FD vs 636 Ninja w/bolt ons***VIDEO***
He has a 20B with a rather large turbo. Unless his car is not runing right you expect some nice numbers out of it.
Why so much hate for the guy? I'm serious what's your agenda?
I never once put down his car, but it's no treat for a swapped/built car to beat a stock Evo or Supra. I'm sure the thing puts down some decent numbers, but to make such big claims with out detail or supporting visual evidence is just asinine
Dude that's lame, and you know it. Please, do tell how so? The picture that you posted is missing key components, and obviously not running. I beg to differ, it just fired up on Monday and has all the necessary and key components to run. Cold side and cooling system are not necessary for running the vehicle Hence what would your answer be zero? The least you could had done is provide a recent picture of the engine bay to make your point. Stay tuned for more updates, and VIDEOS But I guess you were too eager to make your obscure point that you grabbed the first pic you saw.
edit-
See the issue here is that the posts were obscure to begin with... No car was specified, nor exactly what breakfast meant. He stated "all the above" when refering to what vehicles he beat. And don't be ignorant, it's blaitently obvious that when refering to "eating all of the above for breakfast" he wasn't talking about poouring himfelf a glass of OJ, buttering up some toast, fryin up a little bacon, busting out the sawzall to cut a Mark IV Supra wing into edible portions I didn't take it as rape shower you did. But whatever this conversation has run it's course.again "eating supras, evos, and 1000s" for breakfast does not imply that he put a fender on them
Why so much hate for the guy? I'm serious what's your agenda?
I never once put down his car, but it's no treat for a swapped/built car to beat a stock Evo or Supra. I'm sure the thing puts down some decent numbers, but to make such big claims with out detail or supporting visual evidence is just asinine
Dude that's lame, and you know it. Please, do tell how so? The picture that you posted is missing key components, and obviously not running. I beg to differ, it just fired up on Monday and has all the necessary and key components to run. Cold side and cooling system are not necessary for running the vehicle Hence what would your answer be zero? The least you could had done is provide a recent picture of the engine bay to make your point. Stay tuned for more updates, and VIDEOS But I guess you were too eager to make your obscure point that you grabbed the first pic you saw.
edit-
See the issue here is that the posts were obscure to begin with... No car was specified, nor exactly what breakfast meant. He stated "all the above" when refering to what vehicles he beat. And don't be ignorant, it's blaitently obvious that when refering to "eating all of the above for breakfast" he wasn't talking about poouring himfelf a glass of OJ, buttering up some toast, fryin up a little bacon, busting out the sawzall to cut a Mark IV Supra wing into edible portions I didn't take it as rape shower you did. But whatever this conversation has run it's course.again "eating supras, evos, and 1000s" for breakfast does not imply that he put a fender on them
i never said that i can beat those cars.. i said that i have raced supra, evos, and litter bikes and i have won. You have to expect that people will question such claims man. Those are the concidered to be some of the "faster" cars on the street, am I right? If you actually did, congrats, I'd love to see some future videos of your car.
twin turbo ls2? that's sweet man! but you kinda killed your self by posting a picture of your engine half way done..
This is the motor halfway done:
no worries montego, individuals like them is what makes and keeps the forums entertaining.
and just for the record you guys are right.. my car is very slow, i run high 14's and i get spanked by almost everything on the streets.
My Civic ran 13.6@127, I feel your pain
i'll mount my camera soon
twin turbo ls2? that's sweet man! but you kinda killed your self by posting a picture of your engine half way done..
This is the motor halfway done:
no worries montego, individuals like them is what makes and keeps the forums entertaining.
and just for the record you guys are right.. my car is very slow, i run high 14's and i get spanked by almost everything on the streets.
My Civic ran 13.6@127, I feel your pain
i'll mount my camera soon
The Claps
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Vivvid Studio
No there's no beef Montego.
It's just funny.
No problem.
What track do you frequent?
Just curious...
That's EXACTLY what I wanted to hear....seriously.
It's just funny.
What track do you frequent?
Just curious...
That's EXACTLY what I wanted to hear....seriously.
FC3S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: I come from a land downunder
Im just gonna say, there is plenty of 13b's running low 11's high 10's with a smaller turbo then the 1 on that 20b. I have plenty of faith that thing could run a 9.
P.S. **** evo's and supras
P.S. **** evo's and supras
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
.
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
It would make an awesome race!!
Neither would have traction, but it'd still be epic.
+2
It's pretty obvious we were all pretty bored.
No one takes anything personal, so we all have fun.
curious to see what your setup is capable of.. ive got a 20b gt42r project goal in mind..
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Who?
<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mHduiGr6oUo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&versi on=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mHduiGr6oUo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&versi on=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></embed></object>
<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mHduiGr6oUo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&versi on=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mHduiGr6oUo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&versi on=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></embed></object>
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
I can't wait to see it running correctly on the dyno and see some track numbers as actually using the numbers is the biggest factor.
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55HbD...el_video_title
This car is built for the standing mile...obviously.
I have a feeling it'll do decent.
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Deltona, FL
I always find it amusing to see videos of RX7s or any other car "beating" a sport bike. It cracks me up. Now, I'm a big rotary fan, have been all my life (my dad drove nothing but RX7s since before I was born), and I've owned 6 personally, have an 88 TII now, love that car! BUT, I also raced sportbikes for years, CCS and WERA, and there is no way in hell that any car is going to beat a properly geared sportbike with a capable rider. That is the key, proper gearing and capable riding. I always find it hilarious when fools try to street race me in their cars when I'm out cruising on my 09 zx10r. Unless your car will do 0-60 in under 3-4 seconds with a top speed of 190-200mph its not gonna cut it. Besides that, IMHO cars at speeds greater than 160mph get real squirrely, not enough down force to counteract the lift from the under body, bikes on the other hand get more stable at higher speeds, 200mph feels rock solid.
And although I don't recommend doing 160+ on the highway, there are TONS of FDs that'll do that, too
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Waiting for Indykid to catch up
I always find it amusing to see videos of RX7s or any other car "beating" a sport bike. It cracks me up. Now, I'm a big rotary fan, have been all my life (my dad drove nothing but RX7s since before I was born), and I've owned 6 personally, have an 88 TII now, love that car! BUT, I also raced sportbikes for years, CCS and WERA, and there is no way in hell that any car is going to beat a properly geared sportbike with a capable rider. That is the key, proper gearing and capable riding. I always find it hilarious when fools try to street race me in their cars when I'm out cruising on my 09 zx10r. Unless your car will do 0-60 in under 3-4 seconds with a top speed of 190-200mph its not gonna cut it. Besides that, IMHO cars at speeds greater than 160mph get real squirrely, not enough down force to counteract the lift from the under body, bikes on the other hand get more stable at higher speeds, 200mph feels rock solid.
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Deltona, FL
1993 Mazda RX-7 R1 0-60 mph 5.1 Quarter mile 13.6
1995 Mazda RX-7 R2 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.9
Whereas a bone stock Kawasaki ZX10R will do 0-60 in 2.92 seconds.
I have done upwards of 160mph in an RX7 and its squirrelly, not as much as some other cars but squirrelly none the less. Now I've been verified (by transponder) at 202mph on the east banking at Daytona on a 2005 GSXR1000 in 2006 and it was rock solid. My point is that bikes are inherently faster, its usually operator error or bad choice of sprockets that results in videos like the one above. Look at the power to weight ratio of a 700hp FD , it weighs 2888lbs stock (and is only 296hp stock). You take a 2011 ZX10R for example is 210HP stock and weighs only 436lbs full of fluids. Do the math. No competition.