Rtek Forum Discuss the Rtek 2.0 and other Rtek ECU's

Rtek wideband connecting to Rtek

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #1  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
wideband connecting to Rtek

I'm getting an Rtek 2.0 for my s4 na and i'm also getting a wideband (not sure which one yet, probably AEM UEGO). The DT website says Rtek can use either the stock narrowband or wideband for fuel calculations.

So if I got the AEM one would i need to get the wideband sensor and controller or just the sensor?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #2  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
You need the sensor plus controller. Buy a Zeitronix. Zeitronix also features EGT and it's display can be by the Palm that is used by the RTEK2.0/2.1. See the Digital Tuning site for ZEITRONIX.

The Zeitronix can also display the starting rpms when you do a compression check. The RTEK2.1 can't do that.

The Zeitronix 02 output can be also read on the Palm when the Palm is connected to the RTEK 2.1.

Stuff just cost dough. The Govt is printing dough and devaluing the dough in your back pocket. Don't worry about the future. HillObama will take care of all your needs and wants. Can anybody say Ponzi Scheme and Social Security in the same breath? sad humor
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #3  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Dude the AEM UEGO does not have a linear 0-5v signal. It has a polynomial signal. You will not get accurate readings.

Innovate, Zeitronix, PLX, there are a lot of choices. But the AEM has a notoriously bad 0-5v output.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #4  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Dude the AEM UEGO does not have a linear 0-5v signal. It has a polynomial signal. You will not get accurate readings.

Innovate, Zeitronix, PLX, there are a lot of choices. But the AEM has a notoriously bad 0-5v output.
I did not know that. Good stuff, I'll look into those.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #5  
NJGreenBudd's Avatar
rx-for-my-7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 15
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by HAILERS
You need the sensor plus controller. Buy a Zeitronix. Zeitronix also features EGT and it's display can be by the Palm that is used by the RTEK2.0/2.1. See the Digital Tuning site for ZEITRONIX.

The Zeitronix can also display the starting rpms when you do a compression check. The RTEK2.1 can't do that.

The Zeitronix 02 output can be also read on the Palm when the Palm is connected to the RTEK 2.1.

Stuff just cost dough. The Govt is printing dough and devaluing the dough in your back pocket. Don't worry about the future. HillObama will take care of all your needs and wants. Can anybody say Ponzi Scheme and Social Security in the same breath? sad humor
I agree. It's no good man, no good. The future that is, not the Zeitronix. I am going to try to connect my NGK A/Fx in a couple of days when I install the 2.1 upgrade chip. Anybody had experience with this combo??
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #6  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Ok is it worth the extra effort to wire the Wideband into the Rtek as opposed to simply running the Rtek off of the stock narrow band and then installing the wideband as a seperate gauge. Does it affect the way the ECU operates?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #7  
NJGreenBudd's Avatar
rx-for-my-7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 15
From: New Jersey
well, I plan on using the accurate readings of the wideband to tune the fuel maps, So i need to log the wideband, if you don't need to log the wideband then I wouldn't wire a narrow band to the Rtek, that would be silly.

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your question. The rtek will display the stock narrow band O2 signal normally, but this isn't useful for tuning fuel maps. The Rtek is also capable of logging a 0-5v wideband signal which is useful for tuning fuel maps.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #8  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Meh, I'd just keep the stock O2 sensor in there and leave the stock narrowband wire alone. No sense in cutting up more of the stock harness than necessary IMO. Then install the wideband in a bung as far back as possible to keep it from over heating. I have a test pipe so I have mine installed right before my RB catback.

Then splice in the 0-5v output wire on your wideband to what, the variable resistor wire? whatever the instructions call for. Also be very careful about the way you wire your grounds. Follow the instructions for your wideband carefully because you can get electrical noise that will screw up the reading that goes to the Rtek. Ideally you would have the wideband hooked into the Rtek so you can display that information in your datalogs, AND have a separate AFR gauge.

On my car with Innovate LC-1 wideband, I have the 0-5v output wire going into my Power FC (datalogit box), then I have a wideband display gauge mounted in the center of the steering column under the tach (blocks shift up light but oh well). That way it's really easy to see. I use the autometer universal mounting cup.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #9  
sonick117x's Avatar
the crowned prince
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: hamilton, jerz
what product would you want from zeitronix to hook a wideband sensor to datalog to the rtek? would you need the whole zt2 controller/datalogging setup?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #10  
rogrx7's Avatar
Turbovert done.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 5
From: Miami
Originally Posted by arghx
Dude the AEM UEGO does not have a linear 0-5v signal. It has a polynomial signal. You will not get accurate readings.

Innovate, Zeitronix, PLX, there are a lot of choices. But the AEM has a notoriously bad 0-5v output.
The AEM is not a bad setup if you have the UEGO kit. (Controller with AEM Gauge)

Correct me if Im wrong, but if you have the UEGO with Gauge the output from the gauge WILL be Linear. If you have the set-up without the gauge it just spits out polynomials...maybe this information should be added to the pocketlogger site or Rtek manual.

Is it possible for the 2.0 to have a selection for polynomial inputs?

I think the Equation from the AEM forum is

AFR = .0295X^4-.1795X^3+.4877X^2+.5333X+8.4422
where X = voltage (0-5V)
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #11  
boost_its_what_for_dinner's Avatar
RotoriousRx7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: goodlettsville,tennessee 37072
i have the whole wb02 uego kit and it works just fine........ dont be a cheap *** and try to throw something together.. buy one full wb02 kit and use it
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #12  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
I don't have an Rtek 2.0 . I used to have an Rtek 1.7, and I used to have an AEM UEGO.

All I know is that "AFR=.0295X^4-.1795X^3+.4877X^2+.5333X+8.4422 " where x=voltage is clearly NOT a linear function. That's highschool algebra right there. And the instructions for the Rtek clearly state that you need a LINEAR 0-5v input.

So either the Rtek does in fact support widebands with a polynomial output, or those of you using the AEM UEGO with your Rtek are not getting a 100% accurate signal. Now that doesn't mean the signal is completely unusable, but I wouldn't fully trust it. Anecdotally, I helped my friend tune his 3000GT with an AEM UEGO, using a MAP ECU system, which needs a 0-5v linear input. And I noticed discrepancies at certain AFR's, especially as the mixture got richer.

Unless you can prove accuracy by overlaying a log of the AFR's displayed by the UEGO gauge itself with the AFR's that the Rtek is interpreting from the analog signal, I am inclined to believe that the Rtek is not receiving a fully accurate signal.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #13  
boost_its_what_for_dinner's Avatar
RotoriousRx7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
From: goodlettsville,tennessee 37072
the rtek 2.0-.1 have a preset for the use of uego and plx deivices so i dont know what wrong and my afr's from the aem guage to the pda display are maybe .1+/- off from each other
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #14  
sonick117x's Avatar
the crowned prince
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: hamilton, jerz
the uego kit seems pretty affordable and if the rtek has presets to read uego then it seems like a well fit match.. boost its what for dinner is backing that up with his own personal experience.. sounds like a winner to me
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #15  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
I like how you can get the Zeitronix with a EGT sensor. I was also reading on their site that you can also get a MAP sensor hooked up to the same system. If I got that MAP sensor add-on could I omit the stock MAF sensor?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:13 PM
  #16  
rogrx7's Avatar
Turbovert done.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 5
From: Miami
Originally Posted by arghx
I don't have an Rtek 2.0 . I used to have an Rtek 1.7, and I used to have an AEM UEGO.

All I know is that "AFR=.0295X^4-.1795X^3+.4877X^2+.5333X+8.4422 " where x=voltage is clearly NOT a linear function. That's highschool algebra right there. And the instructions for the Rtek clearly state that you need a LINEAR 0-5v input.

So either the Rtek does in fact support widebands with a polynomial output, or those of you using the AEM UEGO with your Rtek are not getting a 100% accurate signal. Now that doesn't mean the signal is completely unusable, but I wouldn't fully trust it. Anecdotally, I helped my friend tune his 3000GT with an AEM UEGO, using a MAP ECU system, which needs a 0-5v linear input. And I noticed discrepancies at certain AFR's, especially as the mixture got richer.

Unless you can prove accuracy by overlaying a log of the AFR's displayed by the UEGO gauge itself with the AFR's that the Rtek is interpreting from the analog signal, I am inclined to believe that the Rtek is not receiving a fully accurate signal.


Did u not read what I said?

the lines that come out of the AEM GAUGE ARE LINEAR!

The lines that come out of the AEM controller are POLY!

Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #17  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by rogrx7


Did u not read what I said?

the lines that come out of the AEM GAUGE ARE LINEAR!

The lines that come out of the AEM controller are POLY!
what?? maybe im missing something, but arent the controller and guage the same thing? or did you mean the output of the actual o2 sensor is polynomial?

i have the eugo, works fine for me, matches what the rtek says both at idle (12.5) and closed loop (14.7), using linear scaling
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 05:31 AM
  #18  
rogrx7's Avatar
Turbovert done.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 5
From: Miami
Originally Posted by gxl90rx7
what?? maybe im missing something, but arent the controller and guage the same thing? or did you mean the output of the actual o2 sensor is polynomial?

i have the eugo, works fine for me, matches what the rtek says both at idle (12.5) and closed loop (14.7), using linear scaling
AEM has three different wideband setup that they sell.

The AEM Single channel
The AEM Dual Channel
The AEM AEM’s Gauge-Type Wideband

The AEM gauge type has the controller in the gauge

While I couldn't find that much information on them as far as linear reading..I think the first two wideband units readings are non-linear and the Gauge type is linear.

Last edited by rogrx7; Mar 12, 2008 at 05:37 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #19  
turbo2ltr's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 7
From: ..
Originally Posted by Unseen24-7
If I got that MAP sensor add-on could I omit the stock MAF sensor?
No, they have nothing to do with each other.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #20  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
No, they have nothing to do with each other.
I just figured that since the MAP sensor add-on plugs into the Zeitronix controller, which then plugs into the Rtek, that the Rtek could interpret the the MAP signal, but I guess not.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #21  
Wizz's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
Originally Posted by arghx
Dude the AEM UEGO does not have a linear 0-5v signal. It has a polynomial signal. You will not get accurate readings.

Innovate, Zeitronix, PLX, there are a lot of choices. But the AEM has a notoriously bad 0-5v output.
Originally Posted by rogrx7
AEM has three different wideband setup that they sell.

The AEM Single channel
The AEM Dual Channel
The AEM AEM’s Gauge-Type Wideband

The AEM gauge type has the controller in the gauge

While I couldn't find that much information on them as far as linear reading..I think the first two wideband units readings are non-linear and the Gauge type is linear.

I'm going to have to agree that the gauge type 0-5v output is linear. Why you ask? I just called AEM tech support and they said it was.

AEM General Tech Support
For technical questions concerning installation, troubleshooting, and warranty inquiries regarding AEM's line of performance products, not including the EMS unit, please call our sales line at (310) 484-2322.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #22  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
The AEM tech support guys? The same idiots who, after multiple phone calls, finally let me return my faulty gauge with a bad display, then sent it right back to me when it was still broken (with no explanation of what "repair" they did)? The idiots who dicked me around for over a month until I got the customer service department to force them to send me a new gauge?

I don't know about the Rtek 2.0/2.1 , but on the applications I've seen that weren't AEM EMS (Power FC, MAP ECU), the readings were not accurate. I'm not sure if that's because the signal is linear or not (the gauge and the controller are the same thing in this particular product) or because of electrical noise. Also, take a look at the AFR vs. voltage chart that comes with the instructions. It's not linear from what I remember. Why the hell would you even need a big AFR vs. voltage chart when you could say "0 volts is 8:1 and 5 volts is 17:1) or whatever?

The bottom line is, there's no point in getting the AEM if you need something with a reliable 0-5v output. There are other choices. I sold that AEM gauge because the tech support guys are ******** and their product is unreliable.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #23  
rogrx7's Avatar
Turbovert done.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 5
From: Miami
Originally Posted by arghx
The AEM tech support guys? The same idiots who, after multiple phone calls, finally let me return my faulty gauge with a bad display, then sent it right back to me when it was still broken (with no explanation of what "repair" they did)? The idiots who dicked me around for over a month until I got the customer service department to force them to send me a new gauge?

I don't know about the Rtek 2.0/2.1 , but on the applications I've seen that weren't AEM EMS (Power FC, MAP ECU), the readings were not accurate. I'm not sure if that's because the signal is linear or not (the gauge and the controller are the same thing in this particular product) or because of electrical noise. Also, take a look at the AFR vs. voltage chart that comes with the instructions. It's not linear from what I remember. Why the hell would you even need a big AFR vs. voltage chart when you could say "0 volts is 8:1 and 5 volts is 17:1) or whatever?

The bottom line is, there's no point in getting the AEM if you need something with a reliable 0-5v output. There are other choices. I sold that AEM gauge because the tech support guys are ******** and their product is unreliable.
Bro, every company give you the run around when your **** breaks.

As far as accurate. If the sensor is to close to the motor you'll fry the sensor and if you run the car pig rich carbon may build up on the sensor and give u a crappy reading.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #24  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
Does the Rtek use a serial input for wideband or something else? Basically do i need a wideband that has a serial output?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #25  
turbo2ltr's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 7
From: ..
Please read the "What you think you know about widebands, but dont" sticky!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.