Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Next Generation Renesis (Rotary Engine 16X), photos from Tokyo Auto Show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-07, 02:07 AM
  #26  
Lost You in the Rear View

 
RotaryBred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scotty305
If I had to guess, I'd say it won't see forced induction for the first few years, if ever. I've heard horror stories about what happens to Renesis motors when they blow apex seals: without a peripheral exhaust port, there's not an easy place for the broken seals to get puked out of the motor, they stay inside and chew things up for a while. It would be a shame to risk the reputation of the new platform, I think it would be wiser to add another rotor than to add a turbocharger.

-s-
i'm still puzzled as to why they are still doing the side port exhaust. you think they would've learned that more power can be harnessed with peripheral ports which would make the sale of the car more appealing to the young and old, and raise gas milage since it is much less restrictive. Old people dont want 8's because the gas mileage sucks, and young people (who care about going fast) don't want them because in order to get and real power outta them, you might as well do away with the whole engine!
Old 11-22-07, 03:08 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
hhn2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: fl
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its seems as if this engine may be better suited to boost than the original renesis.
correct me if im wrong but shorter housings mean shorter apex seals which means better resistance to breaking(less breaking points).
higher displacement generally handle boost better too i think. more surface area to cool means less chance of detonation and apex seals bouncing around.
Old 11-22-07, 04:06 AM
  #28  
Lost You in the Rear View

 
RotaryBred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hhn2002
its seems as if this engine may be better suited to boost than the original renesis.
correct me if im wrong but shorter housings mean shorter apex seals which means better resistance to breaking(less breaking points).
higher displacement generally handle boost better too i think. more surface area to cool means less chance of detonation and apex seals bouncing around.
you are correct about the apex seals, but someone correct me if I'm wrong - a high compression engine is a high compression engine. once that compression hits a certain PSI, no more boost can be pushed in. That is why the renesis is impossible to see much HP gain from compared to the previous 13b models.
Old 11-22-07, 04:45 AM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
Paul1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks Nice
Old 11-22-07, 08:25 AM
  #30  
Lost You in the Rear View

 
RotaryBred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do you think a high compression engine (since its built to withstand higher pressures) would respond to insane amounts of boost with a water/meth injection kit and really good tune? just a thought
Old 11-22-07, 10:15 AM
  #31  
Lapping = Fapping

iTrader: (13)
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 15,725
Received 70 Likes on 64 Posts
Does anyone know how wide these new rotors are? I have... ideas.
Old 11-22-07, 10:24 AM
  #32  
Senior Member

 
rotormind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.J
Posts: 363
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
Does anyone know how wide these new rotors are? I have... ideas.
there suppose to be the same width as the 12a
Old 11-22-07, 10:28 AM
  #33  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The side exhaust is supposed to help with emissions to keep the unburnt hydrocarboms in the engine to get burnt, rather than being emitted as a pollutant. I think it was supposed to help milage too somehow. So while peripheral may be better for performance I don't think they can get it to pass smog any more.
Old 11-22-07, 10:46 AM
  #34  
Senior Member

 
rotormind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.J
Posts: 363
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Black91n/a
The side exhaust is supposed to help with emissions to keep the unburnt hydrocarboms in the engine to get burnt, rather than being emitted as a pollutant. I think it was supposed to help milage too somehow. So while peripheral may be better for performance I don't think they can get it to pass smog any more.
yah but the rx8 still didnt get good gas milage. i think they need to figure out more on the peripheral exhaust. the side exhaust is better on emissions because they r able to send the unburned carbons back into the combustion chamber. the problem is, its a waist of power
Old 11-22-07, 10:48 AM
  #35  
Senior Member

 
rotormind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.J
Posts: 363
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
dam, i didnt notice i just about said everything u did
Old 11-22-07, 01:43 PM
  #36  
Lives on the Forum

 
Black91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
While it may be "bad for power" the RX-8 does have the most powerful NA rotary ever produced from the factory, so a side exhaust can't be that bad.
Old 11-22-07, 05:01 PM
  #37  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
As I've posted in other threads, there is more to power than just flow. Port timing has a huge effect. This is why the Renesis does so well. It's not because of the compression ratio or the intake manifold. The Side exhaust port timing is better suited to a street engine in terms of power, emissions, and as a match for the intake port timing. The Renesis doesn't even have port overlap and many claim this is needed for good power. It's not. There are many misconceptions about flow and timing. I actually wish Mazda would develop an all side port race engine.
Old 11-22-07, 05:01 PM
  #38  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
Does anyone know how wide these new rotors are? I have... ideas.
I've heard 2 rumors but don't know for sure. One says 70mm like the 12A, and another says 75mm.
Old 11-22-07, 05:03 PM
  #39  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by rotormind
yah but the rx8 still didnt get good gas milage. i think they need to figure out more on the peripheral exhaust. the side exhaust is better on emissions because they r able to send the unburned carbons back into the combustion chamber. the problem is, its a waist of power
Put a 4.44:1 rear end in your car and add 400 lbs and see how good your mileage is! If you had a Renesis in your car, you'd get better gas mileage than you do now. You need to look at the entire package. The RX-8 actually gets comparable gas mileage to the much lighter and less agressively geared RX-7's.
Old 11-22-07, 06:09 PM
  #40  
rotor n00b

iTrader: (3)
 
MTheoryInc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ATL,GA
Posts: 111
Received 61 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryBred
you are correct about the apex seals, but someone correct me if I'm wrong - a high compression engine is a high compression engine. once that compression hits a certain PSI, no more boost can be pushed in. That is why the renesis is impossible to see much HP gain from compared to the previous 13b models.

I think the problem with a boosted renesis engine is the lack of proper stand-alone engine management. The hot ticket among turbo rx8 owners seems to be the the GReddy e-manage which as the greddy site says it best "as close to a stand-alone management system as you can get while maintaining the best features of a "piggy-back" engine management". The first key ingredients in any reliable high HP (350+ rwhp) rotary is stand-alone engine management.
Old 11-22-07, 07:46 PM
  #41  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (17)
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 3,899
Received 182 Likes on 131 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I've heard 2 rumors but don't know for sure. One says 70mm like the 12A, and another says 75mm.
Copied this from a mazdas247 post:

from a Japanese website

10A
e=15mm
R=105mm
b=60mm
Vh=491cc

13A
e=17.5mm
R=120mm
b=60mm
Vh=655cc

12A
e=15mm
R=105mm
b=70mm
Vh=573cc


13B
e=15mm
R=105mm
b=80mm
Vh=654cc

プロトタイプ

12A'(12A量産前に検討されたエンジン)
e=16.4mm
R=112mm
b=60mm
Vh=573cc

21A
e=18.5mm
R=128mm
b=85mm
Vh=1046cc

22A
e=18.5mm
R=128mm
b=95mm
Vh=1169cc

15A
e=15mm
R=105mm
b=90mm
Vh=737cc

And their guess for 16X is

16X
e=17.5
R=122.5
b=70
Vh=797cc
Old 11-22-07, 08:42 PM
  #42  
Eye In The Sky

iTrader: (2)
 
cewrx7r1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,892
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by TweakGames
true true I feel bad building a 13b right now though knowing I could have the extra .3L. A 20B has 33% increase .... a 16x is just short of a 20b... O.o

You need to redo your math.

13B = working displacement compared to a 4cycle engine = 2.6L
16X = working displacement compared to a 4cycle engine = 3.2L
20B = working displacement compared to a 4cycle engine = 3.9L

3.2/2.6 = 1.23 or 23% larger
3.9/2.6 = 1.50 or 50% larger

Old 11-22-07, 09:03 PM
  #43  
Chiptosser

 
chiptosser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Delaware , Ohio
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This should have better low end torque
Old 11-22-07, 10:20 PM
  #44  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
680RWHP12A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: chatsworth,Ca.
Posts: 4,666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
interesting motor.. its definatly a prototype, the oil filter pedastal mount only has one hole, how do ya like that?!
Old 11-22-07, 10:38 PM
  #45  
Concept Motorsports

 
Bluem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i have some SAE papers with details on the side port design if someone is interested pm me.

Developed Technologies of the New Rotary Engine (RENESIS)

by: Masaki Ohkubo, Seiji Tashima, Ritsuharu Shimizu,
Suguru Fuse and Hiroshi Ebino. Mazda Motor Corporation
Old 11-22-07, 10:45 PM
  #46  
Newbie
 
baps9422's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sweet Jesus Love It
Old 11-23-07, 03:18 AM
  #47  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,809
Received 305 Likes on 266 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryBred
i'm still puzzled as to why they are still doing the side port exhaust. you think they would've learned that more power can be harnessed with peripheral ports which would make the sale of the car more appealing to the young and old, and raise gas milage since it is much less restrictive. Old people dont want 8's because the gas mileage sucks, and young people (who care about going fast) don't want them because in order to get and real power outta them, you might as well do away with the whole engine!
they're not going back to peripheral exhaust ports. side ports are the present and future. the problem is that mainstream hasn't caught up yet. porting, especially on the exhaust appears to be a bit tricky, but the bottomline is that these side port engines do their job better than the older design. i mean think about it. stockports on these engines are making what it would take streetporting or forced induction to make on the older engines - with the same fuel. i'm sure it's just a matter of time before we all have a bag of tricks for making more power.
Old 11-23-07, 03:23 AM
  #48  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,809
Received 305 Likes on 266 Posts
Originally Posted by 680RWHP12A
... the oil filter pedastal mount only has one hole, how do ya like that?!
yeah, i was curious about that, too.

Originally Posted by rotarygod
Put a 4.44:1 rear end in your car and add 400 lbs and see how good your mileage is! If you had a Renesis in your car, you'd get better gas mileage than you do now. You need to look at the entire package. The RX-8 actually gets comparable gas mileage to the much lighter and less agressively geared RX-7's.
exactly!
Old 11-23-07, 09:45 AM
  #49  
Learned alot | Alot to go

iTrader: (2)
 
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maby the oil then goes to the oil cooler? all pressure is regulated pre-oil filter or post oil cooler?
Old 11-23-07, 12:23 PM
  #50  
Senior Member

 
rotormind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: N.J
Posts: 363
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by diabolical1
they're not going back to peripheral exhaust ports. side ports are the present and future. the problem is that mainstream hasn't caught up yet. porting, especially on the exhaust appears to be a bit tricky, but the bottomline is that these side port engines do their job better than the older design. i mean think about it. stockports on these engines are making what it would take streetporting or forced induction to make on the older engines - with the same fuel. i'm sure it's just a matter of time before we all have a bag of tricks for making more power.
this is the second time i heard someone say that the older 13b need to be streetported to make as much power as a renesis. thats basically saying that the the ports on a renesis is the same size as a stock n/a 13b. well if u believe this, than your wrong. the port on the renesis is about 3 times bigger than the older
13b. but guess what, the rx8 is only making a little over 180rwhp. go to the rx8 forums where they show there actuall dyno numbers and u will see that most of them with mods r only making around 180 to 190rwhp. now u also have to consider that the renesis has lighter rotors with more compression, lighter
e-shaft, better intake design, less restrictive exhaust, and all new technology around it. the rx8 barely make any gains with mods. some guy were only making like 5hp off an exhaust. so why would that side exhaust be considered any with hp? older 13b's make more power on a streetport


Quick Reply: Next Generation Renesis (Rotary Engine 16X), photos from Tokyo Auto Show



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.