Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Power-up for N/A, can this be done?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Power-up for N/A, can this be done?

Ok, in the second gen forum someone brought up using C02 to cool intake air. This being put aside almost immediately for a short discussion on using compressed air in the intake.

That being said, here's the question:

Would it be possible to use a compressed air tank to force more air into the engine in the place of the turbo?

I understand that it you would have to get the fuel system to use more fuel so it doesn't run lean, I'm sure there's a way to do this without running an aftermarket ECU.

I think this sounds really cool and, compared to some choices, not too expensive if done right. ( of course done RIGHT, talk about expensive)

I don't mean to use this in place of a turbo completely (that'll come later) I just mean for a few burst of turbo power.

Any of you rotary gods in here, PLEASE input.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 11:47 PM
  #2  
now's Avatar
now
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 4
From: alberta, canada
well if you think about how much air a 13b pulls in at say
5000rpm the amount of compressed air to make any
kind of difference would be huge, you would have to
pull a storage tank the size of the car of have dive bottles of air
with 3000psi in them, and even then a dive bottle only
holds 80 cubic feet of air at 3000psi which wouldn't last long.
I know that all this can be calculated and explained with
numbers but i am to lazy to figure it out.

matt
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 03:18 PM
  #3  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 569
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I did the math on this once, somewhere.

IN a nutshell, because *all* of the engine's air would have to come from the tank (to prevent it getting blown out into the atmosphere through an open throttle). This required a necessarily large and high pressure tank, I think on the order of something taking up the entire hatch area at a pressure of over 400psi. Not worth the while, even if it wasn't a huge weight penalty and an even huger safety risk. (Yeah, home fabricated air tank at 400psi, *that's* what I want 6 inches from my head....)

Search isn't functioning right now. Search for "compressed air" for posted written by me, and it should turn up.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 26, 2015 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.