Canadian Forum Canadian users, post event and club info here.

Archangel : Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
Archangels's Avatar
Thread Starter
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Exclamation Archangel : Dyno Results

I'm pretty disapointed with the outcome but happy that i tuned it myself on the dyno with toma's help....



220rwhp @ 5800rpm
192lbtq @ 5900rpm


On a Mustang Dyno, so i guess the equivalent on a Dynojet would be;

253rwhp @ 5800rpm
220lbtq @ 5900rpm


What do you guys think of my AF ratio's?...

They are a steady 11.5:1 with a spike of 12.0:1....

should be ok?...

Untuned it WOULD NOT revv past 6000rpm, then we lowered the AFratio and lowered the gain and it cleared up pretty well....



I'm not overly happy with the results, but keeping in mind i was only boosting 9psi, it's not all that bad....

I guess if anything, with Toma's help ofcourse, i'm glad i could tune the car ( FCON's GCC ) all by myself, from the baseline run i gained 30hp and approx 40lbtq.... Mind you the baseline was a very ridgid line, where in the end ( above ) was pretty smooth....


Last edited by Archangels; Sep 26, 2005 at 11:02 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #2  
Dragoon's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 149
Likes: 8
From: Calgary
Your car has the FC Power-FC right?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 10:46 PM
  #3  
Archangels's Avatar
Thread Starter
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
nope, just the FCON with the GCC....

what do you guys think of my AF ratio's?...

they are a steady 11.5:1 with a spike of 12.0:1....

should be ok?...
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 11:00 PM
  #4  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
yeah those afr's will be fine.

also, piggybacks suck ***.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #5  
Archangels's Avatar
Thread Starter
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
yeah those afr's will be fine.

also, piggybacks suck ***.
i'm noticing, holy fawk!...

so the 2 blips into low 12's are ok?!?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #6  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
ya man 12's are cool just 13's you gotta watch out for. plus your not boosting overly much.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #7  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
Your torque curve is nice. Something to be proud of.

What kind of power is the BNR3 'supposed' to make that would make you unhappy?

Also, I'm a bit confused about your peak power being earlier than peak torque. Normally it is torque that would drop off first. I wonder if that is some sort of flow issue with the hybrid?

Still, nice job tuning yourself
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #8  
Archangels's Avatar
Thread Starter
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
thats on the stock turbo at 9psi, i dont think i told any of you....

I WANT a bigger turbo....

it only boosts 9psi when i'm winding 3rd out, but creeps 2more PSI in 4th, i dont know why but i dont want to risk my motor....

the first graph looked terrible, but i got it to look like that, peak torque and hp come in at almost the same time....
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #9  
Roshambo's Avatar
..
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: ..
Originally Posted by Archangels
..........

220rwhp @ 5800rpm
192lbtq @ 5900rpm


On a Mustang Dyno, so i guess the equivalent on a Dynojet would be;

253rwhp @ 5800rpm
220lbtq @ 5900rpm


..............
You can't just use a fudge factor of 15% across the board to compare to a dynojet and call it a day. I have seen numbers vary from 15% to 8% to even the Mustang reading higher numbers. Go figure. In your case you put down 220rwhp on the mustang dyno, end of story.

Knowing what it's in the car would be nice as well as I have no clue if I should be impressed with your numbers or wondering how a potentially good setup went so wrong.

Originally Posted by Archangels
................

it only boosts 9psi when i'm winding 3rd out, but creeps 2more PSI in 4th, i dont know why but i dont want to risk my motor.....
You maxing out your wastegate capacity and hence the creep or your boost controller is not doing it's job....provided you have one.

Last edited by Roshambo; Sep 27, 2005 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #10  
Archangels's Avatar
Thread Starter
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Mods:

- S4 Block with S5 Externals
- 3" Racing Beat Turbo-Back Exhaust
- Blitz SS BOV
- Coilovers ( Tein rear, Ground Control front )
- Centerforce Dual-Friction clutch
- HKS PFC F-Con
- HKS GCC
- Knights Turbo-Timer
- Knights FCD
- FD Flywheel
- JDM Brake Balancer
- Stainless-Steel Braded Brake Lines
- Autometer boost and A/F guages
- MazdaSpeed steering wheel
- MazdaSpeed racing pedels
- Manaray 6spoke 16" rims
- K&N Filter on 3Inch TID
- Yokohama AVS ES100 Z-Rated rubber
- Greddy ProfecB SpecII Boost controller
- Walbro 255lph Fuel Pump
- Greddy Vspec FMIC
- MSD 8.5cm Race-Wires
- Megan Strut-Tower Bar
- Denso 720cc Secondary's


ok ok ok, i made 220rwhp on a mustang dyno, i was told it's roughly 15% conversion for a dynojet so i converted it for the hell of it.... but your right, i only made 220rwhp on a Mustang Dyno....

I'm on a stock turbo aswell, thats dieing....

Last edited by Archangels; Sep 27, 2005 at 01:10 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #11  
soloracer951's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 480
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB Canada
Agreed. I dynoed my 944 Turbo on both a Mustang and Dynojet with a similar set up and made almost identical power. I read somewhere that the dyno differences are not as signifigant on a turbo car due to the fact that a Mustang dyno puts a load on the car which helps with spool. On the Mustang Dyno I was running smaller injectors and different chips than I was running on the Dynojet. Both times I put down 270 rwhp. This winter I upgraded to a bigger turbo, bigger injectors, new chips and the car felt stronger. I went to the Dynojet again and it made 303 rwhp. Now if it was true that the Mustang reads 15% less you would believe that my 270 rwhp pull should net 310 on the Dynojet. If that were true then you would have to believe that my very first dyno pull with the small turbo and smaller injectors made the same power at the same boost level as my new big turbo and bigger injectors? Not likely. It more likely that there isn't as big a difference as is made out to be. Just out of curiousity has anyone dynoed at a Mustang and the same day drove over and dynoed at a Dynojet? I'm thinking of doing it just for ***** and giggles......
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 11:49 PM
  #12  
Archangels's Avatar
Thread Starter
- Make Haste -
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
i just noticed it's 224hp, hehehe....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
Rotate86
Single Turbo RX-7's
5
May 18, 2018 02:44 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
userjh5174
Alternative Fuels
1
Jan 9, 2016 08:49 AM
baix2
Power FC Forum
1
Sep 28, 2015 09:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.