PFS tuned GT42R makes 643rwhp!!!!!
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
PFS tuned GT42R makes 643rwhp!!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Went back today for some final tuning and Ray made some huge power! At 31psi it made 643.9rwhp and 520 torque! Holy ****, even if I can't drive, I gotta run 9's!!!! HUGE PROPS to Ray. The man is a wizard. This is all on a PFS street port and C116.
Went back today for some final tuning and Ray made some huge power! At 31psi it made 643.9rwhp and 520 torque! Holy ****, even if I can't drive, I gotta run 9's!!!! HUGE PROPS to Ray. The man is a wizard. This is all on a PFS street port and C116.
Originally Posted by ErnieT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Went back today for some final tuning and Ray made some huge power! At 31psi it made 643.9rwhp and 520 torque! Holy ****, even if I can't drive, I gotta run 9's!!!! HUGE PROPS to Ray. The man is a wizard. This is all on a PFS street port and C116.
Went back today for some final tuning and Ray made some huge power! At 31psi it made 643.9rwhp and 520 torque! Holy ****, even if I can't drive, I gotta run 9's!!!! HUGE PROPS to Ray. The man is a wizard. This is all on a PFS street port and C116.
Trending Topics
HOLY ****! That's just crazy HP on 31psi Congrats Ernie
Looks like that turbo really starts flowing at higher boost levels.
What map sensor do you have in the car?
Anthony
Looks like that turbo really starts flowing at higher boost levels.
What map sensor do you have in the car?
Anthony
Last edited by AnthonyNYC; Nov 17, 2005 at 03:41 AM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally Posted by AnthonyNYC
HOLY ****! That's just crazy HP on 31psi Congrats Ernie
Looks like that turbo really starts flowing at higher boost levels.
What map sensor do you have in the car?
Anthony
Looks like that turbo really starts flowing at higher boost levels.
What map sensor do you have in the car?
Anthony
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: london uk
wow bet you got a big cheesy grin good luck 2 you mate hope you get some good times 9s should not be a prob as theres one in the uk runs a 9.83 143mph with 570whp.
what kind of milleage can you expect from your engine running that horse power?
what kind of milleage can you expect from your engine running that horse power?
I wish I was driving!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
643 will barely get you to 10 flat 
. (I know that's BS)
A local "tuner" had posted dyno graphs of his "704 rwhp" FC and his best is 10.044 @ 147 mph. The numbers just don't seem to add up to me. Anyone else think that trap speed and time is bogus for 700+ hp?
Congrats on the numbers BTW. I look forward to seeing your times.
. (I know that's BS)A local "tuner" had posted dyno graphs of his "704 rwhp" FC and his best is 10.044 @ 147 mph. The numbers just don't seem to add up to me. Anyone else think that trap speed and time is bogus for 700+ hp?
Congrats on the numbers BTW. I look forward to seeing your times.
Last edited by scathcart; Nov 17, 2005 at 06:48 PM.
Originally Posted by scathcart
643 will barely get you to 10 flat . (I know that's BS)
A local "tuner" had posted dyno graphs of his "704 rwhp" FC and his best is 10.044 @ 147 mph. The numbers just don't seem to add up to me. Anyone else think that trap speed and time is bogus for 700+ hp?
Congrats on the numbers BTW. I look forward to seeing your times.
. (I know that's BS)A local "tuner" had posted dyno graphs of his "704 rwhp" FC and his best is 10.044 @ 147 mph. The numbers just don't seem to add up to me. Anyone else think that trap speed and time is bogus for 700+ hp?
Congrats on the numbers BTW. I look forward to seeing your times.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally Posted by scathcart
643 will barely get you to 10 flat . (I know that's BS)
A local "tuner" had posted dyno graphs of his "704 rwhp" FC and his best is 10.044 @ 147 mph. The numbers just don't seem to add up to me. Anyone else think that trap speed and time is bogus for 700+ hp?
Congrats on the numbers BTW. I look forward to seeing your times.
. (I know that's BS)A local "tuner" had posted dyno graphs of his "704 rwhp" FC and his best is 10.044 @ 147 mph. The numbers just don't seem to add up to me. Anyone else think that trap speed and time is bogus for 700+ hp?
Congrats on the numbers BTW. I look forward to seeing your times.
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Gallatin, TN
Originally Posted by ErnieT
If I had a different intake manifold.
I should have some drawings to show you this weekend!BTW, have you thought of an air-water intercooler? Might see a little higher intake temps during street use, but you could run ice at the track.
-Alex
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally Posted by TT_Rex_7
I'm hoping you let me change that for you! I should have some drawings to show you this weekend!
BTW, have you thought of an air-water intercooler? Might see a little higher intake temps during street use, but you could run ice at the track.
-Alex
I should have some drawings to show you this weekend!BTW, have you thought of an air-water intercooler? Might see a little higher intake temps during street use, but you could run ice at the track.
-Alex
As far as the air to water intercooler, I would be I want to run the street class next year and ya can't have that.
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
From: Belleville, IL
Originally Posted by ErnieT
Sounds good!
As far as the air to water intercooler, I would be I want to run the street class next year and ya can't have that.
As far as the air to water intercooler, I would be I want to run the street class next year and ya can't have that.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 0
From: Abingdon, Md
Originally Posted by LUPE
Yeah, it sucks though. All that extra weight 
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
From: Belleville, IL
Originally Posted by ErnieT
Won't be too bad. With skinnies, my car only weigh 2600lbs. A cage may add 100lbs.
