fd vs. supra tt vid...
11-20-05, 10:46 PM
#1
fd vs. supra tt vid...
took my fd out to the track , ran a 12.70 against a supra tt non-seq. full bpu, auto at 18psi. he ran a 13.4, we trapped the same speeds 110mph, check it out.
http://www.jusspress.com/day.php?use...entTime=203856
http://www.jusspress.com/day.php?use...entTime=203856
11-20-05, 11:25 PM
#2
BWAAA
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: sofla-this isnt naxxramas
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
was the supra brake boosting or something???
i see his rear wheels are moving at the tree unless he has some little midget spinning some spinners behind that block thing lol
i see his rear wheels are moving at the tree unless he has some little midget spinning some spinners behind that block thing lol
11-21-05, 11:38 AM
#6
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by smg944
when he was spinning his tires at the light, he said he was trying to get his turbos to spool good. he was runnin non-seq. twins.
how coem u dont turn up the boost?
11-21-05, 11:40 AM
#7
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by rx_playa
he tried to look cool by spinning his wheels (or it was his first time at the tree) still that supra wasn't too fast
Trending Topics
11-21-05, 01:15 PM
#9
his supra is about as fast as my fd we trapped 110mph. my intake temps were 45c, when i dynoed my car it was 22c. so hp was down a bit. i had a 2.0 60' and he had a 2.3 60'. the supra is bpu non-seq. at 18psi, he has 360+whp. btw a 116mph trap is about 340-350whp from most slips i have seen.
11-21-05, 01:45 PM
#10
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by FB II
original post says clearly they both trapped 110. i'd say bad for both... should be more like 116 or so.
why should it be 116 for both. fd needs more than 316 to trap 116mph. full bolton cars with 15psi trap 116mph.
11-21-05, 01:47 PM
#11
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by smg944
his supra is about as fast as my fd we trapped 110mph. my intake temps were 45c, when i dynoed my car it was 22c. so hp was down a bit. i had a 2.0 60' and he had a 2.3 60'. the supra is bpu non-seq. at 18psi, he has 360+whp. btw a 116mph trap is about 340-350whp from most slips i have seen.
How did u manage 22C intake temps on a dyno?
11-22-05, 08:10 AM
#17
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by smg944
outside temps were 55f , had 2 fans facing the intercooler, 2 rad fans on, and a bag of ice on the intake mani and tb. i plan on turing up the boost once i port and rebuild the motor. after that expecting 375whp at 15psi.
i made 360 rwhp @ 15psi on stock ports with a conservtive tune of 10.8.
add a port job and a tune in the 11s and you are there
11-22-05, 12:04 PM
#19
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Originally Posted by smg944
thanks, for all the replys.
matty, was that 360whp at 15psi on stock twins or single?
matty, was that 360whp at 15psi on stock twins or single?
i hear the rx-6 makes similar power at said psi level/
02-08-06, 06:05 PM
#21
the guy with the supra goes to my school and im very good friends with him.... his car is auto. and used to have a 3800 stall converter on it... he took it off b/c gas mileage was killing him and his his dd. non seq on those cars gives them a shitty launch. it should be at least a mid 12 second car either with a stall, or back to stock sequential setup. good run tho, steves fd is one of the nicest in tampa.
02-09-06, 01:20 AM
#23
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marysville, CA
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dohc-vtec_eg
nice race! 
