16.24@83.58
10-24-01, 11:59 PM
#1
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16.24@83.58
my gtu ran its fastest time today
rt .516
60 2.247
330 6.727
1/8 10.391
mph 67.15
1000 13.574
1/4 16.246
mph 83.58
keep in mind this is a 89 gtu with headers, hiflow cat, intake and NONFUNCTIONAL six ports. i think i did ok
rt .516
60 2.247
330 6.727
1/8 10.391
mph 67.15
1000 13.574
1/4 16.246
mph 83.58
keep in mind this is a 89 gtu with headers, hiflow cat, intake and NONFUNCTIONAL six ports. i think i did ok
10-26-01, 08:38 PM
#6
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ThirdGenRX7
that's still 1sec+ slower than my slowest 1/4 mile ever in my integra
actually 1.4 seconds slower
that's still 1sec+ slower than my slowest 1/4 mile ever in my integra
actually 1.4 seconds slower
Trending Topics
10-27-01, 12:25 PM
#9
Full Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slap on a turbo and you'll really fly!
10-27-01, 05:22 PM
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 16.24@83.58
Originally posted by vosko
my gtu ran its fastest time today
rt .516
60 2.247
330 6.727
1/8 10.391
mph 67.15
1000 13.574
1/4 16.246
mph 83.58
keep in mind this is a 89 gtu with headers, hiflow cat, intake and NONFUNCTIONAL six ports. i think i did ok
my gtu ran its fastest time today
rt .516
60 2.247
330 6.727
1/8 10.391
mph 67.15
1000 13.574
1/4 16.246
mph 83.58
keep in mind this is a 89 gtu with headers, hiflow cat, intake and NONFUNCTIONAL six ports. i think i did ok
dont take this the wrong way, but i ran 10.2 1/8th mile at 67.
when i went to the 1/4 mile track, i ran 16.1 at 83 with a 10.39 1/8th mile.
that was in my old car, it was a 87 base model with a k & N drop-in ONLY. i think your car can run much better than 16.2.
10-27-01, 06:11 PM
#14
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Boosted & Black
i didnt notice it before but NONFUCTIONAL six ports...meaning stuck closed or wired open?
i didnt notice it before but NONFUCTIONAL six ports...meaning stuck closed or wired open?
10-28-01, 04:30 PM
#18
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by peejay
You probably will! Every N/A FC I've seen with WORKING ports was slower than that... and you had two ports tied behind your back so to speak...
You probably will! Every N/A FC I've seen with WORKING ports was slower than that... and you had two ports tied behind your back so to speak...
more videos to come of course, hopefully beating something this time
11-06-01, 12:12 PM
#20
...
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya vosko I was pretty impressed with that mustang GT run. Did the GT have any mods at all? How much did you end up losing by anyways? With good 6 ports you prolly would have ran him pretty good. With your 89 what is wrong with the 6 ports, are they just stuck from buildup and being old or what?
11-06-01, 08:11 PM
#21
Just Call Me Terminator!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Ryde _Or_Die
Ya vosko I was pretty impressed with that mustang GT run. Did the GT have any mods at all? How much did you end up losing by anyways? With good 6 ports you prolly would have ran him pretty good. With your 89 what is wrong with the 6 ports, are they just stuck from buildup and being old or what?
Ya vosko I was pretty impressed with that mustang GT run. Did the GT have any mods at all? How much did you end up losing by anyways? With good 6 ports you prolly would have ran him pretty good. With your 89 what is wrong with the 6 ports, are they just stuck from buildup and being old or what?
11-21-01, 11:08 PM
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm rebuilding an '83 12A and find myself a little dissapointed that stock 1st gens only do about 17 sec. 1/4 mi. My 4500 lb, 5.3L, 285hp, unmodded Chevy extended cab pickup is supposed to do around 16.5sec@80mph. I suspect my wife's Buick would be comparable with its 3.8L 200hp; the truck feels faster though.
I guess power to weight is everything when it comes to 1/4 mile times. If all I want it speed, I guess I'll go for the bridgeport and 650 Holley or just drop in a TII. After driving my truck around the track at Hallett one race weekend, plowing front tires squealing around the corners at 30mph, I know which would go faster there.
I wanna go faster and the Rx is an RX.
I guess power to weight is everything when it comes to 1/4 mile times. If all I want it speed, I guess I'll go for the bridgeport and 650 Holley or just drop in a TII. After driving my truck around the track at Hallett one race weekend, plowing front tires squealing around the corners at 30mph, I know which would go faster there.
I wanna go faster and the Rx is an RX.
11-22-01, 04:23 AM
#24
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good job dude....are you sure I'm knockin' on the 15 sec. door with my car the way it is? You've seen it...so please be honest, but not mean....Thanks alot....Congrats again on the time.....where did you run?