Rtek rtec & safc II
Rtek is a fuel and timing EM chip that can do way more then the SAFC can.
If you have a Rtek, you do not need a SAFC or another piggy back or a standalone. You do not want to run two engine managment controlers together at all.
If you have a Rtek, you do not need a SAFC or another piggy back or a standalone. You do not want to run two engine managment controlers together at all.
With that said, I run an SAFC with my 1.7 to dial things in a bit more. There's too many different types of injectors out there for the 1.7 to work perfect on every setup without some fine tuning. I would highly recomend a wideband to use in conjunction with the safc.
Last edited by gross polluter; Sep 25, 2007 at 10:52 AM.
With that said, I run an SAFC with my 1.7 to dial things in a bit more. There's too many different types of injectors out there for the 1.7 to work perfect on every setup without some fine tuning. I would highly recomend a wideband to use in conjunction with the safc.
Trending Topics
The 1.x series ECU's are not programmable, so there's no "presets" beyond what the ECU is programed for. The 1.7 is set for stock primary and 720cc secondary injectors. I ran an SAFC and used a ZT-2 and Pocketlogger ZT for AFR monitoring, for balling on a budget it's a very solid setup.
The SAFC and SAFC-II modify the airflow signal in the exact same manner so functionality wise there's not much difference with exception of more tuning points on the SAFC-II.
Ninja edit: Mike beat me to it.
The SAFC and SAFC-II modify the airflow signal in the exact same manner so functionality wise there's not much difference with exception of more tuning points on the SAFC-II.
Ninja edit: Mike beat me to it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SaabGuy
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
19
Feb 4, 2004 08:25 PM
SaabGuy
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Apr 21, 2002 07:16 AM
crossbar17
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
11
Apr 1, 2002 09:20 AM



I automatically though about the 2.0. Sorry OP


