #5  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
I expected alot more out of the SDJ header.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 12:54 AM
  #6  
pd_day's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
Originally Posted by Jager
I expected alot more out of the SDJ header.

With the Solo1 correction factor of 0.830 on Mustang dyno, that works out to around 187hp at the crank ...

That's 27 hp over stock with just intake, exhaust and tuning .... pretty good in my books.

I would be interested to see how the graph of a car with RB header would look like comparing to one with my SDJ.

BTW, of the few cars I compared with that had the RB header on, I would pull on them at high end all the time.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 12:57 AM
  #7  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Hmmhm, I was just told that the SDJ header was something sick or unreal. I think I had too high of expectations.

Looks great. Future mods planned?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 01:07 AM
  #8  
pd_day's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
Originally Posted by Jager
Hmmhm, I was just told that the SDJ header was something sick or unreal. I think I had too high of expectations.

Looks great. Future mods planned?

That's alright, I think the advantage lies in the wieght of the header.
SDJ is stainless steel while RB is mid steel, you are saving 10lbs of so already.

Also, I had the RB header before, comparing the 2, I feel I have more tq thru out the powerband and slightly more power up top with the SDJ.

Anyhoo, it's a little engine sucking in 1.3L of air ...... if there is a few hp difference between 2 setups, it's pretty huge already ... =0
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 01:08 AM
  #9  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by pd_day
That's alright, I think the advantage lies in the wieght of the header.
SDJ is stainless steel while RB is mid steel, you are saving 10lbs of so already.

Also, I had the RB header before, comparing the 2, I feel I have more tq thru out the powerband and slightly more power up top with the SDJ.

Anyhoo, it's a little engine sucking in 1.3L of air ...... if there is a few hp difference between 2 setups, it's pretty huge already ... =0
Ah, that I did not know. What's the next plan?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 01:10 AM
  #10  
pd_day's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
I might port and polish the intake manifold runners...

Don't know if that'll give a good increase thou .....
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 09:41 AM
  #11  
pd_day's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spoolin'
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 43
From: Miss.
Originally Posted by Cheers!
weak. You need turbo
No, I should follow in John's foot steps and do a LS7 swap.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #12  
1SWEET7's Avatar
Now With 10th AE Fun!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 1
From: CA
Sweet. I was expecting a little more with the SDJ header too. I really want to get my car dynoed and get my SAFC II tuned.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
rx7inoregon
Old School and Other Rotary
5
Oct 1, 2015 12:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.