Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Fuji racing irtb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #26  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by anewconvert
The best reason to use 4 TBs... You can customize the length and diameter of the primary vs secondary/6PI intake to take advantage of their inherenet differences. Long and narrow for the primaries, short and wide for the secondary/6PI

Would be even nicer to run a 2 throttle setup with the secondaries and primaries completely segregated with the runners in a boxer formation. but I digress.

BC

WOW, you just described a STOCK intake manifold from 85 till now (2006 almost 07) with the exception of 1 throttle body for the primaries instead of two.

~Mike...........
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #27  
anewconvert's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
WOW, you just described a STOCK intake manifold from 85 till now (2006 almost 07) with the exception of 1 throttle body for the primaries instead of two.

~Mike...........

Yep. Mazda engineers arent idiots. Only thing I would have changed with thier design would be ITBs closer to the ports to reduce throttled volume... Sound familiar?


BC
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.